Slashdot Mirror


No More Mac Tweaking?

netphilter writes "Apple is trying to "close the operating system to tweakers" according to this story on Wired. The addition of the BSD kernel and the command line left me thinking that they were trying to open the OS a bit more to tweakers, not close it. I'm not a Mac user, but I have been thinking about trying out OS X. However, if Apple is trying to CLOSE the OS (contrary to the impression that I had) then I'm not going to waste my time." Jamie adds: life may be harder for them, I guess, but many developers are still tweaking Mac OS X.

18 of 660 comments (clear)

  1. Fucking Mac weenies by gazbo · · Score: -1, Troll

    With your fucking translucent fucking case motherfuckers.

  2. First Post? by toygeek · · Score: -1, Troll

    That sucks, OS X looked promising too. Just waiting for it to be ported to x86

    1. Re:First Post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      die die die die die you scumbag death to you burn in hell eat shit and die die die die die die die die die die I will kill you with my bare hands you piece of shit who must die die die die die die die

      In conclusion, the Mac OS will never be ported to x86.

  3. And Apple isn't a monopoly ? by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 0, Troll
    Seems that Apple has a 100% monopoly on the Macintosh operating system and is now operating as a monopoly, closing interfaces to 3rd party developers

    Where is the DOJ and state attorney generals ? I expect a lawsuit to be filed immediately giving me the source to the MAC user interface so I can make adjustments to my hearts desire.

    Oh wait, this is an anti-Mac article, not an anti-M$ article, guess my karma is headed down now

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    1. Re:And Apple isn't a monopoly ? by bsartist · · Score: 0, Troll

      Seems that Apple has a 100% monopoly on the Macintosh operating system

      Yeah, and Chevy has a monopoly on Corvettes. Go get out a dictionary, and look up what the word "monopoly" means. Go ahead, we'll wait.

      Every company has a monopoly on its own products. MS has a monopoly on computer operating systems - a whole class of products. Even that, in and of itself, would not have been illegal. MS went to court, not because they had a monopoly, but because they abused their monopolistic position in order to gain market share in other markets.

      Oh wait, this is an anti-Mac article, not an anti-M$ article, guess my karma is headed down now

      If your post gets modded down, it will be because it's idiotic bullshit, not because it's anti-Mac.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
  4. Jamis is a fag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Jamie adds: Dick may be harder for them, I guess, but many developers are still sucking their daddy's penis.

  5. Alternative Solution by redhotchil · · Score: -1, Troll

    Instead of installing a closed-source, proprietary OS like Mac OS X, you should, instead, install GNU/Linux. With GNU/Linux you can customize your Mac as much as you like. I have GNU/Linux installed on my Powerbook, and G4 at home and they both work better than Mac OS X!

    Check out http://pengiunppc.org for more details.

  6. Ugh. I'd rather... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    give my daughters to a few hundred Taliban pedophiles to use as fuck toys than use anything from the Not-so-great Satan aka Apple.

    Hopefully all Apple users will be tortured to death with rusty apple coring knives. :)

    Have a nice day.

  7. Is Wired owned by Microsoft or something...!? by agent+oranje · · Score: 0, Troll

    First, this is in reference to GUI tweaking, which I think is a fairly bad idea anyway. Many OS X apps have features based around the GUI, such as "dock-aware" applications and the likes, so if you go in and be a super-h4x0r to make your OS X box look like a Wind0z3 machine or something dumb like that, applications would probably get very, very pissed. OS X will always be tweakable as long as it has the BSD kernel. As this is the whole purpose of OS X, I don't see this fact changing any time soon.

    --
    -agent oranje.
  8. Re:Apple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    Dear Apple,

    I am a homosexual. I bought an Apple computer because of its well earned reputation for being "the" gay computer. Since I have become an Apple owner, I have been exposed to a whole new world of gay friends. It is really a pleasure to meet and compute with other homos such as myself. I plan on using my new Apple computer as a way to entice and recruit young schoolboys into the homosexual lifestyle; it would be so helpful if you could produce more software which would appeal to young boys. Thanks in advance.

    with much gayness,

    Father Randy "Pudge" O'Day, S.J.

  9. Then run X Windows. Oh wait you dont have a mac by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1, Troll

    Whoops. Why did you post again?

  10. *MOST* were by caduguid · · Score: 2, Troll

    Most Kaleidoscope interfaces were ugly as sin...

    but they weren't all. I remember some, you-could-almost-say-beautiful, kaleidoscope themes. When I lived in Japan there were clubs where people would design clever and attractive ones. Floral patterns, space patterns, favourite cartoon characters, whatever...

    It's hard thing to explain to someone whose idea of 'themes' comes from the microsoft default 'options', but the immediate and powerful impression you got when you saw a mac really decked-out with customizations like kaleidoscope was real. It was one of those things non-geeks could do that bullt a relationship with their machine. Sure, it sounds corny and belonging to the 'get-a-life' category, but it was one of those things that made people love their macs the way windows users rarely did.

    Furthermore, they (kaleidoscope ultra-themes) were the one feature of the Mac I have never seen even remotely equalled outside the mac world. (I don't discount that it may have been done in the multi-window-manager world of the unices, but i've personally never seen the equivalents, and as far as windows? forget about it.)

    Being able to customize their their interfaces, right down to the shapes and design of the scroll bars, the location of the close/windowshade buttons, the title bars... it let you feel your mac was truly yours. (And the smilely mac face gave a bit of personality, too.)

    I think apple's new policy sucks. IMHO.

  11. Re:Easy console access, plugins, hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Actually, they're far simpler than that.

    Step 1: Find out that there really are no upgrade parts available for your sorry little Mac. Bury your head in shame.
    Step 2: There is no Step 2. Didn't you read Step 1?

  12. waah waah waah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    "I'm not a mac user, but if they are moving to *CLOSE* (worse than RAPE) instead of *OPEN* (better than FREE WHORES) then I'mm'a take my ball and go *HOME* (where my mommy is)

  13. That's the final straw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Macs are gay, case closed.

  14. Re:Apples Target Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I have been called an artist. Whether I really am one is for history to decide.

    You are aware, aren't you, that this is the point at which every self-respecting person stopped reading? You are an arrogant fuck, and nobody likes you.

    Also, I'm fucking your mom up the ass right now. She says "hi."

  15. Mac - the time waster by this+is+crazy · · Score: 0, Troll

    My house mate bought one of those titanium macs. Its slow, its expensive, its not compatible, and all he does with it is reconfigure the "look and feel" of his desktop, or play with the usb "wheel knob" adjusting the volume of the mp3 player. Why bother? Why not just get windows. It works out of the box. It runs on _really fast_ hardware, and its cheap. And there is less messing around prior to getting work done. At any rate, as soon as Microsoft gets pissed off at Apple again . . . no more office => no more mac sales. Already the files produced by excel on the mac aren't quite compatible with excel 2000 on windows!

  16. The Answer Is Simple... by BlackBolt · · Score: 0, Troll
    Apple should put good theming capabilities into OSX themselves, to ensure it all works properly. The answer is not to reduce user functionality, but to make sure it is done right.

    BlackBolt