Slashdot Mirror


Laptop Travel Damage - Who's at Fault?

Denagoth asks: "Due to increased security measures, airport personnel are now directly handling everyone's laptop, PDA, and other electronic gizmos. Who is at fault when (not if - but I've been lucky) an airport employee drops, damages, (or even worse) loses one of these devices? Has anyone had any experience in this area and are there any legal precedents to fall back on?"

10 of 100 comments (clear)

  1. talk to a laywer by Naikrovek · · Score: 5, Funny

    don't ask legal questions of people who get in fights over brower preference.

  2. Probably them by gmhowell · · Score: 3, Informative

    They are probably liable. If you put the machine into their hands, there is essentially a bailment. They agree to take reasonable care and not damage your stuff.

    Now, there are probably all sorts of signs and regulations that disavow their responsibility. This is bullshit. Chances are that even a complete laptop replacement will fall under the statute of limitations on small claims where you are. A suit filed there, against the company, the airline, the employee (all at the same time. Important) should be taken care of quickly. If it even gets that far.

    If something happens, I suggest asking to speak to a manager, and asking what kind of 'incident report form' they have to fill out.

    You are, of course, having your computer shit hand checked, not run through the x-ray, right? If you put stuff on the x-ray belt, you're going to be liable, most likely. Yet another reason to request a hand check in the unlikely chance you don't get one.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  3. Re:Receipt by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Average Joe: Hello, I'd like you to sign this receipt before I let you touch my laptop.

    Security Guy #1: Sir, hand me the laptop. You're causing a scene.

    Average Joe: No I'm not. I just want to ensure that my laptop is handled safely.

    Security Guy #1: Don't contradict me. I'm in charge here, and you're causing a scene.

    Average Joe: I really wasn't trying to contradi--

    Security Guy #1: All right, we've got a live one here. Bob, come over and help me out.

    Bob removes his security wand out from under the skirt of a nine-year-old girl. The girl's mother is against the wall being "patted down" by a couple of other guards.

    Security Guy #2 (Bob): What seems to be the problem?

    Security Guy #1: We've got a non-cooperative.

    Security Guy #2: Close the concourse. [Then speaking to our Average Joe, who tried to make a break for it, but has since been been detained by a couple of men in dark sunglasses.] Looks like we've found ourselves an enemy combatant.

    Meanwhile a pair of dark complexioned men in turbans walk past the ruckus. Average Joe hears the one whisper to the other: "Hey Mohammad, do you think we're winning?"

  4. US Constitution by mcelrath · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Dammit, I want my 4th Ammendment rights back:
    Amendment IV

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    The argument "we must search you because you might have a bomb/gun/dildo" is a valid statement for any person, anywhere, any time, under any circumstances. It was also true at the time the constitution was written. Nonetheless, we have the 4th Ammendment.

    Perhaps the solution is not in searching every person, everwhere, all the time, under all circumstances, but to address why we have created an entire subcontinent that wants us dead.

    -- Bob

    --
    1^2=1; (-1)^2=1; 1^2=(-1)^2; 1=-1; 1=0.
    1. Re:US Constitution by mcelrath · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If the searches were being done by a private company, your statements would be correct.

      However, the searches are done by federal employees working for a federal agency, under mandate by the federal government. In my view, this directly violates the 4th ammendment, which does not allow the government to do this.

      To turn your argument around, YOU make the choice to leave the house every day. Before you leave the house you must inform your local sherrif so he can come over, pat you down, and ensure that you won't be walking the streets carrying a firearm. Would you consider that a volation of your rights? After all, you don't have to leave the house.

      Today to have access to most (all?) federal buildings you must also submit to a search, again by the government, without warrant, in violation of the 4th ammendment.

      Read the ammendment again. It says nothing about your choice to do diddly squat. The government simply is not granted the power to search you at its whim. The only arguing point about it is the definition of "unreasonable".

      -- Bob

      --
      1^2=1; (-1)^2=1; 1^2=(-1)^2; 1=-1; 1=0.
  5. Homeowner's Insurance by Verence · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just called our insurance agent today regarding this - schedule laptops with a minimal deductible. The rate for us was about $.75 / $100 value / year, covering loss, theft, or basically anything else that removes my ability to make use of it. This is by adding it to my folk's current homeowner's insurance plan.

    You'll need the standard stuff - receipts, serial numbers, and all that jazz.

    I'm flying tomorrow (today), and I am truly not looking forward to going through security with both my powerbook and two hard drives as well.

    --

    ... that's all i wrote...
  6. Why worry about it? by zulux · · Score: 3, Funny

    The chances of anthing dreadfull happening to your toys due to employee bungeling is so remote as to be laughable. Especially considering the very real possiblinty of having your expensive toys stolen by a somebody who isen't an emoloyee. Worry about that.

    Now to protect yourself from theft: Disguise. Buy a shitty looking backpack and use it to store your electronic goodies. Inside my backpack is a digital camera, Iridium phone, cell phone, laptop, noise canceling head-phones, Psion, MP3 player and possibly a GameBoy. A fine catch for any theif - and yet I draw hardly a glance. The stupid executive type with his six year old trackball Toshiba in a old "leatherette" Compaq case is just begging for a stealin'.

