OSI Approves Two New Licenses
An anonymous reader writes "The Open Source Initiative approved two new licenses. One, the Academic Free License is a MIT/BSD-like license . The other one, the Open Software License is an apparently GPL-incompatible "viral" license with some obnoxious clauses. Both have an interesting "mutual termination for patent action" clause - basically, the license terminates if you file a lawsuit in any court against any software that is licensed under an OSI approved license containing the same clause."
Why more licenses?
The open source has enough licenses without throwing another into the mix, especially when they aren't even GPL-compatible.
All this does is confuse potential developers and users, making it harder for the mainsteam user to use Linux.
If you don't know what Zoo Blacklisting is, click here.