Slashdot Mirror


FLOSS Developer Survey Results Published

grex writes "The FLOSS (Free/Libre/Open Source Software) study from the University of Maastricht has published its final report. One of its five parts is the developer survey based basically on developers from the European Union. Results show that Debian is the preferred distribution, GNOME the desktop the majority choose and vi more popular than Emacs. But this survey also handles economic, law-related and motivation aspects among developers that make it very interesting to read."

158 comments

  1. Vi more popular than Emacs ? by Salsaman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Heathens !

    1. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by phavens · · Score: 0, Troll


      Most respectable programmers I know would rather use emacs because of power and ease of use...
      Oh cie la vie...

      --
      Patrick Havens (Mr. 573333 to you.) Graphic Artist / Coder / Father / Journeler
    2. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Most respectable programmers I know would rather use Vi because of power and ease of use...

    3. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by redfenix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One might note that vi only won out by a mere 2.6% vote (38.8% vs. 36.2%). So, this could be just a mere margin of error, all in all a very close race.

      Of course, being a vi user myself should show that I have no personal reasons to point this out.

      --
      "It's a very tangled subsystem." --Windows kernel guru
    4. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by phavens · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Most repsectable programmers I know would rather use $PROGRAM_NAME because of power and ease of use...

      --
      Patrick Havens (Mr. 573333 to you.) Graphic Artist / Coder / Father / Journeler
    5. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      interesting facts:

      O'Rielly's vi books sell more than Emacs, approximate 2:1 ratio. Several years ago there was a vi vs. Emacs laser tag or something at an open-source conference - Team vi had a near 2:1 size advantage over Team Emacs, size meaning number of people, not physical measurements. Oh, and Tim O'Rielly is an Emacs defector, now uses vi.

      see also: http://www.oreilly.com/ask_tim/unix_editor.html

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    6. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by Loligo · · Score: 2, Funny

      >Most respectable programmers I know would rather
      >use emacs because of power and ease of use...

      Most reprehinsible programmers I know would rather use Visual Studio because of power and ease of use...

    7. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by STREMF · · Score: 2, Funny

      Most respectable programmers I know would rather redirect stdin to a file with cat because of power and ease of use...

    8. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score 4 Funny

      You mods crack me up.

      This post is more like Score 19 OffDaHook!

    9. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by dattaway · · Score: 2

      Google never lies:

      vi: 25,400,000. Search took 0.11 seconds.
      emacs: 2,900,000. Search took 0.08 seconds.

      Looks like a factor of 10 to me.

    10. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About 30% of the people say they are doing open source to help their chances of getting a job!

      From my experience most software companies don't hire people with a open source background since it's high risk. The risk ofcause is that people will run off with the code, cloning the project just for the purpose of driving the company out of business.

      That risk is obviously very real since over 30% of the people who has answered says proprietary software shouldn't exist.
      .

    11. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by athakur999 · · Score: 2

      Well that's hardly fair. Once you get past the first few pages, most of the results have nothing to do with VI the editor, rather they're VI the Roman numeral, Vi the person, etc.

      EMACS isn't a Roman numeral nor is it anyone's name (hopefully).

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    12. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that four out of five Europeans will surrender when faced with a simple decision. But I'm an obnoxious American, and all my people have done is save Europe from itself once or twice, so what the hell do I know?

    13. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by n0rm · · Score: 0

      It's just not right to question google.

    14. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Piss off.

      THere were a hell of a lot of other countries involved too.

      Don't disregard them just because Americans entered the war LATE.

      Bastards.

    15. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by brondsem · · Score: 1
      O'Rielly's vi books sell more than Emacs, approximate 2:1 ratio
      Maybe that just vi is really hard to learn or vi fans are kinda slow.

      Personally, I'm a SciTE fan.
      --
      "a quote" -me
    16. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      you english are funny. and by funny, i mean helpless. and in-bred. and have you ever heard of dentists?

    17. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need a emacs book since the doc is included in the editor. C-h is all you need.

    18. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but unless you have help from an actual person, you dont know what C-h stands for.

    19. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by khuber · · Score: 1
      +emacs +editor 321,000

      +vi +editor 972,000

      So, approximately 3:1 in favor of vi.

      FWIW, I use XEmacs.

      -Kevin

    20. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      two questions:

      (1) more popular for what use? For example, vi is very popular for making jokes. (Which is handled well by the emacs joke-mode command, btw.)

