Several Extrasolar Planets May Be Optical Illusions
person-0.9a writes "Seems that a few of the extrasolar planets detected via their sun's wobble might be written off according to a CNN article. You can also read it about it in New Scientist."
Planetary transit searches will be subject to sunspots as a noise source (star's light changing by small amounts, erratically), but are unlikely to be fooled by them. A planetary transit causes the star's light to dim in a distinct flat-bottomed way that a sunspot cannot mimic.
Note also that no one has discovered a planet yet using the transit-search technique. The transiting planet of Henry & Charbonneau was known to exist already thanks to the spectroscopic surveys.
-Renard
(preface: yes, I Am An Astronomer)
The important thing to realize is that you're measuring the spectrum integrated over the entire surface of the star WEIGHTED BY THE FLUX (read: brightness) AT THAT PART OF THE SURFACE.
The star is rotating, so part of the star is moving away from us and is red-shifted, while part is moving toward us and is blue-shifted. If the surface were all radiating at the same level, then we'd always see part of the spectrum blue-shifted and part red-shifted.
Now stick a big starspot on. The starspot is fainter than the rest of the star. When the starspot is on the approaching side of the star, there is less blue-shifted light and so the net spectrum appears slightly red-shifted. Half a period later, the starspot is on the receding side of the star so there is less red-shifted light, and the net spectrum appears slightly blue-shifted.
The end result is a spectrum that systematically shifts back and forth, very similar to that of a star with an orbiting planet.
[TMB]