Slashdot Mirror


Home-Schooling and "Open Source" Materials?

Deagol asks: "After we registered our daughter for second grade yesterday at public school, I began to ponder (yet again) the question of homeschooling. There's certainly not a lack of sites out there about the topic, but I was surprised at the lack of public domain materials out there. I would think there'd more collections of public domain 'courses' since the K-12 core knowledge base is so stable and well understood. Sure, there are tons of places that will sell you kits of course materials, and quite a few home-schoolers who made their own courses (but only offer them for a fee). I assume there's more than a few homeschoolers out there on Slashdot. Are there any good sources of free home-schooling materials (including software) out there?"

33 of 115 comments (clear)

  1. If i had kids by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    If I had kids, I would probably homeschool too, at least for the earlier years. Mailny beacuse I had bad experiances at school (maily teaching methods!).

    Having thought about this for a while, and bringing up my younger brothers and sisters (i have 6 of them!) here's my thoughts.

    1: decide of a few core sobjects you belive that your child should learn and search for material on those subjects.

    2: Make sure that you pick a broad range of education, you don't have to go too deep into every topic/area. Include things like art, music, hand crafts, social sciences as well as the more academic subjects.

    3: Find something you always wanted to learn at school and learn it with your child, you should be a quicker learner and it wil be fun for both of you.(that'd be spelling and co for me!)

    4: most importantly make everything as fun as possible. Ancient history (3000 years - 300 years ago) is very easy to make into a fun subject and you don't have to worry about ofending anyone when you talk about alixander the great going on a rampage all over asia minor, or some of the stupid things they done in the crusades.

    I hope it works out well, you child will probably thank you for it in the future!

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:If i had kids by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      I'm sure you doctor would like to have better handwriting too.

      Most of my teachers couldn't spell either, and my gramdma was a teacher for 20 odd years, i wouldn't call her that bright either.

      We all no what happens when you make assumptions?

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  2. We homeschool our 5 year old.... by BFedRec · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My wife has her degree in early childhood education and is a state certified teacher, but she stays at home with my son and homeschools him. I hadn't really thought about the fact that we are really laying out a fair amount of money for the materials. The state regulations in GA as I understand it are that you don't have to use a certain accredited course.. you have do certain placement testing after every 3rd grade or so (my boy is only 5 and doing 2nd grade work right now so it hasn't come up yet)... not sure on the final diploma requirements though... I'll ask the Mrs and post again....

    1. Re:We homeschool our 5 year old.... by BFedRec · · Score: 2, Informative

      well... she says that for grade/elementary school if you joined a public or private school you'd get either placed by age or by evaluation... and after 3rd grade you have to take a state certified test every other year to determine that the student is meeting certain aptitude criteria if they are homeschooled.

      So the curriculum isn't actually doing anything but making sure that the student achieves a certain skill level set by the state education organizations (I think you can check the websites for your state government, find the education dept, and then find listings of what they state are the required things/levels that the student should know). Which would imply that you don't NEED to buy a curriculum... it is however much easier than coming up with all the work sheets, etc, that most students are going to need to ensure that they are learning the proper things...

      Most of the curriculums actually ARE open source... in that they are simply workbooks, etc, teaching the basic stuff that everybody knows (their source of information is open)... not some special formula for education. They however are not free...

      So for a DIY kind of person you could theoretically take those state requirement listings and base what you're teaching on those, rather than purchasing a curriculum. There are also local home schooling groups, which will aid you in getting started.

      I think one of the main reasons there aren't any really totally free ready-to-teach curriculums out there, is that most of the people who are home schooling have given up one income in the household, and are either teaching with other people's curriculum (or an amalgam of several company's materials) or are selling their own custom designed curriculum as a method for supplementing their family's income...

    2. Re:We homeschool our 5 year old.... by medcalf · · Score: 2
      So the curriculum isn't actually doing anything but making sure that the student achieves a certain skill level set by the state education organizations (I think you can check the websites for your state government, find the education dept, and then find listings of what they state are the required things/levels that the student should know). Which would imply that you don't NEED to buy a curriculum... it is however much easier than coming up with all the work sheets, etc, that most students are going to need to ensure that they are learning the proper things...

