Cern Mass Produces Anti-Hydrogen

Izeickl writes "The BBC is reporting Here about scientists in the Cern particle accelerator in Geneva, Switzerland have mass produced over 50,000 atoms allowing them to test basic Physics using them, however "Harvard physicist Gerald Gabrielse said: "Our long experience with these very difficult experiments warns that antihydrogen may not have really been produced.""

Comments

Re:I found the perfect way...

[Redoc66]

"You'd never need oil again, or anything at all except a antiproton factory." ....except billions of times the outputted energy to make them in the first place. While it may have implications for portable fuel, it seems a little hard to believe we will be having anti-fuel for a while.

Re:Actually one of the first experiments...

[dfgdfgdfg]

Would be to check if it falls down.

It would fall down because it has the same mass as matter. Antimatter does not have negative mass. Instead, each particle has opposite charge. One antihydrogen atom is composed of an antiproton (negative charge, same mass as the proton), and a positron (positive charge, same mass as the electron).

On checking in which directory it falls, I think gravity is negligible compared to other forces at the particle level.

Re:waste of power

[be-fan]

1) First, this is a drop in the bucket. CERN is one of only a few entities using this kind of power. Take a look at the 55,000 home figure. Say these are your Asian homes, and you end up with 550,000 homes that could be powered by the energy used at CERN. Given the masses of humanity, that adds up to NOTHING. Certainly not enough to justify the potentially disastrous consequences to humanity that could result if we stop this kind of research. The average utility bill at Fermilab (US counterpart to CERN) is 1.5 million dollars. Over the course of a year, thats $18 million. In comparison, the USAID annual budget is $6 billion. The Federal Highway program's budget on the other hand, is $26 billion. Yes, people would rather fix potholes than develop countries. Such is the world we live in. But its not like research money is coming out of the mouths of the poor. The real problem isn't that the world spends too much on research (if only). The real problem is that people have no clue about anything outside the bounds of their tiny meaningless existance. For example, most people, when survayed, said that they thought the US spends too much on foreign aid. When asked how much they thought was appropriate, they said 5% of the budget. The real figure is one-tenth of that number. There are dozens of things you can do to make up the cost of this research, including improving distribution methods, bringing down cultural barries that make access to healthcare inefficient, reforming patent conventions that jack up the cost of medications, etc. In the end, science is not the thing to sacrifice for humanity. BTW, I grew up learning stuff about international development from my dad (that's his line of work), and I was born in Thailand and spent part of my childhood in Bangladesh. I *do* know what I'm talking about.

2) We're not talking about the "many marvelous inventions in the last, say, 20 years." We're talking about how physics has redefined the universe was we know it over the last 200 years. A large percentage of the modern economy owes its existance to quantum physics. The work at CERN is simply an extension of the very ancient search for knowledge about the structure of matter. Anytime you get a cat-scan or an X-ray, take medicine, use a computer, drive a car, watch TV, etc, you're directly benifeting from that research. Even those in inpovrished countries should thank this research for allowing scientists to use advanced imaging tehnologies to create things like TB vaccines that sells for dollars per dose. Going into the future, the only sure way to relieve poverty is to find more resources. It is not possible for the human population to keep growing, expanding, evolving, reaching towards a higher state of being, without more raw matter. So yes, that warp drive space ship WILL help the guy living in poverty, if you stop being so short-sighted. Giving a man a fish is not the only way to help him.