Slashdot Mirror


Intel Demos 4.7-GHz Pentium

richmlpdx writes "Silicon Strategies has an article about Intel's latest demo... "Providing a sneak preview of its future developments, Intel Corp. here today demonstrated its fastest microprocessors to date--a 4.7-GHz chip for high-end desktop PCs.""

25 of 364 comments (clear)

  1. The Weather Channel by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, a small heat wave hit San Jose a few days ago. Amazingly, the source of this heat seemed to be centered at Intel's R&D headquarters.

  2. Hammer & Intel by Drunken+Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From what I've read, even with the .13 die on the Athlon XP, they won't be able to clock it much above 2.5 GHz. And supposedly AMD is hoping to have sales of 60% Hammer, 40% Athlon XP by Q3-03, so does that mean they're going to take a whopping in the high end market or do they have a .09 Athlon XP up their sleeves?

    --
    Have you been stalked by Seth today?
    1. Re:Hammer & Intel by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hmm.. Well, AMD's Barton core that's supposed to be released in October or so still use a .13 micron die (mostly "just" 512Kb L2 cache and 333Mhz FSB). And I thought that was the core they were going to live on until the Hammer processors. :-/

      Sure, they *could* manage to start manufacturing the Truly Final Non-Hammer Core sometime in mid-2003, but by then the Hammers should be out (?) and I'd definitely go for and AMD Athlon (Clawhammer) 3400+ in Q1 2003. Mwhaha :)

      But they might plan on having .09 micron Athlon XP's and Clawhammer models overlapping each other throughout 2003, although it *seems* unlikely since the Clawhammer (at least the initial models) also use a .13 micron die. Much like if the tech isn't quite there yet for affordable prices.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  3. burp! (excuse me) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow! Now my Palladium/LaGrande machine will be able to notify the FBI 8 times faster!

  4. And in the other news... by jd678 · · Score: 5, Funny

    A group of extreme hackers based in a northern section of Finland have shown this processor able to run at 5907Mhz using a never before tried method of liquid helium cooling. "We're a bit dissapointed really, I mean, this is a new record and all, but we still don't think our DVD's are going to rip fast enough till we get up to 6Ghz"

  5. Re: 4.7 is 1337 d00dz by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    > but what type of application requires that much horse power?

    Locomotives. You use the heat to drive the steam engine.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  6. Slightly misrepresented....I think by Soulslayer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've seen this reported on other sites, and if I recall this is not a demo of production silicon at 4.7Ghz, but rather this is Intel overclocking their own hardware till it crashed to show that with some improvements the chip design is capable of these speeds, if not in consumer quantities at present.

    Anand Tech has more information from their IDF report.

    --


    Once more unto the breach dear friends...
  7. GHz Hunting by e8johan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How long will this hunt for more GHz continue? I'd say that if the major industry companies (Intel, AMD...) would make a since long needed move to a better architecture we could achieve more performance with less means.

    What do I have against high frequencies? For starters, high speed, fully syncronized digital constructions rely on switching millions of transistors at the same time (each clock cycle), this burns lots of power which is a limiting factor today.
    Also, high frequency does not imply high performance, the CPU still needs to do something each stage, for example older Pentiums (P3, if I remember right) had a 20 (yes twenty) stage pipeline. This yeilds huge penalties for miss predictions for branches etc.
    This GHz hunting also leads to other problems, such as huge electromagnetic disturbances in the chip, and in busses, etc. The solution to this is to add more wires and pull them in different directions to compensate. This only wastes more power and emits even more heat.

    What I suggest, now when we have lots of transistors to play with, are asyncronous designs! Yes they are harder to design and verify, but that is largely because the lack of supporting tools.
    This would reduce the power needs, let the designers make longer critical paths in their constructions (just clock that part slower), and reduce the need for registers used to balance pipe-lines etc.

    Another move could be to introduce simpler, but parallell CPUs, perhaps on the same piece of silicon. The software systems of today are multi-threaded already, so why not make the hardware capable of _true_ multi tasking...

    1. Re:GHz Hunting by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think the P3 pipeline had 10 stages, while the P4 had 20. So the problem with branch predictions are the Pentium 4's problem. ;-)

      But what about the P4's Hyper Pipeline tech that allow it to do 3 pipeline stages per clock cycle? The P4's Branch Prediction Unit (BPU) is also said to be improved by around 30% when compared to the one found in the P3. Perhaps these improvements even things out a bit while still making it easy to achieve high clock speeds?