      It's not the students who need the worksheets to ensure they're learning the proper things. It's the teachers.

      You're right, there's no special "formula" for education. I think this is what scares many people about the idea of homeschooling. The public schools are *not* the last word on what should/should not be taught, and when and how.

      Here's the thing about state-approved curricula: okay, so some folks got together and decided they know what's best for our kids. They decided what should be learned and when. This has become some scary, sacred thing. Standards, checklists, curriculum objectives, blah blah blah. Why are those the "proper things" to learn? What if my kid learns things in a different order? At a different time? What if he learns different things? My 6 year old doesn't know his sight words, but he can tell you more about World War II than most adults know. Should I stop wasting time on all that history until he catches up to the state-mandated age-appropriate skills?

      Where *did* Jefferson put those worksheets, anyway?

      --
      -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
  3. Don't overlook Project Gutenberg! by timothy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Project Gutenberg (http://promo.net/pg/) has some of the best literature ever written, from Alice in Wonderland to Emile Zola; you can download the complete works of Mark Twain as a single zipped archive :)

    I wonder if anyone can suggest good analogs to PG for music and / or spoken-word materials, things like classic radio broadcasts, famous speeches, audio books with appropriate licenses, etc ...

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:Don't overlook Project Gutenberg! by funky+womble · · Score: 3, Informative
      Archive.org seems to be thinking along those lines - they're not hosting the things you ask for, but since they have a library of copyright-free films, and an archive of television news from Sept. 11th, it's probably something they may be thinking of.

      They are also planning an International Children's Digital Library which looks like it could be a very interesting resource.

  4. The curriculum is NOT that set... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 3, Informative

    As a former special ed teacher (in elementary, but also in high school for a while), I'd first suggest you ask yourself why you want to homeschool. I've worked with a number of homeschooled students. While I find that, in many cases, they are well educated, that does not make up for the social issues I see almost all of these students develop. Homeschooled students simply do not get the myriad of opportunities to interact with peers and authority figures that they would in school. In one school the valedictorian had been homeschooled for most of his life. When he graduated, he was not emotionally ready for college, and would not have been able to handle making all the personal decisions living away from home requires. He did not know how to interact wit hthe other students who frequently laughed at his attempts to "fit in." Now that I'm in the business world, I see he is also not someone I would want to hire. While homeschooling may have helped him academically, his social skills were so poor, I could not see him interacting well with other employees or working with a team in a beneficial way. He simply did not have the experience at interacting and working with people.

    While I have seen some homeschooled students do quite well, the majority I've seen (both in and out of special ed) are too much like the student I described above to be a coincidence. The parents are so thrilled Junior is thinking like them and acting the way he's been told to act, they don't see this. The few students that did well had EXTENSIVE social activities (I mean way more than non-homeschooled students had), such as playing on a soccer team AND acting in community plays AND ballet going on all at once -- which often would also lead to burnout.

    On the other hand, I have another point to help. Schools go through textbook adoption in cycles. For elementary, one year they're working on Language Arts, then Math, then Science, etc. See if you can work with other parents in the area that want to homeschool. As a group go to school districts in the general area and see if you can obtain used copies of books they're discarding when they adopt new books. Do this with private schools as well.

    The curriculum is not as set as the question makes it sound -- there are constant changes in elementary education (the very fact that statement was in the question leads me to ask if the person who asked the question knows enough about learning and what teachers are actually doing when they teach to be an effective teacher -- reading, for example, is not an easy subject to teach effectively). I only taught for 10 years, but the way reading and language arts was taught in that time changed enough so I would not have wanted to use textbooks available at the beginning of that time 10 years later.

