Slashdot Mirror


HOWTO: Spend A Billion Dollars

shine-shine writes: "Forbes is running an article helping you figure out how to spend that spare billion you got laying around (don't you just hate when that happens?). Apparently, a geek would buy 500 black-market clones of himself, while the narcissist would most likely build "a monument similar in size and scale to Mount Rushmore, featuring his own face.""

4 of 508 comments (clear)

  1. Re:whores by 1nhuman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you have 1 billon$ you don't need whores. You will attract b*tches like hotmail attracts spam.

    --
    The glass is half-full. With poison. And there are cracks in the glass. The dirty, dirty glass.
  2. You hardly need that much by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to opensecrets.org, they don't go for more than $7 million each. You could buy a few key states' worth and not have to worry.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  3. Re:Bill's donation schedule by cscx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All those hundreds of millions pouring into the vaccination industry is getting a bit frightening, even if some of those are dupes. You don't eradicate most diseases by swamping them in vaccine, you eradicate them by improving people's living conditions. By and large, Bill isn't doing that.

    Here's some food for thought: Have you caught any fucking POLIO lately? How bout some smallpox? Do you have any idea how many babies die each year because they weren't properly vaccinated? Living conditions is one thing, but to discredit vaccines is ludicrous.

    Specifically, to equip them with Windows?

    Not like he's putting Linux on them or anything. Jesus, he's trying to help out underdeveloped areas in our own fucking country, and all you can do is be skeptical, like it's all part of his evil plan for world domination. Would you rather have those libraries have no computers and still be checking out books from the sixties? Umm, don't think so.

  4. Re:Asimov's first law by sql*kitten · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would take an obscene amount of money to feed everyone that is starving in the world, provide the infrastructure necessary to send the food everywhere it needs to go, and insure that they will be able to provide for themselves in the future

    Actually, that all exists already. There is already way too much food in the world - the US and EU destroy millions of tonnes of it every year. After all, food surpluses are a precondition of population growth, not the other way round, and the population is growing.

    Growing the food is easy - our civilization understood farming centuries ago. Distributing the food is easy - logistics is a well-developed science, practiced by Walmat, UPS and the Marines, you can even do a degree in it. The difficult part is purely in the realm of the political. So long as tyrants like Robert Mugabe use starvation as a tool of population control, or nations like Somalia keep feudal civil wars going, famines are inevitable.

    These are the men with just enough "obscene amount of money", but have failed to act.

    The Gates Foundation has given billions away. Literally. What have you done?

    3,000,000 counts of manslaughter per year.

    If you really believed that, you wouldn't have a computer to post to /. from, or indeed any other posessions. You would have given every cent to charity and right now be working for free on a subsistence farm in the third world. But you'd rather sit on the sidelines and run your mouth about things that are far beyond your understanding.