      (2) did they take into account the fact that being popular for an emacs user is worth 1.258 popularity points and being popular to a vi user is worth a mere .785 popularity points? They probably forgot this rule of thumb.

      Sorry, got to run, I have a turkey in the emacs that's about done. I can't wash the dishes till I get it out.

      --

      -pyrrho

    21. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by calgodot · · Score: 1

      What the hell do you do now? Wait for Europe to bail obnoxious America out this time, I guess.

      --
      --- yr pal cal "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
    22. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by ksheff · · Score: 1

      No you don't. It's on the start up screen along with the key sequence to start the tutorial.

      Get help C-h (Hold down CTRL and press h)
      Undo changes C-x u Exit Emacs C-x C-c
      Get a tutorial C-h t Use Info to read docs C-h i
      Activate menubar F10 or ESC ` or M-`
      (`C-' means use the CTRL key. `M-' means use the Meta (or Alt) key.
      If you have no Meta key, you may instead type ESC followed by the character.)
      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    23. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

      Yes, all those developments never wrote anything bigger than 'Hello world!'.

      That explains why they love Vi.

    24. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unix philosophy - several tools for different tasks that work well together rather than big, integrated packages that (try to) do everything.

      Popular swiss-army chainsaws that violate this principle - emacs (which did not originate on Unix), perl (and loads of other languages).

      I'm a former emacs user.

    25. Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      We'll give you a call if we need anyone to waive a white flag for us...hmm, maybe we can use you guys as bait. Of course, that would assume that you had any strategic value whatsoever. But everyone that matters knows that Europe has marginal value at best. Cheerfully yours, Someone in a much better country

  2. Gnome over KDE? by zmalone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The difference between the two is only ~2%, in Gnomes favor. This out of of a group of a little over 2200, I don't know if I would consider that a large enough percentage to consider it to be anything other then a margin of error.

    1. Re:Gnome over KDE? by BitterOak · · Score: 2
      The difference between the two is only ~2%, in Gnomes favor. This out of of a group of a little over 2200, I don't know if I would consider that a large enough percentage to consider it to be anything other then a margin of error.

      Well, the statistical uncertainty on a sample of 2200 is sqrt(2200) which is approximately 47, and 2% of 2200 is 44, so we are talking about slightly less than a 1 sigma effect. So you're right, it's not statistically significant.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    2. Re:Gnome over KDE? by Arandir · · Score: 2

      What is the statistical uncertainty on a self-selected sample of 2200? My guess is in the neighborhood of 2150...

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    3. Re:Gnome over KDE? by prockcore · · Score: 2

      Yes, but how many of those KDE users use Gnome/Gtk apps every day, versus Gnome users who use KDE/qt apps every day?

      I think it's safe to say that Gnome/Gtk is more widely used when you take the apps into account.

    4. Re:Gnome over KDE? by enjo13 · · Score: 1

      How can you make that assumption? I know several Gnome users who make use of Konqueror as a web browser, in just one instance. The fact is, both desktops are inherently caught up in app sharing.. which is unfortunate because it does not make for the most coherent of user experiences.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
  3. No wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Results show that Debian is the preferred distribution, GNOME the desktop the majority choose and vi more popular than Emacs

    Jeez, no wonder open sores development is so lacking. They are batting 0 for 3.

  4. Perhaps some can explain to me... by NOT-2-QUICK · · Score: 3, Funny

    What exactly does Levi Spear Parmly (1790-1859) - the inventor/developer of dental floss - have to do with open source software!

    Or then again, maybe I am just missing something... :-)

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. -- Benjamin Franklin
  5. Oh god! by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh GOD!

    I'm AVERAGE !

    noooooo!

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  6. Is this some kind of a joke?!?!? by FortKnox · · Score: 4, Funny

    In one day, we read:
    A review of Vim to get people primed for an editor war.
    Next, we read about Which is the better browser, to get that war going.
    Now, we just put all our eggs in one basket for an all out flamewar that includes distros, editors, Window Managers, and even will bring up the euro vs. american flamewars.

    Sweet lord, people! Wonder why Linux is still having trouble competing with MS? Could it possibly be internal conflicts?

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Is this some kind of a joke?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forget FreeBSD vs OpenBSD vs NetBSD vs linux vs AIX vs Solaris vs hpux vs xenix vs ultrix vs minix vs DOS vs NT vs OS X!

    2. Re:Is this some kind of a joke?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      America is better than Europe by far, by the way.