    1. Re:The curriculum is NOT that set... by dbrutus · · Score: 2

      It's funny that when people actually do studies, the socialization scores of home schoolers end up right in the mainstream of the student population but their academic scores end up superior to the public school population. I guess you don't buy into those statistically valid samples and peer reviewed methodologies.

      The problem of academically gifted, socially awkward students is something that plays out every day in schools with the 'jocks' mocking the 'geeks' being a recurring theme. The question isn't whether a student is awkward, that happens in all systems. The real question is whether the incidence of awkwardness is within normal paramaters.

      As for curricula, yes, they do change. When I was in primary and secondary school we didn't have Gaia advocates and PETA shills coming in to the schools. My younger cousin did. Heather has two Mommies is also a recent elementary school innovation.

      The point is that changing curricula isn't necessarily good or bad. The idea of creating an open curricula project that can be forked if it beaches on the shoals of controversy is a very salutory idea. Math is math and when you see declining test scores over several cycles of curricula 'improvement' (see the mid 60s through mid 80s) then something is severely wrong.

      The problem is that amateurs are producing superior academic results to the professionals. Social interaction is something you can get by having a big building and funneling a lot of kids there. It takes precious little skill on the part of teachers and administrators. The academic skills are the metrics that are most influenced by teachers and in the areas where home schooling is breaking out, those teacher influenced metrics are atrocious.

    2. Re:The curriculum is NOT that set... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2

      I was a home schooler myself and I plan to home school my children as well. Every time I tell someone this, they respond with "well, what about the social skils?!" My best response is that it is important for your children to be allowed freedom to interact with others. Making friends at a local church is one way. Another (which I personally used) was to begin working at an early age.

      I was 14 when I started working at the local McDonalds. When I started, I couldn't tell a good joke worth a damn (although I think this has more to do with my personality rhan anything else). Slowly but surely I learned to interact better, tell jokes, spar with words, etc. None the less, I am a private person to this day. But is it so bad to want to enjoy some privacy? I really don't want every Tom. Dick, and Harry knowing everything about my life. I do however, tend to keep a close circle of friends. These are people I know, trust, and enjoy spending time with. Just don't expect me to go out for a beer with a bunch of guys I barely know.

    3. Re:The curriculum is NOT that set... by joshki · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Sorry -- the whole socialization issue is really just a smoke-screen that people like to throw up when they can't come up with a better reason to keep kids away from all the bad influences in public schools. I don't want my children socialized in a state-run breeding ground for liberalism, and I don't think I'm the only one. That doesn't mean that my kids (when I have them) will ever be "locked in a closet," or kept from having friends, participating in activities outside the home, etc. There are many activities availble to a parent who home schools -- in fact, most areas now have groups where people organize soccer teams, track teams, chess clubs, etc, of home schooled children.

      There may be people who isolate their children, but that's the exception, not the norm. I was home-schooled, and I learned to interact with people just fine. I started college when I was 13, and I fit in with the freshman without any problems. In fact, they would frequently come to me for help with the math and computer programming stuff that they couldn't do. They didn't have the critical thinking skills to handle complicated problems, I did. As a result, I got along with just about everyone. Had I gone to a public school, or to a high-school, I would have probably been ostracized for being a geek, but I managed to completely avoid having to deal with it by bypassing the immature high-school crowd. And if you want proof that I can "socialize" and deal with people, I've been a supervisor in the Navy for the last 5 years, and I've always received outstanding marks for leadership and teamwork -- even from some of the most difficult people I've ever had to work for.

      On the minus side, home-schooling isn't perfect. I am currently trying to get admitted to a College in the Hampton Roads area, and found out that they will not accept me. Even though I have 117 credit hours (transferable -- I've got more than that), most of it on the dean's list -- they will not accept me into their undergraduate program because I do not have a high-school diploma from a "state accredited" school. It's a slap in the face to the whole home-school movement, and an insult to me and my education, but I have no choice but to go out and take the GED so I can get my Bachelor's degree.

