Slashdot Mirror


Top Ten Physics Experiments Of All Times

MarkedMan writes "The New York Times is running an article about the top ten physics experiments of all time. You may disagree with the order, but it is hard to imagine pulling any one of these from the top ten. And most of them could be done by a patient amateur, at least one with access to cannonballs." The Times article wraps up the work by Robert P. Crease mentioned a few weeks ago.

6 of 264 comments (clear)

  1. NYT article without registering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    For all the lamers who don't want to register, Google News is your friend.

  2. Thought experiments vs experiments by Jim.McGinness · · Score: 5, Informative

    What I find interesting is that two of the experiments were not experiments at all in the traditional sense. They were thought experiments: Galileo is generally thought not to have dropped cannonballs from the Leaning Tower of Pisa -- instead, his writings describe a thought experiment involving two unequal weights tied together with a rope. And Young's double slit experiment was also a thought experiment -- the verification came many years later.

  3. Re:Summary of the article by Sivar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Article summary: Three out of ten great scientists rose to prominence by proving Aristotle was an idiot.

    Proving that *Aristotle* was an idiot? Aristotle is widely known as a person who was probably among the most intelligent humans ever to have lived.

    Aristotle taught Alexander the Great. His studies on animals laid the foundation for the biological sciences and weren't superceded until two THOUSAND years after his death.

    Aristotle made significant contributions to logic (He and Plato founded the basic principals of logic, such as some of the rules of inference), physics, astronomy, meteorology, zoology, metaphysics, theology, psychology, political science, economics, ethics, rhetoric, and poetics However, still more astounding is the fact that the majority of these subjects did not exist as such before him, so that he would have been the first to conceive of and establish them, as systematic disciplines.

    His writings, some of which you should recognize as some of the most influential documents ever written, include:
    On logic
    Categories
    On Interpretation
    Prior Analytics
    Posterior Analytics
    Topics
    Sophistical Refutations

    On physics
    Physics
    On The Heavens
    On Generation and Corruption

    On psychology and natural history
    On The Soul
    On The Parts Of Animals
    On The Motion Of Animals
    On The History Of Animals
    On The Gait Of Animals
    On The Generation Of Animals

    On ethics
    Nicomachean Ethics
    Eudemian Ethics
    Magna Moralia
    Politics
    Rhetoric
    Poetics

    General investigation of the things
    Metaphysics

    Other works
    Meteorology
    On Dreams
    On Longevity and Shortness Of Life
    On Memory and Reminiscence
    On Prophesying by Dreams
    On Sense and The Sensible
    On Sleep and Sleeplessness
    On Youth and Old Age, On Life And Death, On Breathing

    This person contributed more and to more areas than any other who has ever lived. That some of his sciences were found to be incorrect does not change this, particularly when you consider that he laid the foundation of the principal ideas of what we call physics more than two thousand years before his physics were superceded. Calling this man a moron is like calling Linux Torvalds a newbie programmer, or Windows 95 a reliable server operating system. In fact, I cannot think of anything more wrong than to use "Aristotle" and "idiot" in the same sentence without a "not". Name one person who has done even close to as much for human knowledge and understanding.

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  4. Groan. At least TWO ERRORS in the article. by Alsee · · Score: 5, Informative

    gravity, which holds that the strength of attraction between two objects increases with the square of their masses and decreases with the square of the distance between them.

    No, attraction between two objects increases with the PRODUCT of their masses.

    Millikan:
    each droplet picked up a slight charge of static electricity as it traveled through the air

    No, he used radiation to alter the charge on the drops. I believe he used an alpha particle source.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  5. Re:Reductionist history by KarlH · · Score: 5, Informative
    Albert Einstein didn't get the Nobel Prize for his work on relativity. By 1921 that was still in dispute, not established science. He got it for discovering the law of the photoelectric effect -- and to some lesser extent for his model describing the kinetics of Brownian motion.

    www.nobel.se/physics/laureates/1921/index.html
    www.nobel.se/physics/laureates/1921/press.html

  6. Re:What about the Michaelson-Morley experiment? by RedWizzard · · Score: 5, Informative
    JJ Thompsons backscattering of alpha particles from gold foil - changed to model of the atom from the plum pudding model to the nuclear model
    You're confused. The plum pudding atom was JJ Thompson's - it was Ernest Rutherford who did the scattering experiment and proposed the nuclear model of the atom. And that experiment is on the list at number 9.