    3. Re:Is this some kind of a joke?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, I kinda like it here in Finland.

    4. Re:Is this some kind of a joke?!?!? by red_dragon · · Score: 2
      Wonder why Linux is still having trouble competing with MS? Could it possibly be internal conflicts?

      But our standards are good! We have so many to choose from!

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    5. Re:Is this some kind of a joke?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to say, this survey confims my (admittidly unscientific) testing. GNOME is a desktop well liked by hackers - hence the much higher quality of the Free software applications available for it. KDE, on the other hand, has a surplus of zealots. Very loud, crude and rather stupid - hence the huge amount of noise about it on Slashdot.

    6. Re:Is this some kind of a joke?!?!? by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      But our standards are good! We have so many to choose from!
      Wisecrack, but a lot of truth in there.
      Many standards. Better odds of being able to find a good fit.
      The real payout comes from such as using KDE apps on a GNOME desktop and using GNOME apps on a KDE desktop. The BSDs running native LINUX binaries, sometimes better than under LINUX it seems some claim.
      Anybody particularly concerned by internal confilicts will be buying support from such as Red Hat, IBM or Sun.

  7. Executive summary by tmark · · Score: 5, Funny

    Results show that Debian is the preferred distribution, GNOME the desktop the majority choose and vi more popular than Emacs.

    So what you're saying is, these guys spent a ton of money to produce a giant troll ? Did they happen to say to whether Britney Spears is hotter than Shakira, or which Star Trek TV series was best ?

    1. Re:Executive summary by tandr · · Score: 1

      Looks more like "giant flamebait" to me...

    2. Re:Executive summary by Loligo · · Score: 1


      >Don't forget the venerable Death Star vs
      >Enterprise debate

      "Yes, Jackie, you're right. The Fonz could beat up Bruce Lee."
      --Michael Kelso

  8. A Dangerous Report... by deathinc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Patient: Doctor... I seem to have a problem with my teeth.
    Doctor: Yes, what is it?
    Patient: I have his nagging pain here, is there anything you can do?
    Doctor: Let me see... HOLY CRAP! (cough) Well uh... let me put it to you straight. You seem to have a Gnome stuck inbetween your teeth. I'd get the FLOSS out, but I don't think it'd help your problem. Perhaps we should knock your teeth out and replace them all with KDE bridges.

    1. Re:A Dangerous Report... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't get it

    2. Re:A Dangerous Report... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me neither. Mods must be hitting the crack pipe again.

  9. Who cares about vi versus emacs? by Pumpernickel · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Who cares about vi versus emacs anyway? They're both old-fashioned and not useful. No one uses fixed-line editing anymore. If you want a real text program, look at MS Word, and for all you linux junkies, look at xtext.

    1. Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS word
      "real text" program = bloated proprietary format creation tool

    2. Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? by Ig0r · · Score: 3, Funny

      I agree.
      Who *doesn't* use Word to code and edit configuration files?

      --
      Soma: because a gramme is better than a damn.
    3. Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of us have use vi and emacs, and have
      never used MS Word. So we are wondering:
      what on earth are you talking about?

    5. Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2

      MS Word is not a text editor, friend.

      I don't know anybody that uses Vi or Emacs... both are nasty and inhospitable. Personally, I prefer Midnight Commander for all my programming.

      --
      Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    6. Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? by mypalmike · · Score: 1

      Amen. After finding that ActiveX control (written in VB of course) which does syntax highlighting in Word, I never code in anything else. My productivity has never been higher, with the smart, though seemingly random, indentation rules Word applies. Of course, my compiler's not too sure what to do with .doc files, but my code prints quite nicely.

      --
      There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
    7. Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, and where, please, is the compiler that accepts MS word documents?

      Does that compiler then also interpret the formatting? Such as

      Italics = "odd code, don't mess with it too much while optimizing, as it might break"
      Bold = "yes, I know what I mean, so please shut up and compile this"
      Underlined = "I'm not quite sure if this is right - please compile this in pedantic mode."

      BTW, why is the <u> tag not allowed in slashdot comments?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    8. Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ULTRAEDIT is the best code/text editor.

      Of course like most good programs its only for windows.