      --
      I do not read or respond to AC's. If you want a discussion, log in. Otherwise, don't waste your time.
    4. Re:The curriculum is NOT that set... by bluGill · · Score: 2

      There is very little difference between the Republicans and Democrats. Get out and learn what the real issues are. You will soon discover two things: There are many thousands of issues, and all have a whole range of possibale positions. If two people ever agree 100% on all the issues, then one of those two needs to be shot for not having a mind.

      Liberalism is any belief that you disagree with, that is also new (and often popular). It is an attack because many view it as a group of changes that they belive are for the worse.

    5. Re:The curriculum is NOT that set... by ProlificSage · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The curriculum is not as set as the question makes it sound -- there are constant changes in elementary education

      This is part of the problem. Too many people theorizing and not enough reliance on proven methods. Phonics is how to teach reading. Period. Whole language is a failure.

      Do you know why grammar school is called that? Because they used to teach grammar in those grades. Not just English, Greek and Latin as well. How many elementary school teachers were even required to learn a second language, let alone teach it?

      Show me an average (American) public school teacher and I'll show you someone who's got degrees in Education which emphasize methods and inclusion and other crap, not degrees in his/her subject matter. Granted, there are some people with plenty of knowledge that can't teach to save their lives (tenured college profs come to mind), but that doesn't excuse the fact that many of our teachers have much less knowledge of subject matter than the typical baccalaureate.

      I strongly suggest that any opponents of home-schooling, especially teachers, go out and get a copy of Conspiracy of Ignorance: The Failure of American Public Schools This book shows how public eduaction emphasizes individualization and "feeling good about yourself" over subject matter. Is it any wonder we're nowhere near the top 10 in math and science world-wide?

      Before I get flamed, just let me say that I had the opportunity to work in the same school system in which I grew up. I got to see how the curriculum is watered down, the special needs kids are catered to, and the gifted are generally ignored. When the gifted aren't ignored, they usually end up with more work, not more challengin, just more, because their teachers don't know what to do with them.

      I've also gone to both public and private schools and definitely got more out of the private school where the teachers' hands weren't tied by unions and administration. I've seen teachers who knew the teaching methods they were required to use were ineffective, but could do nothing about it because the current methods were "policy." Every kid is different, or so we like to tell them, so teachers ought to be able to adapt their methods to individual needs.

      Take a good look around the tech sector. There are plenty of H1B visa workers where there used to be Americans. Why? Because the education in other countries is focused on the facts, not how the kids "feel" about their performance. The American public school system hardly prepares children for the reality of corporate America, where many of them will likely end up working.

      --
      Real software engineers regret the existence of COBOL, FORTRAN and BASIC.
    6. Re:The curriculum is NOT that set... by daoine · · Score: 2
      Phonics is how to teach reading. Period. Whole language is a failure.

      I'm not quite sure what you're thinking about is 'whole language'...I think you're confusing it with 'whole word'. 'Whole word' is a style of teaching reading that teaches kids to read words by recognition -- it bumps up directly against phonics. 'Whole language' is a way of thinking about how to merge reading, spelling, and writing such that the learning has meaning to the kids, rather than making it rote. It also addresses the way kids learn...you don't correct a baby that's learning to speak...you wait until it can use the correction. In the same way, you don't nitpick over a child's spelling errors when they're writing their first essay -- you introduce spelling gradually so you achieve the spelling goal without undue criticism.

      I agree that whole word is a pretty poor way to learn to read...you can't introduce new words without being in the proper setting. Whole language has gotten a bad repuation because it has been associated and confused with whole word, when in fact - the two are quite distinct and shouldn't be lumped together.

    7. Re:The curriculum is NOT that set... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Based on my experiences with home schooling, the home schooled students are for batter adjusted for society, then public schools.

      Sure, you lock your kid in a closet, and teach him by sliding material under the door, they will have problems. Every home schooling parent I know gets together with other home schooled kids regularly. The get about 50-100 kids and go to museums on days the public schools do NOT. they get to be there longer, and get to kow each other in an atmosphere of learning and creative discussion that you will never find in a public shool group attending the museaum.

