WorldCom Forced To Block Questionable Sites
Cutriss writes "Seen on Wired, this article briefly mentions how the Pennsylvania State Government is forcing UUNet to block access to five child pornography sites, under their new state law. No mention was made as to whether they were domestic or foreign. I'm certainly no fan of kiddie porn, but this ruling also serves as a blow to the 'common carrier' status that any whatever-tiered ISP should have in theory, and in practice. Also, this is a state law, not a federal one, but the end result is nationwide. This isn't a whole lot different from Yahoo! France being sued for making auctions of Nazi propaganda viewable by French citizens."
I'm worried you haven't... well, you know... since then.
Do you need some advice on supplemental fiber?
It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries
Do you know that the age of consent is different in other countries? I'm pretty sure the age at which you can act in a porn movie is different as well. I don't know about you, but I don't want to live in a country that censors everything from the outside world that doesn't match their views, such as China, or pretty soon the US, it seems.
I saw a movie. It had bad Nazis. Kill Kill Kill Them All.
Seastead this.
You are correct. ISPs are not common carriers. There is specific law about who is and is not a common carrier. ISPs are "information service" providers. Under the Telecommunications Act, common carriers are subject to Title II regulation, while ISPs are unregulated though to some extent technically subject to Title I.
Some laws do specify what an ISP can and cannot do, or must do when told. It's not quite the same as common carrier rules, but has a lot in common.