Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Lessig On Bounties For Spamhunters

Posted by timothy on from the pay-pal dept.

An anonymous reader submits: "Digital rights (as in yours, not the RIAA's) guru Lawrence Lessig comes up with a Swiftian idea of how to fight spammers -- $10,000 for the first ubergeek to hunt the offender down. The column is at CIO Insight. Wonder if it'll reach its audience there."

2 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. Re:How much... by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Informative
    > How much would I get if I blew up the building that housed hotmail.com?

    Nothing. The spam doesn't come from Hotmail. Spammers forge hotmail.com dropboxes into the headers, but typically spam through dedicated machines hosted by spam-friendly providers.

    If someone were to go apeshit with a SuperSoaker full of saline solution in ELI.NET's or Level3's datacenter, for instance, your load of inbound spam would probably decrease substantially.

    There are some "ISPs" allegedly in Mexico and Brazil (but hosted via US-based backbones) that are no more than spammer fronts.

  2. Re:What an asshole by hysterion · · Score: 4, Informative
    Once added to the list, there is no way to appeal the blocking or to fight such policies

    This is bullshit, and he knows it, but he has to exaggerate and distort the truth in order to highlight his fashionable Bounty idea. I inadvertedly ran an open relay and quickly ended up on Ordb [ordb.org],

    This is out-of-context, selective quoting, and you know it, since right after this he continues with: ``Sometimes, the spam vigilantes offer people a way to appeal, but not always. Spews.org, for example, blocks without any appeal allowed.'' So,
    • He does nuance his assertions. You `exaggerate and distort' them.
    • He's talking about Spews.org, not Ordb.org.
    --
    Timeo idiotikOS et dona ferentes