Slashdot Mirror


Windows 98, Me, NT4, 2000 and XP SSL Flawed

JoeSmack writes "In amazingly unexpected news, ComputerWorld is running an article that says the SSL security hole found in Internet Explorer is not a flaw in the browser, but in the operating system itself." The article mentions that Konqueror was patched against the same bug in 90 minutes.

2 of 483 comments (clear)

  1. things i dont get by jeffy124 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    i saw the article earlier today. there are some things I just do not understand here. first some facts:
    • The bug is in the OS crypto services
    • It's NOT MS's crypto api
    • Only IE is affected.
    Time for rhetorical questions:

    Anybody else not see the lack of logic here? MS has two crypto implementations? One for the OS, one for the API? Why the redundancy? Why cant the OS use the API? Or conversely, why is the API necessary when there's the services are in the OS?

    How in the world is IE the only app affected? It seems more to logical to assume that any app using this crypto services are also vulnerable.
    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  2. Re:Slow down there. by bergeron76 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You either need to trust your vendor to provide patches, or you need to realize that in the real world, not everyone has time to make a test bed and test that every CVS patch works the way it is claimed to.

    I implicity trust Redhat, Mandrake, and all the major Linux vendors for that matter; _implicitly_. Based on nothing more than the fact that they have a proven track record of being trustworthy, and not eavesdropping/abusing/fscking the consumer. Microsoft on the other hand has a notorious reputation for abusing customers, vendors, programmers and competitors. I won't provide any references because I'm quite certain that google will provide more than I care to count. Do the homework yourself if you don't already agree.

    If for no other reason than that, I will trust Redhat to provide "vendor" patches because I have no reason not to. For the record, I'm not one of those "paranoid"/"I'll fix the code myself" people you spoke of. I'm just joe-average-sysadmin with my company's best interests in mind.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.