      In CA, and possible other states, home schooled kids are allow to participate in school activities, sports, clubs, music, etc... because there parents raxes go to the schools. so they get to learn social skills that way as well.

      the reading curriculmn changes because it is being geared to the lowest denomenator, and who ever gets budget control gets to do thing there little pet ways.

      The only social skills public education teaches is Bullies get there way, sports are more important the science and arts, and teacher don't give a damn and the only way to solve your problems are through violense. Yes shootings are rare, but I refer to the more general violense that goes on every day that the teacher and staff turn a blind eye to.

      as a matter of fact, your post is so oposite then my real life experience I almost modded you as flamebait.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:The curriculum is NOT that set... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      is that a private school? I had thought that all non private schools had to accept home schooled students. Obviously with the same criteria as public school taught(SAT, etc...)

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:The curriculum is NOT that set... by joshki · · Score: 2

      evidently it's not a law... I'm sure I could probably sue them, but it's just not worth the effort. If I can't pass the GED, I'd be pretty shocked -- I've been doing college work since I was 13. The only thing that's kept me from getting my degree is money (and now this college's admissions dept).

      --
      I do not read or respond to AC's. If you want a discussion, log in. Otherwise, don't waste your time.
    10. Re:The curriculum is NOT that set... by dbrutus · · Score: 2

      I'm not going to prove the world is round. There are plenty of objective studies out there that are *not* done by parties with an axe to grind. If you are genuinely curious and are not coming out with an agenda, you'll spend a few minutes on google and come across them.

      If you taught statistics, you should certainly know the fallacy of anecdotal evidence. The fact is that there is widespread dissatisfaction with the public school system and objectively that school system has soaked up a lot of resources. Private schools often do more with less resources (especially the religious ones). Home school children are showing up as winners in national academic contests far out of proportion to their presence in the relevant population (home schooling is still under 1% nationally).

      The NEA and AFT have been putting out FUD for years regarding home schooling after their previous campaigns of legal intimidation and storm trooper tactics didn't pan out. One by one their excuses for poor performance in the public schools have been shot down. The socialization of home school children is pretty much the last one. Don't buy into it.

  5. Two great resources by neocon · · Score: 3, Informative
    One word of advice: definitely check out the Home School Legal Defense Association.

    In addition to helping with the various legal hurdles some states impose on home-schoolers, the HSLDA also provides a clearing house for home-schooling information.

    Another group you may find interesting is k12.com, which is an internet-based classroom for homeschoolers, founded by former US Secretary of Education Bill Bennett.

  6. Free Homeschooling Materials by medcalf · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is true that you won't find a great deal of actual courses freely available. The information being taught in any course/curriculum is public domain; you're paying for the time and effort it took for someone to arrange that information for you.

    However, do you need actual courses? The information you're seeking *is* out there for free. It is possible to pull together a fantastic curriculum with little effort.

    One book you should immediately look at is "Homeschooling Your Child for Free." I forget the author, but you can find it on the shelf at any Barnes and Noble, Borders, etc. I found a copy at my local library. It is filled with free educational resources on every subject. If there are free courses available, this book will list them.

    Another useful book is "Home Education Year by Year" by Rebecca Rupp. This book will walk you through pulling your own curriculum together.

    There are literally thousands of free lesson plans for teachers on the web.

    All of the phonics and reading materials I use to teach our kids can be found at the library. So far all of my science material has come from the web or libraries. My kids learn handwriting from worksheets I print off the web. Most of our citizenship and art projects come off the web too.

    I did purchase math and history programs, but I could easily teach those subjects using free resources as well.

    Finally, go grab any books you can find by John Taylor Gatto and John Holt. Anyone who is considering homeschooling should read what they have to say about education.

    ~medcalf's wife

    --
    -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
  7. A meta-question. by orthogonal · · Score: 2

    I was surprised at the lack of public domain materials out there

    I'm honestly not trying to troll here. But we must remember that most "stuff" makes it into the public domain because the copyright on it has lapsed. There is some good stuff out there at the college level, more or less, most of which my (cursory) examination reveals to be university or more rarely governmentally sponsered.