    9. Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are emacs a new product of Apple? Really I don't know. I looked at Aplle.com and do not see anything that says emac. I need to make an account now. I saw this place listed on http://www.geocities.com/~newlinuxrulezsite and like to play coin-op video games like Defender and Qbert. There ws an arcade on the corner by the Sizzler but the stoners came in and now it is full of cigarette smoke. They has a pool table tool. I like to play pool. And foozeball, I rule at foozeball. My Aunt Sally said that if I keep practicing I could enter a foozeball tournament, but only if I can convince the state to give me my checks again. I was in some trouble and the state took my checks away while I was in jail. Aunt Sally says that my checks are for my parents dying in that accident on the 35 with the the drunk guy driving the cement mixer. I like egeption stuff, and I want to go to college and study egeption thingd like RAS active life and how he has a good king. I have to go now. Eric Sommerfiled

    10. Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? by Papineau · · Score: 2

      I second this. The default syntax highlighting modes include C, C++, bash, java, html, Makefile, perl, latex, and that's just what I use on a regular basis. The only thing I'd like to have is some kind of auto-complete, and that's because I'm starting in Java so I'm not totally sure of some method names in the API.

      And for the file manager... I've been a Norton Commander (and clones) convert since my dad introduced me to it, circa 1988.

      Back on subject... You _can_ save a your work from Word as a textfile, but nobody I know does this, because it's not the right tool for the job. Notepad (when you've got nothing else as a real text editor) is better in this respect (if only it could be made to understand Unix EOL...).

    11. Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I'm a serious programmer for a fortune500 company, I don't use any of those crap toy hacker OS's like linux.

    12. Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? by pmz · · Score: 0

      Who *doesn't* use Word to code and edit configuration files?

      I read this and spontaneously vomited all over my keyboard and desk. Thanks a lot!

    13. Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? by Loligo · · Score: 2

      >Ah yes, and where, please, is the compiler that
      >accepts MS word documents?

      Every version of MS WOrd I've ever used has a "save as text" option.

      Your compilers DO take text, right?

      -l

    14. Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? by teetam · · Score: 2
      This is the stupidest comment I have heard in a long time. Emacs not a fixed line editor - it is anything you want it to be.

      I use emacs for Java development. I also build and run and debug the java application using emacs. My co-worker also used emacs for browsing the web and email! MS Word is a word processor and ONLY a word processor. Don't even compare the two.

      If you don't know much about emacs, there is an option for you - don't say anything about it!

      --
      All your favorite sites in one place!
    15. Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? by damiam · · Score: 1
      BTW, why is the tag not allowed in slashdot comments?

      Because it's ugly, and the same purpose can be served by italics or bold.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    16. Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? by damiam · · Score: 1

      Oh, and it can be confused with links.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    17. Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      Who *doesn't* use Word to code and edit configuration files?
      So that's what screws up the Registry.

  10. This is shit by AdamInParadise · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This study is shit. It was based on voluntary user input and it was heavily advertized on some hardcore Linux websites, so it isn't reprensentative at all. This explains vi vs. emacs, Gnome vs. KDE, Debian vs. the world...

    The industry produces seriously flawed studies. This goes to prove that the open-source world can too !

    --
    Nobox: Only simple products.
    1. Re:This is shit by deathinc · · Score: 1

      I have been using a slightly modified slogan alot recently. Usually in refrence to medical studies but it may be very applicable here...

      Lies, Damn Lies, Statistics, and Studies

    2. Re:This is shit by FreeLinux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a report discussing the pros and cons as well as the adaptation of OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE, where else would they get their data? You think that they should have gotten their report from Bill Gates?

      As for the input being from voluntary users; you think they should have rounded up a few thousand people off the street, at gun point, and asked their opinioin? You're not making sense.

      It is an excellent report, regardless of your stand on open source. It would have been better if they could have had a larger sampling but, this is not always possible due to time or budgetary constraints.

    3. Re:This is shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you expect to get statistically valid data from a study where the sample is self selected, then you're deluded. That they don't have any better way of selecting the sample doesn't make the results any more valid.

    4. Re:This is shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm not surprised. I have had the dubitable pleasure of being at a conference where one of the "researchers" of this institute was also giving an invited talk. Not only did he annoy almost all people present with his "I'm researching computer graphics from a historian's point of view" - stance (no, not kidding), his talk was filled with well, nothing. The only thing he did was dropping names "Oh, my friend X from Y does research into Z.", and then show a pretty but meaningless picture.

