Slashdot Mirror


Where The Bandwidth Goes

An anonymous reader writes "An often overlooked fact about network bandwidth utilization is that the bandwidth consumed on networks is more than the sum of the data exchanged at the highest level; it's data+overhead+upkeep. In the early 90's I worked for a large multi-national company whose software engineering department had a transatlantic x.25 circuit connection to it's European engineering headquarters. It was necessary that the connection be 'on' 24x7 due to the spanning of a large number of time zones, disparate working hours and tight contractual requirements. Very large data transfers were sometimes operationally essential. But the financial people used to scream constantly about the circuit costs (charged per packet, IIRC) of several thousand dollars/month. The sys admin realized that if he just reduced the frequency of keep-alives, he could shave something like 10% off the monthly bill. This article points out that p2p applications are greater bandwidth hogs than one might think because of the foregoing and more - they also search, accept pushed advertising and do other transactions that are transparent to most users, but add up. I doubt that developers of those free p2p applications have gave much thought to efficiency. This will be no surprise to many of you, but helps explain why ISP's rushing to put caps on transfers."

2 of 322 comments (clear)

  1. This just in: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    No shit, sherlock.

    This isn't news for nerds, it's news for fucking imbiciles. Who reads slashdot that wouldn't know this already?

  2. *BSD priorites found dead in penis bird! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    (everybody sing along now...)

    It's been ONE YEAR since the WORST TERRORIST ATTACK in US history!
    And here you geeks are congregating on a message board making jokes about gay lifestyle products!
    Get some priorities!