Slashdot Mirror


BBC Hails "fair" Microsoft XP SP1

Richard Bown writes "Continuing their current trend of only giving you half the story the BBC have this article on how fair and equitable Microsoft are these days. No mention of EULA changes."

16 of 458 comments (clear)

  1. Karma Whoring by Wind_Walker · · Score: 5, Informative
    I think I'll link to a similar article at CNN. It's a bit less biased.

    And, for anybody who is using XP, they say that the software (like IE, Media Player, etc) is hidden. But if I double-click on an HTML file, does it come up in IE anyways? Or does it say "File type not recognized"?

    </Karma Whoring>

    1. Re:Karma Whoring by clontzman · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's actually at the root of the Start Menu and has been added to the left-hand nav of the Add/Remove Programs dialogue. I looked at it and it seemed fairly free of threats. You can say, "Use Microsoft programs," "Use current programs" or "Custom."

    2. Re:Karma Whoring by ncc74656 · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's actually at the root of the Start Menu and has been added to the left-hand nav of the Add/Remove Programs dialogue.

      Win2K SP3 adds a similar feature...but I'd recommend against installing it. In addition to the issues previously noted WRT SP3, I've found it's great at destabilizing Win2K. Two of my machines started bluescreening whenever a DirectShow filter graph involving their webcams (Orange Micro iBots) was closed, and I just spent the past weekend in Phoenix reloading everything on my father's computer because SP3 hosed his MSN setup and caused printing to run at a glacial pace. Now that all of the affected machines have been put back to SP2, all is well with the world again.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    3. Re:Karma Whoring by unitron · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nice to see someone else who knows about Major Armstrong and that it wasn't just Farnsworth that got screwed over by "General" Sarnoff. A good biography of Armstrong (if you haven't read it yet and can find an old copy somewhere) is "Man of High Fidelity" by Lawrence Lessing.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Re:Not that this is a warez site or anything by Schnapple · · Score: 3, Informative

    The word is that there are two widely circulated keys in particular that are targeted. Not sure if SP1 will disable those systems or if it will just refuse to install

  4. Not True. by NetJunkie · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can put in a new serial number on a running system. Do a quick search on deja and you'll find it.

  5. Re:So how is the story unfair? by ericman31 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The main problem with this article is that BBC makes it sound as if there was already a final settlement in the anti-trust case. Nowhere in the entire article do they point out that there is only a proposed settlement, and that Microsoft's actions are being taken to try and forestall more restrictive penalties by the government. And, finally, the method used for "hiding" the MS software doesn't help much for those who don't want to use them because the other software manufacturers have to write their software to take advantage of the changes. Of course none have done it yet, so you actually cannot change your default browser to Netscape right now, no matter what MS says.

    None of that is MS bashing. This is. MS is a monopoly. They know they are a monopoly. People like Steve Ballmer within the executive circle of MS have no intention of letting go of their monopoly. Unless Judge Kollar-Kotelly takes very restrictive and punitive measures against MS they will just continue to do this, again and again. The obvious solution, one which would actually benefit the country economically, is to first penalize the company for it's actions, and then, after the penalty phase, split the company into at least two parts, perhaps three, with each new company restricted in a fashion that will help to prevent future monopolistic behavior. The first time I bought MS Office (Office 95 Pro) its cost was 10% of the cost of a reasonable PC ($200 vs. $2,000). Now the cost of MS Office is $499 (Office XP Pro). A reasonable PC is about $1,000 (office automation, web surfing, etc. not a gaming machine). Not only is Office XP not 250% better than Office 95, it's not even 100% better. I refuse to use Office anymore. Unfortunately at work I have to, since it is our company standard. That may change, according to some rumblings I'm hearing. In the meantime I will never again spend any of my own money on MS products.

    --
    In my universe I'm perfectly normal, it's not my fault you don't live in my universe.
  6. Re:Not that this is a warez site or anything by BiggyP · · Score: 2, Informative

    nope, he'd just have to use a generator with a valid license key to produce a valid product key and edit about 5 registry entries replace the old ID with the new product key and reboot, then tryu again, it might break windows update, but it should allow the service pack, worked for the betas anyway.

  7. Re:Not that this is a warez site or anything by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Informative

    It won't install on a copy with the infamous FCKGW-... key from the Devil's Own release, released months before XP went retail. They also disabled another one, which is pretty unknown and not at all as wide spread it seems.

    Some are saying that MS disabled all serials for the "Corporate Edition" starting with F and P.