      Anyway, the fun part: I told my brother (physics Phd) about this wacko, and we were bien etonne de se trouver ensemble: the same guy gave an incomprehensible talk at his physics institute, and projected the same . If a room full of physics PhDs don't understand what this guy is saying he really is full of shit. ( His homepage is kind of fun -- after a laundry list of publications and presentations, his only real work turns out to be on the art of Leonardo DaVinci)

      Well, enough drivel. What scares me is that some of these windbags manage to fake people into believing that they have something interesting to tell. And that the EU is giving out money for this type of bullshit research.

    5. Re:This is shit by bmwm3nut · · Score: 1

      Lies, Damn Lies, Statistics, Studies, and Benchmarks

    6. Re:This is shit by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Every sampling method is skewed, even door-to-door canvassing. But Geez Louise! Trying to draw meaningful conclusions from a 100% self-selected sample is the epitome of anti-statistics.

      Next you're going to argue for the robustness of the Slashdot Poll, aren't you?

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    7. Re:This is shit by deathinc · · Score: 1

      Touche!

      Another excellent addition... Now where did that article on that AMD chip go? :)

    8. Re:This is shit by redtuxxx · · Score: 0

      About as vaild as KDE being>50% based on the OSnews poll, which I have seen repeated ad nauseum

    9. Re:This is shit by bfields · · Score: 2
      As for the input being from voluntary users; you think they should have rounded up a few thousand people off the street, at gun point, and asked their opinioin? You're not making sense.

      No, they should have picked a few people at random and offered significant incentives to get a good response rate (an entry into a raffle plus an explanation of why their contribution would be helpful might be sufficient).

      It is an excellent report, regardless of your stand on open source. It would have been better if they could have had a larger sampling but, this is not always possible due to time or budgetary constraints.

      No, increasing the size of the sample wouldn't have helped; if you work out the statistics, I suspect you'd find that the size of their sample was already much higher than necessary. It's the quality of the sample that counts. Subtle biases in the choice of people that responded (in this case, they were much more likely to get people that visited certain websites) cause inaccuracies that no increase in sample size would help.

      Consider two surveys of preferences on presidential candidates; survey A was based on interviewing 200 people chosen uniformly at random from the set of registered voters; survey B was based on interviewing 2000 attendees of a Democratic convention; which result will be more accurate? The biases created by the self-selecting sample in this case may be more subtle than that, but I can think of some (I'm sure you can too), and I suspect a survey based on a more carefully chosen sample would give very different results.

      --Bruce F.

    10. Re:This is shit by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Lies, Damn Lies, Stastics, Benchmarks, Studies.

  11. Emacs sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When using emacs I tend to agree with those who say Stallman is a lunatic.
    And people would pay him for tutorials in this crap !?

  12. Most free software developers have a girlfriend by Elladan · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's true. Look at the study.

    Now, if we compare this to /., where approximately six people have a girlfriend, and half of them are girls, we must conclude that nobody on /. actually does anything useful.

    <G>

    1. Re:Most free software developers have a girlfriend by i0lanthe · · Score: 1
      It's true. Look at the study.

      I have no point here, I just like saying "I could more easily believe that two Yankee professors would lie than that stones would fall from heaven." ;-)

      (In any case, I think that all that we have really discovered for certain is that "most people who responded to this survey and claimed to be free software developers also claimed to be male and to have a significant other".)

      ... we must conclude that nobody on /. actually does anything useful.

      Now that, I can't quibble with.

      --
      "The Crystal Wind is the Storm, and the Storm is Data, and the Data is Life"
  13. Frumpf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frumpf... they should take a university mathematics class in statistics.

  14. Oh Duh! by ToasterTester · · Score: 1

    Let see a survey of mainly European developers prefer free software versus paying higher prices for import software (and hardware.) Geez this has been an reality for decades. Being I used to be a Marketing slime I'll throw in this was always a problem selling U.S. software outside the U.S. because of import costs. Also higher hardware costs outside the U.S. means they tend to run older hardware so they need software with less system requirements. Even more an issue in South America. So is anyone surprised that the results show a free OS that has less system requirements appeals to them. I'm suprised they felt they needed to do a survey to figure it out.

    Now they have good taste in editors vi rules! but poor taste in desktops. Gnome oh yuck, it is so five minutes ago.

  15. Vi can't indent highlighted blocks like Emacs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like that vi doesn't give me Emacs-pinky, but Eamcs has this command C-M-\ that automatically indents every highlighted line of C source code so you don't have to reindent it line by line. vi doesn't seem to have any such thing. Also, it is easy to bind keystrokes to your own functions in Emacs. I still haven't figured out how to make the spacebar do what Control-F does in normal mode (scroll down one screen) and backspace do what Control-B does (scroll up one screen) in vi.

