BBC Hails "fair" Microsoft XP SP1
Richard Bown writes "Continuing their current trend of only giving you half the story the BBC have
this article on how fair and equitable Microsoft are these days. No mention of EULA changes."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
Is the article accurate? The settlement was just to "hide" the bundled software? There was no part indicating that the services offered to IE, Outlook, Media Player, etc by the OS have to be available to competitors, so that they can integrate and interoperate as seamlessly? No wonder 9 states dissented.
11*43+456^2
UK companies that have taken data from me can-not agree to the terms of Microsoft's ELUA, any company found agreeing to the terms will be violating the data protection act by potentially allowing Microsoft to access my data.
thank God the internet isn't a human right.
Since many under the age of 18 use computers, can a EULA be binding on a minor?
I've asked this many times of many, and I've never received any response other than a shrug.
You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
What happens to Windows Update, which requires the use of MSIE, if a user chooses to "hide" the MSIE browser? How is that user going to download the inevitable patches that will be needed for XP SP1? Is Microsoft providing a new stand-alone update application (a la Apple's "Software Update"), and if so, how secure is it? Or, have they retooled Windows Update to work with non-MSIE browsers?
Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
Found this earlier today:
/ SP /SP1/WXP/en-us/xpsp1_en_x86.exe
http://www.trwxp.kit.net/xp_sp1.html
Also, a download for SP1:
http://download.microsoft.com/download/whistler
This thing is a fucking pig... 137MB.. Woah! Lots of bugs...er..features fixed here.
Corporatism != Free Market