    If you're really paranoid - grab a Thinkpad with a quick-removable hard-drive and carry the drive in your pocket. Data is far more valuable the money. My output during my travels is small enough to fit on a 128MB SmartMedia card that slips into my wallet.

    Oh, bring a pack of cards. You woulden't want to smash your laptop during turbulance by playing solitare on it and letting if fall to the ground when then plane jumps up 3 feet and you forgot to buckle your seatbelt.

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  7. This happened to my electric razer by Eivind · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The short answer is: the company who destroys it is responsible, but they don't like to admit it.

    When I was travelling to Darmstadt rigth after 9/11, my hand luggage was searched. Inside was, among other things, an electric razer. Brute security-guard looks at it, tries opening it, but ends up instead breaking it apart. I'm told to report the damage to their "arrival office" upon arrival.

    Office says it must have been badly packed. I inform them that I *saw* the guy literally breaking it apart and that the packaging doesn't really play a part. They then claim electronic devices are not covered. There's nothhing "electronic" about it I say, sure it uses electricity but there's a difference between electric and electronic. And in any case, what *should* I bring for shaving, you don't particularily like razer-blades now do you ? And are you telling me I can stand and watch one of your employees break my things apart, and then you will claim that I have to cover the loss myself ?

    In the end they paid for it, but not without making a lof of unneeded fuzz about it.

  8. Re:Legal advice from slashdot? by drudd · · Score: 3, Funny

    If someone else broke it, yeah!

    Doug

    --
    Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
  9. Nobody! by BitGeek · · Score: 3, Interesting


    That's the great thing about the federal government-- they have ultimate authority with no responsibility.

    So, not only do we get LESS security in airports now that they are bringing in their DMV level idiots to handle everyone's stuff, but we have no recourse when they drop your laptop.

    I've had mine dropped by a dipthong in Tulsa Oklahoma. I got upset and he got irate at me that I could be upset that he dropped my laptop! I almost decked him. If he'd said, "I'm sorry! It slipped, is it ok?" I would have not cared, but instead he was telling me to hurry up as I bent down to pick up my laptop.

    Anyway, I would go after the airport. If you have damage go to the manager of the airport and take it up with them . Airports, despite being oppressed by the feds, are generally a business, even if they too are a local municipalities business. So, their guy is likely to be at least a bit concerned about market forces and try to make it right.

    This is only going to get worse. After all, it was the federal government that was responsible for the poor security that lead to 9/11, and their response has been to totally take over airport security (Rather than just meddling to make it useless). The correct response would be to let each airline be responsible for its OWN security-- nobody has an interest in keeping their multimillion dollar planes intact while still providing customer service like an airline. Furthermore, with them responsible for security on their flights if something DID happen they would be facing a lawsuit-- and so they have motivation to provide good security.

    With the federal government, their only motivation is power and re-electability. so if they can make noise like they are doing something bout it, and the country is mollified and at the same time get more power over us (hoe long until these weapons searches become drug searches as well?) then they are happy. And so many of you are bedwetting liberals and christian conservatives that you love the government and want it to take over your lives completely... so we have the feds--responsible for the initial failure on 9/11-- taking over the area that could prevent it. And nobody is holding them accountable.

    As long as you don't hold your government accountable, you get what you deserve.

    The horror stories are regular-- there's the guy who had his yacht seized by the coast guard because one of their dogs barked *once* during a boarding. They seized the yacht, tore it apart, couldn't find anything. So they decided that the fiberglass hull must be made out of cocaine (which is inane- the process would be more expensive than the value of the cocaine.) And thus they drilled 80,000 holes in the hull looking for cocaine. They didn't find anything. They boat was ruined, the guy sued, he appealed all the way to the supreme court and the supreme court ruled that he didn't have a case.

    Cause you can't sue the federal government.

    You call this a democracy? Stop voting for Democrats and Republicans. Stop putting up with this incompetence and poor management. And to think- you're paying %50 of your income in total taxes* for the privilege!

    If you aren't outraged, you aren't paying attention.

    * Some bedwetting liberal always complains about this number pointing out that the highest tax bracket is "only" (yeah, they'd love it to be more) %35. Well, lets assume you're paying some average of %25 in federal taxes. On top of that you have %16 social security (your half and your employers half-- you don't think he doesn't make *you* earn his half of that cost do you?) another %14 for medicaide, another %8 for all the money you spend in local sales taxes (assuming %8 local sales tax, that you spend most of your money locally and pay taxes, and that you only invest a small amount of your money at the long term, netting a tax of %10 on that, rather than %25 for short term investing).... that leaves %63 of your income going to taxes. And I've not even counted car tab fees, property taxes, state or local income taxes!, GASOLINE taxes which are almost %50, etc. etc. So, saying %50 of your money goes to taxes is being generous.

    --
    Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257