    1. Re:Vi can't indent highlighted blocks like Emacs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Vi uses external filters. You run your text through indent(1).

      Learn how to use filters in vi. It's simple. It's fun.

  16. Vi and emacs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone written a vi clone in emacs-lisp yet? ;-)
    Seriously, vi is an editor; emacs is an operating system.

    1. Re:Vi and emacs by Theom · · Score: 0

      But it lacks a kernel! Emacs/Linux...

      --

      mp3: l33t term for empty.
    2. Re:Vi and emacs by dukerobillard · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, sure...GNU Emacs has shipped with vip-mode since the early 90's at least.

  17. They need a better survey by mustangdavis · · Score: 2, Troll

    It is obvious why open source isn't over taking the evil Microsoft empire .... look at the people that they surveyed for the answer:

    99% Males
    40% Single

    Hmmmmm .... Mainly single males .... maybe some of this stuff needs a women's touch (man, am I going to get flamed for saying that) ... but look at neopets.com. It is the most popular, free online game right now ... why???? Because women like it!!!!!!

    Back to the topic, I don't think that the sample of the population makes for a good survey ... it is skeewed towards software engineers. Where are the systems administrators and network administrators in that list?? I also didn't see that much in terms of University/public researchers .... they are the people that use this stuff!!! I think that the statistician that did this survey needs to go back to Probability & Statistics 101 ... and look at some of the fundemental rules for taking a survey.

    Debian as the favorite Linux distribution??? Gimme a break!

    Gnome?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

    I can't stop laughing!!!!

    These people must also work for Enron .... man can they skeew numbers!!!! (and I bet they're grant money was also listed as "soft money" ....)

    1. Re:They need a better survey by zmalone · · Score: 1

      40% single is not "mainly single", especially as there are only 2 answers there.

    2. Re:They need a better survey by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      20% were optimistic and predicted they wouldn't be single when the results were published.

      another 20% lied.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  18. Re:YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKER. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sleep on my desk top all the time... why is this such a hot topic? Beds are overreated.

  19. ITS OFFICIAL! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 5, Funny
    Great! So it's official! Emacs sucks and vi is best!

    q

    Q

    :qq

    ;quit

    ;alt_ctrl_del

    ;F4

    ;sh!t how do I exit this post?

    1. Re:ITS OFFICIAL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZZ

    2. Re:ITS OFFICIAL! by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      Just go :!q yourself ;p

    3. Re:ITS OFFICIAL! by Loligo · · Score: 2, Funny

      >;sh!t how do I exit this post?

      Ctrl-Shift-Meta-A Alt-Q.

    4. Re:ITS OFFICIAL! by isj · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of CVS log message that showed when one of the developers used to emacs was thrown into vi for editing commit messages:
      CVSr ------------------
      r on HP ^X^Z^Z^ZzzZZ

      I taunted him for a few days after that, and then taught him him to exit vi properly.

  20. Slashdot Math by 1000StonedMonkeys · · Score: 1

    GNOME the desktop the majority choose

    Not to nitpick, but since when did 33% constitute a majority? FYI, Gnome leads the poll at 33%, with KDE closely behind with 30%.

    1. Re:Slashdot Math by armyofone · · Score: 1

      Fifty percent doesn't necessarily make a majority in cases like this. Remember, GW Bush and Bill Clinton both won presidential elections with less than 50% of the vote.

      --
      "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
    2. Re:Slashdot Math by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Both Bush and Clinton won with a plurality, not a majority. Please pull out your dictionary.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    3. Re:Slashdot Math by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      They did both get a majority of electoral votes, which are the only ones that matter. Odd question, does anyone know what happens if no candidate gets a majority of electoral votes?

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    4. Re:Slashdot Math by J-Alan · · Score: 1

      The House of Representatives has a vote to decide the election.

    5. Re:Slashdot Math by armyofone · · Score: 1

      Ok - sorry if I used a bad analogy....

      But the point still stands. If there are more than two choices in a survey, then the most popular doesn't require a 50% share to 'win'. But then, you probably understood this to begin with. Right?

      --
      "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
    6. Re:Slashdot Math by orcrist · · Score: 1

      With the twist that each congressional delegation (all the representatives from a state) has 1 vote, e.g. all the Californian representatives would vote among themselves and then submit California's vote and so forth.

