The Need for Open Hardware

bwt asks: "With all the talk of DRM lately, it occurs to me that the entire concept depends on limiting the choice for computer hardware. OK, so the proper reaction to the copyright industry's attempts at PC market control is to be able to build a PC that they can't control. I know there have been some discussions on open hardware, but most if it was prior to the emergence of DRM as a real threat. In fact, Richard Stallman wrote an editorial in 1999 and said 'Because copying hardware is so hard, the question of whether we're allowed to do it is not vitally important.' DRM has perhaps changed that. Isn't the need for open hardware becoming critical? What is the status of the open hardware efforts?"

Comments

so far

[Jonny Ringo]

What is the status of the open hardware efforts?
So far its closed, I'll let you know when I decide to void the warranty.

open hardware...

[tps12]

Does running my Athlon box with the cover off to keep it from bursting into flames count as "open hardware?"

PICs

[t_allardyce]

Somehow i don't think they'll fit DRM systems and onboard encryption and signing into PIC microprocessors - the poster-child of mod-chips. Anyone want to try and build an entire PC-Compatible out of these? :)

Too hard core for me

[Junior J. Junior III]

I'm not even to the point yet where I can compile my own kernel, and now you want me to build a clean room so I can build my own hardware?

It'd be nice if I could do this, but what's the point in OSH if you can't build your own?

Re:I've about had it

[foobar104]

Fweet! Illegal use of Godwin's Law. Twenty-five yard foul, Vikings have the ball.