    But my point is that I, like you, am surprised at the paucity of material. (An unrelated example: try finding simple instructions for constructing a model geodesic dome. It's out there, but not to the extent I'd expected. The best beginner-level instructions are scanned from a book that went out of print in the 1970s.)

    Why is this? I think it may be that our expectations are wrong. I expect free, accurate, and complete information to easily found and painlessly obtained on the 'net.

    Why do I expect this? Because I can freely, easily and painlessly download just about any sort of software I care to name, for nearly any OS I prefer to run. In the last few years, I've even come to expect a choice of a binary compiled for my system or source code that I can freely modify.

    But other than software authors, who else makes their work-product available for free?

    Doctors? Generally not. Lawyers? Not too often. Civil engineers? Not that I'm aware of. Authors of (non-software related) reference works? To some small extent. Authors of (saleable) fiction or music? A few.

    But I can get nearly any software I care to name easily and at no or nominal cost (and hopefully someone will correct me by noting what categories of software can't be found freely -- GUI-based spellcheckers come to mind).

    So who's missing the boat? Free software authors, or everyone else?

  8. Re:Home Schooling will warp your child. Don't do i by Linux_ho · · Score: 2

    Hehee, I hadn't heard that one before. +1 Funny

    --
    include $sig;
    1;
  9. Education Libre by dheltzel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most Home Schoolers are not really tech savvy, but a few of us are (the demographics of home schoolers track pretty closely to the general population). The thing to remember is that homeschooling offers a great deal of freedom for parents to customize their child's education. There is not even a dominant vendor of materials, mostly because the parents really value their freedom to choose. We have never used an entire curriculum from a single vendor, we might get math from one place and English from another and decide to "roll our own" on sign language. The real point is that the curriculum is "free as in speech, not free as in beer".

    Homeschooling should not be considered a low-cost education (that would be public school), but rather a high-quality education. We would certainly be a lot of $$ ahead if my wife worked full time and we sent our kids to a private school. We make the choice to home school because we feel it is best for our kids. I don't believe it is the best choice universally, but it clearly is the best for some, it's largely a personality and value issue. I can tell you that when done well, the kids really shine. I am always amazed by the people who say there is no way the kids can be socialized properly. The people making those claims most vociferously are generally trying to assuage their own guilt for not home schooling (or even better to justify their membership in the NEA, a labor union, not a child advocacy group!). These people would not want to meet my kids, they are data points they'd rather ignore (pardon the obvious parental pride and chest beating - homeschool dad's are prone to that).

    So, in conclusion, OSS fits perfectly with home schooling. They are, at a philosophical level, cut from the same mold. I'm proud to be a staunch advocate of both!

  10. Re:Think hard about it... by flockofseagulls · · Score: 2, Informative

    Many parents homeschool for regligious reasons, but no state requires homeschoolers to join a church or profess the Christian faith. (And you don't pass or fail the SAT, either.) Secular homeschoolers will easily find plenty of other people who aren't just putting their kids through religious indoctrination. For the last ten years the most growth among homeschoolers has been non-religious families.

    The best reason to homeschool your kids: to be closer as a family. Too many parents don't know their kids, don't know what their kids are doing, and leave almost every aspect of their child's education and growth to total strangers. Nothing can replace spending time with your kids every day. Numerous studies, not to mention common sense, show that kids who spend time with their parents and are part of a family do better in life.

    The socialization issue is really a non-issue; people with don't like homeschooling for one reason or another always trot that out. Spend some time in a public school and say with a straight face that most of those kids show healthy socialization. Do you really want your kids to spend 12 years in an artificial, opressive, regimented, and cruel environment that--at best--prepares them to do what they are told, to blindly accept arbitrary authority, and to jump whenever a bell rings?

