Passport vs. Plan 9
netphilter writes "LinuxWorld is carrying an article about how Apache and Plan 9 are going to defeat Microsoft's Passport. I hate Passport's integration with XP (although that might be because I hate XP). An Open Source single-sign on would be a real blessing. Will we ever get a good single sign-on solution?"
no its not you are at least the fourth one. Fool
Having 3 plans instead of one defeats the whole purpose of SINGLE sign on.
What we should have, as with any other Internet succesfull strategy is a single standard and competing implementations. That way we are insured to have compatibility and the added benefit of market competition.
Can we mod the article -1, Presumputous?
/. story, right?
Well, I think the real reason it was posted was:
I hate Passport's integration with XP (although that might be because I hate XP). An Open Source single-sign on would be a real blessing.
Anything anti-MS is a good
An open source single sign-on won't solve the problem of a single sign-on.
The reason people hate passport isn't because its written by MS. Why don't people understand that?
Simple: Blind rage of MS.
Tunnel Vision can happen at both ends of the tunnel.
Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
Some of us log in to more than one website, and have trouble keeping track of unique passwords on each. You stupid fuckhead!