More About The .org Reassignment

Posted by ryuzaki0 on Saturday August 31, 2002 @09:34AM from the organismus dept.

Joel Rowbottom writes: "After ICANN 'awarded' ISOC with the running of .ORG in the Draft Staff Report, public comments regarding the process are starting to come out of the woodwork. Eric Brunner-Williams has commented on the flawed scoring and ICANN allegedly using the process to financially shore up ISOC and Afilias; the dotORG Foundation have posted some comments and questions (quote: 'we are perplexed by the Academic CIO Team's rating of our bid's technology as marginal'); Carl Malamud has posted the IMS/ISC response; and Organic have posted a rather damning indictment of the process as well (disclaimer: I work for Organic Names). For the $27,000 it cost each bidder to 'participate' (and that's just the entry fee), we'd have expected a little more professionalism than just getting some 'free' t-shirts! Comment to ICANN today org-eval@icann.org and make a difference."

4 of 98 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

first by Anonymous Coward · 2002-08-31 09:37 · Score: -1, Offtopic

suck it bitches!!!
The fact of the matter of the whole dot org by Anonymous Coward · 2002-08-31 09:46 · Score: -1, Offtopic

situation is that No One Gives A Shit!
RIAA website hacked by Anonymous Coward · 2002-08-31 10:35 · Score: -1, Offtopic

dsfgousdfyg odfs gsdf osdfg sad ofusdgsdoaf dofgh os sg.
That's way too funny... by unsinged+int · 2002-08-31 11:20 · Score: 1, Offtopic

I thought that was a joke as the site should be www.riaa.com....but they both have the same thing. Incredible.