Judge Says Paypal's Arbitration Rules Unfair
MooRogue points to this article in today's San Francisco Chronicle, which reports U.S. District Court Judge Jeremy Fogel's ruling that Paypal "attempts to isolate itself from challenges," noting "Judge Fogel also refused to dismiss the class-action lawsuit going against Paypal." I guess I've been lucky with PayPal so far, but I know a few people who haven't.
I used PayPal earlier this year to accept credit card payments for a seminar I co-produced. It all went very smoothly: following the instructions in their online manual, I was able to add the Paypal button to my website and also pre-populate the signup form for new PayPal users.
Best of all, the fees were only $0.30 plus 2.9% per transaction, with no monthly minimum, terminal fees, etc. like with a standard credit card processor. This page at PalPal shows the comparison.
To me, this means that accepting credit card payments is not just a privilege of those who can "qualify" at a bank, but available to anyone with just a painless web signup. And the fees are less too.
If PayPal can ever get its customer service act together, it will really give banks a challenge. The credit card processors don't care: they're getting huge traffic from PayPal.
Doesn't delete your account even if you specifically ask them to do so after many emails, fax, etc... and if that wasn't enough, they still spam you with their newsletter and promotion...
I mean, it was one thing that they didn't give me that 5$ credit when my friend added himself, and sent them a message to confirm that he got refered by me, but blattantly spamming and keeping your information in their database like this even after repeated requests is just plain wrong.
At least I'm lucky, I didn't do the mistake of running a merchant service with them, especially after all the horror stories I've heard.
--- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
If the issue is with PayPal, you forgo your right to sue for "binding arbitration" (read:a private court that will almost certainly be in PayPal's favor), IIRC. Hopefully, the class action suit will put an end to that nonsense.
Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
no
ebay is dropping their cc service in favor of paypal.
Do you even lift?
These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.
also: paypalwarning.com.
Ok, so paypal sucks. Are there any good alternatives though?
Yes.
They are FDIC insured, so you have some recourse if they screw you.
If you're unhappy with PayPal, PayPalWarning.com lists a bunch of phone numbers. Call (877) 672-9725 if you want to reach them toll free.
Here's a bunch of known paypal numbers:
(402) 935-2000 / (402) 935-2001 / (402) 935-2062 / (402) 935-2258 [this is Craig, complaints resolution manager] / (402) 935-7733 / (402) 537-5740 (fax) / (650) 251-1100 / (888) 221-1161 / (800) 836-1859 / (877) 672-9725 / (866) 272-9725
And addresses, in case you need to send a process server or wish to register a complaint in person:
PayPal, Inc.
1840 Embarcadero Rd.
Palo Alto, CA 943030
PayPal, Inc.
11128 John Galt Blvd.
Omaha, NE 68137
I signed up for paypal because it was the only way someone who had something I wanted to buy would accept payment. But I wouldn't allow them access to my checking account. They won't let you spend more than $250 through their service unless you allow them direct access to your checking account.
After reading PayPalWarning.com, I decided that I never would use them again.
I was unaware until recently that by giving PayPal access to your checking account, you forgo the liability protections that a credit card vendor is required to give you.
So if you pay a lot of money through paypal for some merchandise you never receive, you basically have no legal recourse - you're screwed. If you had paid with a credit card, you could dispute the charge with your credit card company and they'd have to give you your money back.
I think I'll call Craig when I get up and ask him to delete my account.
-- Could you use my software consulting serv