New MP3 License Terms Demand $0.75 Per Decoder
Götz writes "The licensing terms of Thomson and the Fraunhofer Gesellschaft, who are the owners of the mp3 patents, have changed. Now not only mp3 encoders but also
mp3 decoders require a license. This page lists the fees -- it's $0.75 per decoder. As a consequence, Red Hat has already removed all mp3 players from the Rawhide development version."
thank god for freedom of speech
Damn them!
This isn't the sig you are looking for... Carry on...
I see... Yes, on the horizon, here it is... It's Ogg Vorbis, taking the lead as everybody bails on MP3! If only the name weren't so silly...
The Humblest Mollusk on the Net
Where and BS!
Actually, a moderator should mod up the post he/she feels is more interesting/insightful/... and leave the other alone (or mod it up too). Modding down should be reserved for trolls and flaimbait. The nature of the moderation system itself causes the 'redundant' choice to be... well... redundant as redundant posts will remain low if ignored by the moderators.
Moderation is supposed to promote good discussions, not bitch slap someone for not posting fast enough.
Moderators are insane. I see no evidence that meta moderation works (as I've suspected all along) and I am consistently disappointed with the results of the system.
There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
Max V.
NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
nothing really. Just trying to be the 1000th post. I hear Taco gets a bonus if they go over 1000.
AC wrote: " Those don't mail well, as they gum up the mail sorting machines at the post office. You'd just be annoying the wrong people."
... maybe I'll just send them a reminder postcard.
You mean it's all-purpose?! I wonder when the Justice Dept. is going to get around to the enforced-monopoly USPS
timothy
jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
hey, nice sig.