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  8. It all makes sense now! by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 5, Funny

    This whole time we have been blaming our electricity problems here in California on deregulation, Davis' failure to secure contracts, etc.

    It's been those punks at Intel with this chip all along!!

  9. So we're 1000 times faster now by decarelbitter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My first pc was a 8088 at 4,77 MHz, somewhere in 1985. This new CPU does 4,7 GHz which is 4700 MHz, which is 1000 times as fast as what I've started with. Impressive. If back then someone would have told me that one day we would be using a 4700 MHz CPU I would probably burst out in laughter :)

    1. Re:So we're 1000 times faster now by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 5, Funny

      Impressive. If back then someone would have told me that one day we would be using a 4700 MHz CPU I would probably burst out in laughter

      Way back when, I would have believed that, since I knew Moores law.

      I would have burst out in laughter if you told me it would still take 10 minutes to boot my PC.

  10. Re:Opps!.... by kryonD · · Score: 3, Informative

    The answer is yes and no. For any application that is doing massive ammounts of number manipulation on a small and colocated set of data (i.e. cachable) you will see performance at approx 4.7x10^9 operations per second. This is for the most part completely unrealistic since today's data applications usually operate on large quantities of data that are spread out through memory. For the average case, the computer will operate at somewhere over the speed of the Front Side Bus (FSB) which is still running close to the same speed it has been running at for the past 4 years. You will indeed notice a speed increase due to any computations that do not require the use of the FSB, but it will probably only be around 50% faster as opposed to 400% faster. The intuitive reader will note that the jump from a 100MHz to 400MHz processor was also limitted by the FSB and thus did not acheive a 400% increase in speed.

    --
    I've dirtied my hands writing poetry, for the sake of seduction; that is, for the sake of a useful cause. --Dostoevsky
  11. I want to see 4.77 by weave · · Score: 5, Funny
    I hope whenever the chip gets there, IBM will sell something like an anniversary IBM PC with same case design as original, rated at 4.77 GHz, 640 megs of RAM, and your choice of three different operating systems -- just like the original!. (er, ok, two out of three ain't bad...)

    I'd hit it.

    1. Re:I want to see 4.77 by weave · · Score: 5, Informative
      Well, for those who didn't get the three operating system line, the original IBM PC came with your choice of three different OSes, MS/DOS 1.0, CPM/86, or something called p-System, some pascal based OS.

      So, when I said two out of three ain't bad, I meant there is no way in hell an anniversary PC would give you a choice of OSes. Microsoft just wouldn't permit it.

      p.s. No, it's not that funny. I have no idea why it's easier to get slightly humorous posts modded up to a 5 but posts with serious thought and hopeful insight in them never get modded up or often get modded down by someone who just doesn't agree with you.

      Whatever, not like it all matters anyway...

  12. Re:No...it's much faster than 1000x as fast by khuber · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I really doubt your "many orders of magnitude" claim. You are overblowing the benefit of SIMD extensions. The larger difference would be in caching, pipelining, instruction reordering, etc.

    For the most part, for most apps, SIMD is irrelevant. Yeah, maybe you can use it for data copying or a few other general things, but for the most part SIMD only helps with specific types of data processing until SIMD is further developed and SIMD-savvy compilers are common.

    I do think MIPS can be compared due to the similarity in instruction sets.

    The 8088 ran at about .3 MIPS (howstuffworks.com) and Sandra benchmarks a P4 1.6 at 3004 MIPS (theregister.com), so estimate ~8700 MIPS for a 4.7 GHz P4. That's a little crude obviously.

    => 8700/.3 = 29000 times more MIPS, which is only 1 order of magnitude higher than the straight MHz difference. If SIMD had an order of magnitude effect (which it doesn't), that would be 2 orders of magnitude difference.

