Declaring The Death of Metatags
theduck writes "Andrew Goodman of Traffick.com pleaded for someone to announce the end of metatags (at least with respect to trying to skeeve good search engine ranking). and Danny Sullivan, Editor of The SearchEngineReport obliged. Personally, I've resisted using them for years, but convincing clients that they're not worth the effort has always been difficult. Does anyone (except porn sites) actually use them anymore?"
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" Content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
But I guess that slashcode is not the w3c 's best friend
they're only talking about the KEYWORD one.
the description tag is still used to display a blurb about your site in many search engines.
and then there's the always-fun meta refresh tag.
... a reference to the awesome Meta Crap article which highlights very clearly the problems with relying on <META> tags for useful information.
The only thing I ever used meta tags for (at least since the advent of Google as the search engine of choice for the majority of Web users) was for redirects. But that only works if browsers support the redirect and if the user doesn't press stop or back, etc. Thus for redirecting users I use PHP's HTTP header redirect and equivalent in ASP.
/>
That said there is one meta tag that we all need:
<meta name="MSSmartTagsPreventParsing" content="true"
That's what the ALT attrbute is for: text that is parsed by robots and search engines in place of the image.