BT Loses Case Over Hyperlink Patent
Tarkie sent in this Bloomberg blurb noting that British Telecom has lost their patent suit against Prodigy over an old patent that BT hoped would cover the use of hyperlinks on the modern WWW. See our original story or check out the court's decision.
I wonder if I can get a refund. I knew I shouldn't have paid for all my future linking in advance.
I think my reaction to BT losing is along the lines of "pleasently surprised." Which means I must be getting very cynical.
At least the Onion had intended the humor...
"Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."
If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
They lost the case on the kind of picky interpretation of words that, in everyday life, any sane person would just laugh off as irrelevant. There was absolutely nothing along the lines of, "look, your claim is idiotic, and you know it, now go away."
"Look, dude, we know you're guilty, so we're just going to skip the details and throw you in jail."
I believe that official (but not publicised) US government policy encourages US patent office to award as many silly patents as possible to US companies. It is a valid way to stimulate national industry. Due to its overwhelming superiority, the US is the only country that can enforce its laws abroad.
The example of British company losing its patent claim in the US court to a US company doesn't disprove above point.
--