Slashdot Mirror


Google Disappears In China

An anonymous reader submits: "The censorship in China was finally getting better since people were 'allowed' to read the CNN news now (except for certain articles). But since this weekend it seems that a new web page has been censored in China. Since this weekend it looks like everyone in China is not 'allowed' to use google.com anymore. google.com was also gaining populairity in China as the better search engine (which also works fine in Chinese). But now I guess it got too popular and thus not allowed. Or does it have anything to do with Yahoo signing the agreement to censor?" Comments to yesterday's post "Real-Time Testing of China's Internet Filters" also noted that Google has gone missing within China.

8 of 334 comments (clear)

  1. Cache by Stormie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Surely it's because Google's cache would allow people inside the Great Firewall to read all manner of banned web pages?

  2. the reason by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google's cached page feature could give anyone in china the ability to see any censored sites (or at least older copies).

    --
    GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
  3. Rumors by jsse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's no source, no reference; just a wild rumors from an anonymous coward. I don't believe /. editors would down to spreading FUD for a few extra hits.

    In China there are some search engines like Yam which is google based and use google's queries. Even if you haven't heard of Yam, you might have heard of a China based search engine company suing Yahoo for stealing queries. Yam is more popular than Google here.

    If they block Google they might have to block Yam as well, which would then be a real chaos. :)

  4. Re:censorship--it's all the rage by fireboy1919 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah...why, just the other day, a friend of mine was "censored" when the army came and took him away for publically speaking out against the government. Later, there was a report on the news that he was to be imprisoned, tortured, and shot.

    He was part of a rally in Times Square, and they arrested him. Sucks that we live in a country without peaceable assembly.

    Wait...I think it was actually someone I didn't know who was killed in Tiananmen square for a pro-democracy demonstration.

    I think I got it straight now. The US is NOTHING like China when it comes to censorship. We don't imprison and kill people because we don't like what they say. We certainly don't use full force; on the contrary, our main censorship punishment is fines, or at the very most, a minimum security prison sentence. Of course, you have to consider that we are not trying to censor, our goal is to avoid copyright violations. You can say anything you want, as long as it isn't libel (untrue statement of FACTS - all opinions are allowed).

    Don't belittle our freedom or China's suffering by such a comparison.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  5. Quote by Raul654 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When I read articles like this, a quote from Alpha Centauri (the video game) comes to mind:

    As the Americans learned so painfully in Earth's final century, free flow of information is the only safeguard against tyranny. The once-chained people whose leaders at last lose their grip on information flow will soon burst with freedom and vitality, but the free nation gradually constricting its grip on public discourse has begun its rapid slide into despotism. Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
    Commissioner Pravin Lal
    "U.N. Declaration of Rights"


    And every one of these articles I see reinforces that belief.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  6. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by jukal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    > if a country can't cope with its inhabitants having a wide range
    > of views, it has problems all its own.

    The problem is that majority of people think that they have formed their opinion after inspecting a wide range of views (as there's free speech, this must be the case, right?) - when in reality their opinion was formed by only 1 or 2 views that reflect the view of a very small interest group or they formed their opinion based on biased "information".

    You saw it in TV news, it must be true - effect.

  7. Re:More on the Great Firewall of China by ptbrown · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If someone is operating a web proxy to bypass the Great Firewall, that's great.

    But a web proxy isn't the same thing as an open SMTP relay. Anyone with one of those should be shot, burned, dragged through the streets naked, and then really punished.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced civilization is indistinguishable from Gods.
  8. Re:More on the Great Firewall of China by wumingzi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Interesting. If they're indeed left open for that reason, I'd almost change my opinion of the admins running them...

    Another helpful poster pointed out the difference between a web proxy and an open mail server.

    A proxy server is only useful if it is outside of the routers which do the filtering, i.e. outside of the PRC.

    Most of the open mail relays in Asia are just due to ham-handed systems administration. There are lots of small companies running mail and web servers, and not nearly enough qualified people to administer them.

    j.