Vorpal Rabbit-o-Saurus

guacamolefoo writes "CNN reports that a rabbit-o-saurus fossil was discovered in China. Apparently it lived about 128 million years ago and was related to the T-rex. It had feathers and large, buck teeth. Paleontologists are finding more and more bizarre things. Some seem so strange that they must appear to some to be made up. When the science skeptics get ahold of the rabbit-o-saurus, they'll put it right next to their moon landing hoax books and their creationism propaganda."

Comments

Re:Why the jab at Creationism?

[ceejayoz]

Discovery of a species of rabbit? You apparently didn't read the article.

The newly discovered fossil is a dinosaur with large front incisors. People noted that the two teeth look vaguely like a rabbit's incisors, thus the misnomer of "rabbit-o-saurus". The whole animal, though, looks more like a standard dinosaur - birdlike.

Aristotle and Newton are still correct - unless I missed the Slashdot articles on the revocation of the principles of displacement and gravity. The Bible, on the other hand, hardly survives from its original form - it's been translated and modified so many times.

I haven't seen any new discovery that pokes holes in theories whilst supporting creationists - can you post a single example of this? (p.s. sites such as "www.godisgreat.com" don't count as sources)

His vorpal blade went snicker-snack

[arsheive]

This thing looks a lot like a jabberwock