    What happens if installing on SP1 with the FCKGW key then?

    You'll get a message similar to "this key is pirated -- blabla -- you need to immediately obtain a legal key". Then I recall your copy of XP needs activation and you get this timer before it's *completely* deactivated and you're *forced* to phone MS to use the crap. :-)

    Needless to say, there are ways to change a key before installing SP1 without uninstalling XP.

    Also, there are a key generator (yes, that "Blue List keygen") available for XP that generates keys not detected as illegal by SP1.

    So, in the end, not much has been changed in the warez scene from this. Integrated Windows XP SP1 Corp Ed. ISO's with working serials are already floating around.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  8. Re:So, Is SP1 out? by Tim+C · · Score: 3, Informative

    As you used Windows Update, it almost certainly worked out what components you require, and downloaded only those. The 133meg file size would be for the whole thing, including updates for components that you don't have installed and/or don't come with your version of XP (i.e. Home vs. Pro, language/locale, etc).

    If you look around on the Microsoft site, you'll find that there's a "network install" (or similar) version of the service pack, that's the entire thing in one file. It's designed for sites that may have a variety of different configurations installed, so they can essentially mirror it locally. 133meg sounds about right for that sort of service pack (the Windows 2000 ones have generally been around the 100+meg mark).

    Cheers,

    Tim

  9. Re:133MB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Do you honestly belive 133 megs is just for that? Or do you not relase it's a SERVICE PACK, which means it services flaws, mistakes, etc in old software. It's a glorifed patch!

  10. Re:I don't see the story. by griblik · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think the issue here is the way the changes are portrayed.

    When I RTFA, it seemed to suggest that Microsoft has made major concessions to the world's anti-monopoly bodies by removing a few icons from the desktop and start menu, and that MS is now a much nicer company, having given in to the little people.

    The problem there is that most people assume that if the icon's not there, neither is the program. Not everyone's as tech-savvy as the average /. reader - if they can't see it, how do they tell the difference? If the BBC says it's an improvement, surely it must be?

    Mainstream media educates the public, and it'd be good to get mainstream media to understand the issues and technology involved (don't forget, the writers at the BBC are professional _writers_, not coders).

    If you think this 'change' has been misrepresented to Joe Public, mail the BBC and let them know what's up. You can't fault them for not knowing everything, but you can let them know where _you_ think they've got it wrong.

    btw, please be nice - this bunch are usually good enough to have a real person reply to your comments. Show a little respect for people doing something right ;)

    --
    Warning: May contain nuts
  11. Re:Hiding them? Get rid of them! by Dirtside · · Score: 3, Informative

    You do understand that there's a difference between a company that gets a monopoly because it simply has a better product, and a company that gets a monopoly because of unfair business practices? "Monopoly" doesn't automatically equal "anticompetetive." Besides, if everyone uses Linux all of a sudden, who has the monopoly? Red Hat? Gentoo? Mandrake? Slackware? Debian? Linus Torvalds himself?

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  12. This /. item is utter, utter crap by nagora · · Score: 5, Informative
    For the hard-of-reading the posted BBC item says:
    1. MS have made changes due to a ruling on "fair" competition. The word "equitable" does not appear anywhere in the story,
    2. That MS has been "found guilty of abusing its market dominance",
    3. That the DOJ thought that MS was abusing its market share,
    4. That nine states are holding out and that a ruling is pending, and
    5. People have been installing software to cut out some of MS's crap already (PC Lite).

    The item could have gone into more detail but what it does say is pretty straight-down-the-line factual and is not "half the story" as the poster claimed. Sure, there's no mention of EULA changes but, since they're not legally binding anyway who gives a toss? It's only a small piece, not the history of Windows!

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  13. Here's the FULL EULA for SP1 by Trillian_1138 · · Score: 1, Informative

    SUPPLEMENTAL END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

    IMPORTANT: READ CAREFULLY - This
    Supplemental End User License Agreement
    ("Supplemental EULA") is a legal agreement
    between you (either an individual or a single
    entity) and Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") for the Microsoft
    software that accompanies this Supplemental EULA, which
    includes computer software and may include associated media,
    printed materials, "online" or electronic documentation,
    and Internet-based services (the "OS Components").
    The OS Components are provided to update, supplement,
    or replace existing functionality of the applicable
    Microsoft software for which the OS Components
    are designed (any such software referred to here as "OS
    Software"). An amendment or addendum to this
    Supplemental EULA may accompany the OS Components.
    YOU AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THE
    APPLICABLE OS SOFTWARE END USER LICENSE
    AGREEMENT ("OS SOFTWARE EULA") AND THIS
    SUPPLEMENTAL EULA BY INSTALLING, COPYING, OR
    OTHERWISE USING THE OS COMPONENTS. IF YOU DO
    NOT AGREE, DO NOT INSTALL, COPY, OR USE THE
    OS COMPONENTS.

    IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A VALIDLY LICENSED COPY OF
    THE APPLICABLE OS SOFTWARE, YOU ARE NOT
    AUTHORIZED TO INSTALL, COPY OR OTHERWISE USE
    THE OS COMPONENTS AND YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS
    UNDER THIS SUPPLEMENTAL EULA.

    General.

    * Microsoft grants you a license to use the OS Components
    under the terms and conditions of the OS Software EULA
    (which are hereby incorporated by reference except as
    set forth below), the terms and conditions set forth in
    this Supplemental EULA, and the terms and conditions of
    any additional end user license agreement that may
    accompany the individual OS Components (each an
    "Individual EULA"), provided that you comply with all
    such terms and conditions. To the extent that there is
    a conflict among any of these terms and conditions
    applicable to the OS Components, the following hierarchy
    shall apply: 1) the terms and conditions of the
    Individual EULA; 2) the terms and conditions in this
    Supplemental EULA; and 3) the terms and conditions of the
    applicable OS Software EULA.

    * The OS Components are protected by copyright and other
    intellectual property laws and treaties. Microsoft or its
    suppliers own the title, copyright, and other intellectual
    property rights in the OS Components. Microsoft reserves
    all rights not expressly granted to you in this Supplemental
    EULA. The OS Components are licensed, not sold.

    * Capitalized terms used in this Supplemental EULA and not
    otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to
    them in the applicable OS Software EULA.

    Additional Rights and Limitations.

    * You may reproduce, install and use one copy of the OS
    Components on each of your computers that is running a
    validly licensed copy of the applicable OS Software,
    provided that you use each such additional copy of the OS
    Components in accordance with the terms and conditions of
    this Supplemental EULA.

    * Solely for the purpose of preventing unlicensed use of the
    applicable OS Software, the OS Components will include
    installation on your computer of technological measures that
    are designed to prevent unlicensed use, and Microsoft may
    use this technology to confirm that you have a licensed copy
    of the OS Software. The update of these technological
    measures only occurs through the installation of these OS
    Components. The OS Components will not install on
    unlicensed copies of the OS Software. If you are not using
    a licensed copy of the OS Software, you are not allowed to
    install the OS Components or future OS Software updates.
    Microsoft will not collect any personally identifiable
    information from your computer during this process.

    * The OS Components may include the Microsoft .NET
    Framework. You may not disclose the results of any
    benchmark test of the .NET Framework to any third party
    without Microsoft's prior written approval.

    * Solely with respect to the OS Components, if the licensor of
    the applicable OS Software was an entity other than
    Microsoft, then for the purposes of this Supplemental EULA
    Microsoft is the licensor with respect to such OS Components
    in lieu of the "Manufacturer" or other entity. Manufacturer
    or such other entity has no obligation under this
    Supplemental EULA to provide support for such OS
    Components. With respect to the existing functionality
    contained in the applicable OS Software that is not updated,
    supplemented, or replaced by the OS Components, the OS
    Software EULA provided by the Manufacturer or other
    licensing entity shall remain in full force and effect as
    to that OS Software.

    IF THE APPLICABLE OS SOFTWARE WAS LICENSED TO
    YOU BY MICROSOFT OR ANY OF ITS WHOLLY OWNED
    SUBSIDIARIES, THE LIMITED WARRANTY (IF ANY)
    INCLUDED IN THE APPLICABLE OS SOFTWARE EULA
    APPLIES TO THE OS COMPONENTS, PROVIDED THAT
    THE OS COMPONENTS HAVE BEEN LICENSED BY YOU
    WITHIN THE TERM OF THE LIMITED WARRANTY IN
    THE APPLICABLE OS SOFTWARE EULA. HOWEVER,
    THIS SUPPLEMENTAL EULA DOES NOT EXTEND THE
    TIME PERIOD FOR WHICH THE LIMITED WARRANTY IS
    PROVIDED.