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
  21. Christ by FreeLinux · · Score: 1, Troll

    They all suck hard.

    Debian over Red Hat?
    VI over Emacs?
    Gnome over KDE????

    These are the worst representations from the open source community. Didn't anyone tell the people of the EU that they are free and they do have a choice. Don't they know that they can choose from the much better options and the Open Source software is all about the freedom of choice? Those poor oppressed bastards are suffering under the worst of open source and they say they like it.

  22. You gotta see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't like that, you should check out American Presidential elections.

    Majority rules. Hahaha

  23. Flawed Survey by Arandir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This survey consisted entirely of self-selected participants. The surveyors actually seemed to boast that they didn't select anyone themselves. This study is bogus and proves nothing.

    The staggering support for Debian (48%!) only proves that Debian developers are more successful in recruiting other Debian developers to participate in bogus online survey's. This isn't a dig against Debian, it's a dig against the silly methodology of this study.

    This survey, despite its seemingly thoroughness, is no more valid than the weekly Slashdot Poll. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this survey is that Debian, GNOME and vi users are more likely to participate in a self-selected survey than Redhat, SuSE, Mandrake, KDE and emacs users.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    1. Re:Flawed Survey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Debian sucks dude, they don't use tarballs and have to use packages like redhat. Go with gentoo and be happy as a tarbaby in a briar patch.

    2. Re:Flawed Survey by grex · · Score: 1
      Read my response to the same argument on a similar comment.

      You can see here where it was announced (there are more, but that's where I know of).

    3. Re:Flawed Survey by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      This survey, despite its seemingly thoroughness, is no more valid than the weekly Slashdot Poll.

      In fact, how can any poll claim any validity without including Cowboy Neal as an option?

  24. Self-selected sample by rubinson · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The problem with these results is that the sample was self-selected. Whoever wanted to respond to the survey could. So, these results don't tell us anything about the Free Software development community as a whole; rather it just tells us about those people who knew about the survey and chose to respond to it.

    Debian Weekly News comments on this in their latest issue:

    The FLOSS (see below) survey is finished and the results were posted. The most interesting bit is the number of Debian users among the participants, however, since we pointed out that survey, we may have contributed a little bit to the trend...

    1. Re:Self-selected sample by grex · · Score: 2, Informative
      You can see here where it has been announced. This are the weblogs and mailing lists I know of, there are sure multiple other sites and lists where this survey was announced.

      OTOH, if you have a look at other surveys (WIDI -
      final report), you'll see that Debian is among developers the preferred distribution. WIDI was announced in Slashdot (main page), Heise.de and several other news sites that aren't related to the Debian project.

    2. Re:Self-selected sample by Arandir · · Score: 2

      A quick check of WIDI shows that Debian gets a 26%. That's a far cry from the 48% this survey shows. As for the OSE study, Debian was one of their sample pools to start with, so of course it's going to be skewed in that direction.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  25. Other survey results... by Bonker · · Score: 5, Funny

    62.3% of Linux users have a (warezed) Windows 2000 partition so that they can play Warcraft III

    59.3% of Linux users prefer 'slender, young looking' anime babes to 'busty, voluptuous' anime babes.

    only 22.3% of Linux users really think Natalie Portman is all the good looking, even in tight white spandex. Most were just thankful that JarJar only got 2 scenes.

    93.2% of Linux users who read Slashdot have JonKatz permanently filtered.

    32.3% - Boxers
    44.1% - Tighty Whiteys
    22.3% - Flappin' in the wind, baby!

    62% of Linux users think that 'man' is a threatening name for a documentation application since it's vaguely homoerotic.

    58.3% of Linux users think that all polls about free software are orchestrated by Microsoft and are unwilling to trust the results, even if they are positive.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Other survey results... by Papineau · · Score: 2

      62.3% of Linux users have a (warezed) Windows 2000 partition so that they can play Warcraft III

      No need for that. Wine (and Winex) will play Warcraft III.

      And according to Blizzard and their crushing of bnetd, it's rather the opposite (62.3% of Linux users have a (warezed) version of Warcraft III)

    2. Re:Other survey results... by liquidsin · · Score: 5, Funny

      28.6% of poll respondents were confused by the lack of a "Cowboy Neal" option.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    3. Re:Other survey results... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      32.3% - Boxers
      44.1% - Tighty Whiteys
      22.3% - Flappin' in the wind, baby!


      These numbers can't be accurate, as it leaves only a possible 1.3% for "CowboyNeal"!