    -Kevin

  13. And while everybody is spending money by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    on x.x Ghz processors that they actually still don't need... my server runs beautifully with a pentium 166 and 64Mb of RAM, AND I still have money to feed the family.
    C'mon people... I'm not saying nobody needs this (it does say high-end), or that 166Mhz is enough for everybody (it certainly isn't for a desktop), but why aren't people still not smarting up? Why do they keep buying a completely new PC every 2 years while they don't need it to write their word-document? (and i'm not even asking why they buy such crap that a pc with only half of the specifications could perform equally well).

  14. Question. by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does rapid improvement in processor technology cancel out the need for developers to learn how to write better code on a particular platform in order to achieve the maximum possible benefit from Information Technology?

    Background:

    Remember the BBC Micro, the ZX Spectrum? When they first came out, games were slow and blocky. But then several years went by without any significant improvement in processor performance.

    Therefore, in order to produce better software and better games, developers had to learn how to write better code on their favourite platforms. They developed techniques and tricks to make every Hz count.

    Today, you can do impressive stuff with crap code, simply through virtue of the raw grunt of the processor.

    Hence the question. Do they cancel out? If Intel had not brought out a new processor in the last 5 years, where would software be in relation? Better, worse, or same?

  15. This is like a dragster race by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Achieve super high speeds for super short durations to impress the spectators.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  16. Please. by SlashChick · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seriously. Why do people buy luxury cars when a Honda could get them to work just as easily? Why do people buy large houses? Why do lots of people, for that matter, insist on leasing a new car every two years, even though they own nothing at the end of the lease?

    The answer is simple: People perceive it as being of some VALUE. People buy new PCs because they look better, or because Internet Explorer will take less time to load, or because right now it's just taking too damn long to print out that document, or the Internet is too slow. Yes, some of these reasons are misguided, and it's our job as those "in the know" to tell people when they do have a misguided assumption ("A Pentium 4 will make my Internet connction faster...") It's also our job to explain to them how best to spend their money if they ask us for advice -- perhaps their money would be better spent on a broadband connection or a memory upgrade or a better video card. Maybe they don't need a new computer.

    Whining about why people buy new computers is futile. People buy new things constantly. Don't forget that people buying and upgrading new computers is what keeps our industry afloat, as well. Not only does it make hardware prices go down, thus benefiting more of us, but we get the added benefit of easier tech support (for the most part, computers have dramatically improved in this area since Windows 95 first hit the shelves) and better software. (My personal favorite is finally dragging those last few holdouts off of Netscape 4.7 so I can make great-looking dynamic websites that actually work with their browser.)

    Next time, instead of wringing your hands and saying "Why?!", encourage those who are upgrading to spend their money in the wisest way possible. The more people who enjoy using their computers, the more successful the industry will be as a whole, and the more jobs we will all have as a result. ;)

  17. You know you're a nerd when... by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Funny
    You think of using anything above 3 ghz to cook your Thanksgiving turkey :)

    If they don't make it by thanksgiving, don't worry! Just use your Athlon.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  18. Comments on this story : Digest Edition by Duds · · Score: 5, Funny

    - First Post!

    New Thread
    - Someone complains that they should be changing the architechture not the speed.
    - Reply about how he just described the G4
    - Further reply that G4 is now behind
    - Sulky Apple - Intel speculation

    New Thread
    - AMD Roolz
    - Intel Roolz
    - Motorola Roolz
    - Crusoe Roolz
    - ARM roolz
    - No AMD roolz (repeat to fade)

    New Thread
    - Complaint that no-one needs that power
    - You said that last time and we did
    - I don't, I like my 486
    - Ever Rendered, played a game, video edited
    - Reasons for needing that much power
    - Offtopic bitch about CmdrTaco and reference to 640k being enough for everyone

    New Thread
    - Comment digest
    - complaints about comment digest

  19. coffe? by bogado · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why don't make it water cooled, then you just put a paper filter and some coffer, and tada... your computer makes coffe. If want hotter coffe, just overclock it a litte. :-)

    --
    []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

    ^[:wq

  20. missed one thread by prisoner · · Score: 5, Funny

    New Thread

    - U can make coffee with new proc
    - I can bake a Turkey with it
    - No, I can spit-cook a yak with it
    - offtopic rant about u damned meat eaters.

  21. 10 GHz air cooled ALU already in silicon by zerofoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anandtech recently went "backstage" at Intel and got pictures of a 10 GHz ALU running at Intel with air cooling. Pics here

    -ted