    IF THE APPLICABLE OS SOFTWARE WAS LICENSED TO
    YOU BY AN ENTITY OTHER THAN MICROSOFT OR ANY
    OF ITS WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES, MICROSOFT
    DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH RESPECT TO THE
    OS COMPONENTS AS FOLLOWS:

    DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES. TO THE MAXIMUM
    EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, MICROSOFT
    AND ITS SUPPLIERS PROVIDE TO YOU THE OS
    COMPONENTS, AND SUPPORT SERVICES (IF ANY) AS
    IS AND WITH ALL FAULTS; AND MICROSOFT AND ITS
    SUPPLIERS HEREBY DISCLAIM ALL OTHER
    WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS, WHETHER EXPRESS,
    IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
    LIMITED TO, ANY (IF ANY) IMPLIED WARRANTIES,
    DUTIES OR CONDITIONS OF MERCHANTABILITY, OF
    FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OF
    RELIABILITY OR AVAILABILITY, OF ACCURACY OR
    COMPLETENESS OF RESPONSES, OF RESULTS, OF
    WORKMANLIKE EFFORT, OF LACK OF VIRUSES, AND
    OF LACK OF NEGLIGENCE, ALL WITH REGARD TO THE
    OS COMPONENTS, AND THE PROVISION OF OR
    FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUPPORT OR OTHER SERVICES,
    INFORMATION, SOFTWARE, AND RELATED CONTENT
    THROUGH THE OS COMPONENTS OR OTHERWISE
    ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF THE OS COMPONENTS.
    ALSO, THERE IS NO WARRANTY OR CONDITION OF
    TITLE, QUIET ENJOYMENT, QUIET POSSESSION,
    CORRESPONDENCE TO DESCRIPTION OR NON
    -INFRINGEMENT WITH REGARD TO THE OS
    COMPONENTS.

    EXCLUSION OF INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL AND
    CERTAIN OTHER DAMAGES. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT
    PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO EVENT
    SHALL MICROSOFT OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE
    FOR ANY SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE,
    INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
    WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
    DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS OR CONFIDENTIAL
    OR OTHER INFORMATION, FOR BUSINESS
    INTERRUPTION, FOR PERSONAL INJURY, FOR LOSS
    OF PRIVACY, FOR FAILURE TO MEET ANY DUTY
    INCLUDING OF GOOD FAITH OR OF REASONABLE
    CARE, NEGLIGENCE, AND ANY OTHER PECUNIARY
    OR OTHER LOSS WHATSOEVER) ARISING OUT OF OR
    IN ANY WAY RELATED TO THE USE OF OR
    INABILITY TO USE THE OS COMPONENTS,
    THE PROVISION OF OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE
    SUPPORT OR OTHER SERVICES, INFORMATION,
    SOFTWARE, AND RELATED CONTENT THROUGH THE OS
    COMPONENTS OR OTHERWISE ARISING OUT OF THE
    USE OF THE OS COMPONENTS, OR OTHERWISE UNDER
    OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY PROVISION OF THIS
    SUPPLEMENTAL EULA, EVEN IN THE EVENT OF THE
    FAULT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE),
    MISREPRESENTATION, STRICT OR PRODUCT
    LIABILITY, BREACH OF CONTRACT OR BREACH OF
    WARRANTY OF MICROSOFT OR ANY SUPPLIER, AND
    EVEN IF MICROSOFT OR ANY SUPPLIER HAS BEEN
    ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILTY OF SUCH DAMAGES.

    LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND REMEDIES.
    NOTWITHSTANDING ANY DAMAGES THAT YOU MIGHT
    INCUR FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING,
    WITHOUT LIMITATION, ALL DAMAGES REFERENCED
    ABOVE AND ALL DIRECT OR GENERAL DAMAGES IN
    CONTRACT OR ANYTHING ELSE), THE ENTIRE
    LIABILITY OF MICROSOFT AND ANY OF ITS
    SUPPLIERS UNDER ANY PROVISION OF THIS
    SUPPLEMENTAL EULA AND YOUR EXCLUSIVE REMEDY
    FOR ALL OF THE FOREGOING SHALL BE LIMITED TO
    THE GREATER OF THE ACTUAL DAMAGES YOU INCUR
    IN REASONABLE RELIANCE ON THE SOFTWARE UP TO
    THE AMOUNT ACTUALLY PAID BY YOU FOR THE OS
    COMPONENTS OR U.S.$5.00. THE FOREGOING
    LIMITATIONS, EXCLUSIONS AND DISCLAIMERS SHALL
    APPLY TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY
    APPLICABLE LAW, EVEN IF ANY REMEDY FAILS ITS
    ESSENTIAL PURPOSE.