Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Court Addresses Legality of Shrinkwrap Licenses

Posted by michael on from the pays-your-money-and-takes-your-chances dept.

NullProg writes "This article here comments on a legal case where a shrink-wrap license may be binding. This a scary precedent for any developer who has added a feature to their software already present in a competitors version."

1 of 282 comments (clear)

  1. And? by Clue4All · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'm still confused on why people think EULAs shouldn't be legally binding. It's a contract and you agreed to it, plain and simple. How is it the manufacturer's fault that you were too lazy to READ the damn thing?

    --

    Is your browser retarded?