    Some homeschooled kids are spelling bee geeks. Some are jocks. Some are social butterflies. To me they mostly seem like well-adjusted versions of schooled kids, minus the toxic amounts of peer pressure and grade anxiety the schooled kids carry around. And I don't have to wait for the 10th grade skills test to find out what my kids know or don't know.

    The "professional teacher" argument is another red herring favored by teachers and "education professionals." Kids know how to learn on their own. Almost everyone learns the single hardest skill they will ever learn--speaking their own language--with no professional help at all. Believe in your child, and yourself. If you don't know how to teach your child something you can easily find someone who can. Many homeschooled kids we know attend some classes at private schools or community college, to learn things like languages or music that are best taught by an expert.

    I have three homeschooled kids and my wife and I are involved in various city and state groups of homeschoolers. Social activities dominate the calendar: skating, teen dances and activities, camping, museum trips, 4-H, soccer and other sports, various clubs and study groups, etc. etc. Lots of kids have part-time jobs. Most will go to college: homeschooling conventions and curriculum fairs attract recruiters from Ivy-league schools now, and homeschoolers have higher college admission rates than public school kids.

    Don't accept random opinions from slashdotters to decide something so important. Find a local group of like-minded (secular or religious) homeschoolers and attend some activities. Read about it: John Holt's two excellent books How Children Fail and How Children Learn will open your eyes.

    If you still think public school has something magical to offer, or that the folks who run the school and choose the curriculum know more than you do, read John Taylor Gatto's excellent essay The Six-Lesson Schoolteacher at:

    www.cantrip.org/gatto.html
  11. seul.org/edu simple end user linux / education by BroadbandBradley · · Score: 2

    http://seul.org/edu

    this org has a list of learning software that works with Linux.

    you might also try:
    http://schoolforge.net/

  12. Lots of sources by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, Cliff,

    There's plenty of good stuff out there, but you'll have to do some editing. As somebody who grew up around teachers and has worked in textbook publishing I can assure you that teachers all have to do it too. Their stuff sucks far worse than anything referenced here.

    While Project Gutenberg is great, you should also check out on-line encyclopedias like NuPedia, and Everything2 which are all open source, as is The Open Directory Project . A great source of fiction, which can be a wonderful learning tool, is Baen Books who have put hundreds of book online and are eager to have them downloaded and spread around.

    For science materials, there are lots of great sites for kids done by educators pursuing whever they're into. All of which you'll want to use to spice up access to sites like Science Daily that are handy but a bit too serious some days for young minds.

    Which brings me to Make Stuff which should fill in quite nicely for the "arts and crafts" part of most school curricula.

    For biography I'ld check out American National Biography and for history a good start can be made with pages like Anyday which can be amazing or useless, all based on where *you* go from the starting point that they provide. Places like Colonial America are designed just for this but again, check out more than one.

    For reference material you should check out Theodora which, while not meant to be open source, is very handy, Geographic.Org, which is open source and student-oriented, should do the rest. I've found that the CIA sourcebook is terrible, as folk should have long since figured out. Biased, misinformed, and sometimes just wierd; leave it behind. However if you hunt you'll find that within various.gov sites there's tons of great stuff, from manuals on camping to stuff on solar panels.

    The space science community is very kid friendly, from NASA down to the local Mars Society chapter, having plenty of materials on quite a range of topics that you're free to reproduce and spread around. If you can handle it, the neopagan community is reliably eager to provide information and links on ancient indo-european history, from the government of Sumeria, to Celtic ironwork. (You might be surprised at how many neopagans have advanced degrees in history and/or literature.)

    Speaking of limits, you'll always have to be careful that your kids aren't ending up places they shouldn't be but again, every teacher and librarian faces that one.

    Lastly, the reason that I've got all this ready to hand is that I took it from my source database, more of which can be found on my web site, which is primarily oriented towards adults and older kids but does have plenty of other links like the ones here.

    Best of luck to you and be sure to post back to slashdot in a few years about how it's going.

    Rustin H. Wright - Information Geek
    "It's all about the information, Marty. Little ones and zeros!"