    4. Re:Other survey results... by Flarelocke · · Score: 1

      Another survey result:

      80% of all percentages are made up on the spot.

    5. Re:Other survey results... by PissingInTheWind · · Score: 1

      22.3% - Flappin' in the wind, baby!

      Just to add my 2 cents, I call that "going freestyle" :-)

      --

      A message from the system administrator: 'I've upped my priority. Now up yours.'
    6. Re:Other survey results... by mbadolato · · Score: 2

      99% of geeks that are constipated, really just don't give a shit

  26. No surprise there... by supabeast! · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "and vi more popular than Emacs."

    Wow, software developers aren't retards... who knew?

  27. Re:What are theese people thinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this post modded down? Take a look in the report yourselves!

  28. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1
    U KAN"T USE W!NDOWS ON LINUX!
    Wine?

    (Ah, and to the lameness filter: I'm not yelling myself, I just quote yelling.)
    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  29. not a complete survey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    They didn't count the results from Finnish users, otherwise you would have seen linux from scratch over debian, bash over gnome or kde and lynx over mozilla..

  30. Re:America is CRAZY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...20484 rapes every minute
    Each man, woman, and child in the US would have to be raped once every 9.1 days for that number to jive...

  31. Re:America is CRAZY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The original message was just a joke about that lame stallone movie and the numbers were, of course, inaccurate.

  32. I responded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't remember where i saw the servey either and i don't go arround seeking them out so it must have been quite prominent.

    Those who didn't respond might not put make much effort into other open source areas too.

  33. Re:Winnipeg SUCKS!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better than Anywhere in Ontario!!!!!!

  34. JonWho? by Alethes · · Score: 1
    93.2% of Linux users who read Slashdot have JonKatz permanently filtered.

    It's been so long since I did this, I forgot about JonKatz.

  35. Hmmmm by Aknaton · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised there isn't a troll posting "Emacs is dying" post like the "BSD is dying" posts.

  36. Survey by Aknaton · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see a high quality survey of users and developers of free OSes like GNU/Linux and the BSDs. Something really detailed with tons of questions.

    It would be interesting to see the results. Of course, I have no idea how you would keep fraud for messing up the stats for such a thing.

  37. The study recommends free software for govmnt. by Sgt.+Latino · · Score: 1, Informative

    FLOSS is not about the frivolous items discussed in the summary. The poll is only a small part of the study, which goes into great depth in the use and role of free software in companies and in government.

    It goes as far as recommending that EU states adopt legislation similar to the one proposed in Argentina, Perú, Colombia and others, mandating the use of free software in government for security reasons. Section 4.2

  38. Majority? by John+Harrison · · Score: 3, Insightful
    GNOME the desktop the majority choose

    Gnome 32.52%
    KDE 30.05%
    Mac 2.3%
    Pure Text 8.37%
    Windows 3.56%
    Other 23.19%

    Since when is 32.52% a majority? This is less than one third, and certainly not more than half, which is waht was indicated by the summary. Of course, I am an idiot for expecting accuracy on /., right?

  39. Missing question by Salamander · · Score: 2

    I really wish they had asked how people find time to develop open-source software. We couldn't expect completely honest answers, of course, but it's always interesting to see how many people not only do open-source work when they're supposed to be doing something else (e.g. paid work or study) but even admit that they do so. A similar question would be about what effects the expenditure of time on open-source projects has had on other aspects of people's lives - e.g. flunked out of school, got fired, lost a girlfriend, etc.

    I know that many do open-source work entirely on their own time (or get paid to do it) and manage to find a balance between that and other aspects of their lives. I don't mean to imply otherwise. I just think that any sociological study of open-source developers should pay at least some attention to this "darker side" in addition to the by-now-overdone philosophical and work-habit questions.

    --
    Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
  40. +1: Very, very insightful by grex · · Score: 1

    Really, this comment hits the target!

    (it seems that you've really read the documents) :-)

  41. vi rules by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    quantitatively!

  42. This is the silliest story ever on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are to expect Lunix users, especially whiny eurotrash ones to floss? Ridiculous!

  43. I agree with you except in this by snowcold · · Score: 1
    The most honest and conscientious political leader in the country, Ralph Nader, is a powerless, near invisible curiosity easily side-lined by hired goons.

    America is run by a mod of globalist, multiculturalists, homosexual Jews. Nader is a sucker. Join The National Alliance (there's even a Canadian Chapter)