Slashdot Mirror


The Square Kilometer Array

EyesWideOpen writes "A very ambitious project to build the world's largest radio telescope, named the Square Kilometer Array or SKA, is in its early design stages. As its name suggests the SKA will be one square kilometer in size if it gets built. The SKA consortium (consisting of Cal Tech, Cornell, SETI, the Max Planck Institute and Beijing Astronomical Observatory to name a few) hopes to build the telescope by 2010. "If they succeed the SKA will be so big and precise it will jump the world's current best, the American Very Large Array in New Mexico, by a factor of 100, both in sensitivity and resolution." It's interesting to note that the project is based on technology that will only exist in three, five or seven years -- to account for data rates of tens to hundreds of terabytes per second and storage in the petabytes -- so they're counting on Moore's law to hold true."

1 of 131 comments (clear)

  1. Why bigger is better by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Informative
    The reason radio telescopes have to be so much larger than their optical counterparts is due to the wavelengths they are looking for. For a given observation aperture, there's a simple rule-of-thumb which goes:


    Voltage gain ~= circumference / wavelength.

    ... with the power gain (the "magnification") being the voltage gain squared.

    Given that the wavelength of 'visible' light is approximately half a million times shorter than radio wave wavelengths, the collecting area has to be much larger to get the same antennae gain.

    An interesting corollary of this is that the naked eye is (very roughly) as powerful (at visible light wavelengths) as Arecibo is (at radio wavelengths). See the The seti league pages for more info...

    Simon.
    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!