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  13. ...and... by funky+womble · · Score: 2
    ...all this is possible thanks to the unique way the BBC is funded...
    BBC Learning from people who heard about the internet (:

    the Earth Edition of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy makes a nice reference and project site, and a very fitting memorial.

    Of course, this article shows that certain members of the educational IT establishment aren't too keen on the idea of providing quality learning materials free of charge.

    Good to know that some people with access to resources realise the need to supplement what's available in schools and don't have shareholders and profits to worry about.

  14. Homeschooling (with a QX3+ USB microscope) by kenneth_j_gartner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Homeschooling has lots of advantages, especially
    if the children can be networked with others
    who are pursuing the same path. Take, with a
    grain of salt, the comments which lump all
    homeschoolers together. As mentioned elsewhere,
    there are many reasons to homeschool, but expect
    to pay much more than you would for a "public"
    education ... this is an investment in the
    children. I have three children who have never
    attended "real" school (eldest is 14).

    One of the neat things about homeschooling, if
    you have a technical bent, is that you can
    really work together *with* your child to solve
    a tricky problem. You are much more engaged in
    the whole process. And they get to share a
    dynamic and passionate side of your personality.
    There are plenty of engineering, space, biology,
    programming, and math puzzles/contest/investigations available
    for free.

    My only meaningful contribution to this thread
    is the following: the "good stuff" is more
    plentiful as your children become more advanced.

    o Online biology text book. Neat. http://www.emc.maricopa.edu/faculty/farabee/BIOBK/ BioBookTOC.html

    o Look at the recently discontinued QX3+ USB
    microscope on EBay. This is billed as a toy,
    but actually is a really sophisticated
    microscope camera that directly attaches
    to your computer. Lots of neat material
    about it are to be found at http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/optics/intelplay/livev iew/index.html

    Good luck with things.

    Ken

  15. Work with the public school by bluGill · · Score: 2

    Not all public schools will work with you, but many will. Find out, and take advantage of whatever they will do.

    Try to get your kids in for music or Gym class, or perhaps you did poorly in math, so you should bring your kids in for math. I would be well advised to bring my kids (if I had them) in for english class. Most teachers have a set schedual, so you can your kid in at the same time every day for one class, and you get both socalization and instruction benifits.

    The biggest advantage of public education is the varity of people and teaching styles the kid is exposed to. Your kids need to learn to work with people, including people they don't like. They also need to learn how to deal with the "bad" kids, that is to say no when a chance to do something wrong is offered.

    Finially, don't be afraid to admit you are wrong, and give up on the whole idea. You might turn out to be a bad teacher, or you may have one kid who doesn't do well home schooled. All kids are different you might have one who shines and one who fails in home schooling. Most likely you will need to change things a little bit for each kid.

    Last, beware of people like me who give advice about how to raise your kids, but don't have kids themselves. We mean well, but we don't know your kids.

    1. Re:Work with the public school by geekoid · · Score: 2

      actuall, I find that in the home school community there are many different people with different back grounds. sometime you can swap subjects. I am good at computers and, so I may volenteer to have some kids over and teach a computer class in exchange for someone with a stronger english background to teach my kids english.

      If you have read any of my posts, that last part id pretty self-evident.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. Watch out by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    Make sure what you are doing is legal. In some places, homeschooling more than a certain number of kids together is illegal. Apparently the state wants to prohibit parents working together to educate their kids collectively. Total fascist bullshit.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  17. Free Curriculum Project by pete-classic · · Score: 2

    I asked myself the same question. I couldn't find any such thing, so I whipped up a little website and started working on the first book. I have some basic ideas for a full-blown curriculum that I intend to clean up and use to seed a wiki.

    The main thing that I hope to do is comb public domain works to create a complete set of copyleft (FDL) course materials that support a full (written) k-12 curriculum.

    I haven't really built enough of a . . . kernel to make very good use of outside help, but if someone wants to talk more email me at the address on the site (not the /. address above).

    -Peter