Slashdot Mirror


FSF Issues GNU/Linux Name FAQ

jdavidb writes "The FSF has issued a FAQ about why they believe you should say "GNU/Linux." Surprisingly long." They're certainly... thorough.

13 of 961 comments (clear)

  1. Ummmm.... by DJPenguin · · Score: 3, Funny

    *smiling, backing away very slowly from stallman...*

    Ahem.

    1. Re:Ummmm.... by Milalwi · · Score: 4, Funny

      *smiling, backing away very slowly from stallman...*

      Don't make eye contact! :-)

      Milalwi
  2. misnomer by Telastyn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somehow I doubt those are frequently asked questions...

    1. Re:misnomer by rde · · Score: 5, Funny

      If the list truly was a faq, top of the list, to my mind (well, okay, second to 'what the hell are you thinking') would be 'how do you pronounce gnu/linux?'

      If memory serves, RMS pronounced it guh-new-slash-linux; if I remember correctly, there's yet another compelling reason to pronounce it with a silent gnu.

    2. Re:misnomer by glwtta · · Score: 5, Funny

      and yet they are frequently answered.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    3. Re:misnomer by foobar104 · · Score: 3, Funny

      pronounce it with a silent gnu

      Man, I'd give anything to live in a world where the GNU was silent.

    4. Re:misnomer by pmancini · · Score: 4, Funny

      Stallman sits in a basement, arguing with himself. He then writes the argument out (bad grammer and all - maybe he should have used a Microsoft product with helpful features like spell check and grammer check.) Finally, the dopes^H^H^H^H^Hfine people at Slashdot decide to give the fool an even bigger audience. *sigh*

      What is a bigger waste of the Internet? Stallman's rants or those Bumfight tapes?

  3. Take a page from Mozilla... by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remember, the correct pronunciation of Netcape is "Mozilla". Why can't the correct pronunciation of GNU/Linux be "Linux"? Oh, I forgot... the GNU is never silent. :)

    (Tongue firmly in cheek)

  4. Re:Change the gpl.. by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 4, Funny

    They want to enforce the GNU/Linux issue, but hate BSD's advertising clause. This is not a troll: how do they say you can do one but not the other?

  5. Re:Are they? by glwtta · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's actually GNU/Linux not GNU\Linux, give the forward slash some credit for its work!

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  6. In related news.... by yack0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    vi users have put together a FAQ entitled "Why emacs sucks"

    The National Apple Institute released a bulletin on use of pears in food products "Fuck pears!"*

    The Paintball Users Consortium released it's findings on "Why pump guns are better"

    The folks at "Apple Computers Rule!" released a document on "Why Macs are better than PC's"

    Gee, did I miss any completely blatant flame war topics?

    Useless news, stuff that fills the boards up...

    *sigh*

    j

    * credit for this to George Carlin, Place for my Stuff album.

    --
    -- There is no sig line, only Zuul.
  7. Re:Why are they so desperate ? by eam · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't help thinking that this is a list of Frequently Asked Questions that just aren't frequently asked.

  8. Re:Why are they so desperate ? by rvaniwaa · · Score: 3, Funny


    It would be hard to write an emacs Macro that inserted "GNU" everytime one typed "Linux"

    I can see it now, the Emacs office assistant: "I see you are trying to type 'Linux' Wouldn't you prefer the official name 'GNU/Linux'?

    --
    main(i){(10-putchar(((25208>>3*(i+=3))&7)+(i ?i-4?100:65:10)))?main(i-4):i;}