Slashdot Mirror


Sun to Sell Unbundled Solaris 9

An anonymous reader writes "Sun VP John Loiacono told eWEEK that the company is scrapping its plan to limit Solaris 9 support to Sun x86 hardware. Loiacono said the version for non-Sun hardware will retail for $99 for a single CPU and that the company is committed to supporting both Sun and non-Sun hardware in the future. Sun will also publicize the compatibility test suite it used internally, and said it may ultimately open the code for the product to the open source community."

13 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. Solaris is a nice UNIX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In a lot of ways, Sun is the MS of the commercial UNIX world, but they have an impressive record of making contributions to the community. the most notable contribution was probably NFS, and Sun gave it away long before most of us had ever heard of the GPL. Solaris has lots of goodies in it, obviously including great NFS support, but also pleasant standardisation and maturity, which Linux still somewhat lacks. Solaris is also rock solid. Sure, Linux can have multi-year uptimes, but it doesn't really compare to Solaris. When you want to run a giant website with 100's of CPU's, you turn to Solaris, and you don't even care that you get raped on the price of the hardware.

    I imagine that Sun is doing this because they know they won't make any money pushing beige box PC's. (SGI sure didn't.) By just selling the OS, they may not sell a ton of copies, but the profit margins on software are pretty sweet, if you can pay off the cost of development.

    Well, it's 4:00 am here, and I am still at work, so I don't imagine this post was at all coherent. God Bless Orange Soda. cheese fish is moose.

    1. Re:Solaris is a nice UNIX by guacamole · · Score: 5, Informative

      I really doubt anyone is running a website on a 100 CPU server. Using a single large unix server as web webserver is just not very practical or economical. It is very easy to distribute the load between multiple cheap, comodity x86 servers. They scale greatly for this kind of application. Databases and such is a different story..

    2. Re:Solaris is a nice UNIX by mirko · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I don't quite agree.
      I am working as a sysadmin for a huge company.
      The reasons we chose Solaris are
      • Sun's support (with a SUN/GOLD => repairs are to occur during the working day)
      • Sun's hardware (really stable with a nice hardware-monitoring from the OS => we can detect a Power supply failure before it has some productive consequences)

      Now, the OS itself is quite simplistic, I mean you have to GNU-ize it a lot to achieve a comfortable level of functionalities (Apache, vim, bash -now supplied-, GCC! ...).
      I still wonder why they don't provide a decent ANSI C/C++ compiler that we need when it comes to patch/recompile some Apache module (Vignette requires the commercial SUN C Compiler to be rebuilt)...
      It's mostly a question of support and feedback from SUN and other developpers (Oracle, Vignette, Broadvision, Silverstream...).
      Now, considerig Solaris alone on a lambda/PC, I guess this is not as interesting as you lose functionalities that only Sun's hardware fully provides.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    3. Re:Solaris is a nice UNIX by Doctor_D · · Score: 5, Informative

      In 2000, I would have agreed with you that most sites would just throw a slew of linux boxes running apache to host the website. At my old job that's what me and a couple of others were proposing--we so wanted to get rid of the boss installed M$ IIS server--for many many reasons.

      In 2001, I got a job with Sun. I went to a customer site to monitor an E10k, and I asked them what they were running on it, when they said their website, I was shocked. The usual answer is a ERP system with a database of some sorts. I have heard of clustered E10k's hosting websites, but I haven't heard of F15k's running websites.

      So, since an E10k can only scale to 64 UltraSPARC II processors, you're right....as far as I personally know that no one is running a website on a 100 cpu system (which would imply a F15k).

      --
      "If you insist on using Windoze you're on your own."
  2. open sourced in the future by jukal · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Sun will also probably open source this product sometime in the future. As such, it will work with the community to put together a hardware compatibility list that expand the range of systems known to work on Solaris on x86.

    Interesting, maybe. But nowadays, open sourcing seems to mean everything between giving a quick peek into the sourcecode and releasing it under a license which poses no restrictions at all. Anyway, is there some pieces in the codebase that are especially worth waiting for - if the license would allow utilizing them for other purposes?

    1. Re:open sourced in the future by jukal · · Score: 5, Informative
      the open sourcing appears to refer to the hardware compatibility testing suite - not Solaris

      Yes, this seems to be the case in this article. However, I found this maybe more interesting one (Making Solaris open source)

      Clip (Sun chief engineer Rob Gingell, August 28, 2002 ):

      The really valuable thing to us is this community. Not all predecessor communities have agreed to operate on the same IP principle that the Linux community operates on. Getting by that is a real impediment to throwing open the kimono and saying, "Here, Solaris is now open sourced." So, some of it has happened, and we are working on the rest of it. We may never be able to do it all because we may never be able to reach an agreement with the originators of the stuff. In short, the answer is that we're just sort of chipping away at it

      This might be worth submitting to /. as a separate story if it has not already been here.

    2. Re:open sourced in the future by mark_lybarger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IIRC, version 5.2 was from Star Division, not Sun. If it was sun, it was released right after the acquisition from Star Division, thus under the Star Division license. StarOffice has always been, AFAIK, free for non-comercial use. The fact that it now costs a little lets those people who need the extras that OpenOffice doesn't offer get them at a REASONABLE price.

      SUN gave a HUGE contribution to the open source community by opening up OpenOffice. Distributions can now install open office by default with out any license issues. Even hard core GPL distributions such as Debian can have it in their stable branch.

      I really doubt that SUN is releasing their x86 version to gain desktop market. Contrary to the /. crowd, *nix isn't a popular desktop platform, and I wouldn't bet the farm that solaris is going to change that.

      There's a nitche market for users who like or want to learn solars to further develop their careers at places that spend huge money on SUN hardware. There's also 2-3 people who prefer it over other *nix variants but just can't get their hands on the hardware. I've got an ULTRA-5 sitting idle on my desk right now (and 3 in the next cube) because my P2-366 is easier to use. Should I need to prototype a web site in JSP, I guess it's available to save my laptop some ticks.

      As far as opening their sources, I don't think it's the solaris sources they're talking about, but the compatibility test sutes. The bread and butter for sun is solaris, hardware and support. By them protecting the internals of solaris (the API is open), they're protecting their support revenue. If they open source solaris, that opens the flood gates for other companies to offer support for their hardware and software. I doubt we'll ever see that from SUN.

  3. Halfway there.... by noelp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is good news - but one of my main uses for Solaris is an Oracle platform. Oracle no longer support Solaris on x86, which is a shame because Oracle 9i on Solaris 9 on x86 would be a very interesting proposition. Anyone know of any plans for Oracle to resupport x86 for Solaris? With Sun seeming commiting itself towards it, would it be a mistake not to?

    --
    'Internet! Is that thing still around?' - Homer Simpson
  4. Re:This is great... by guacamole · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Uh no. Solaris has been designed as a portable OS. It still fully supports lots 32-bit only sparc hardware and it might even boot in 32-bit mode on certain 64-bit sparc systems. Saying that Solaris is optimized for 64-bit hardware is probably wrong. The x86 might not be well optimized but I didn't find that to be a big problem. The biggest problem with Solaris x86 is that driver support is terrible. I looked at the HCL and I mostly see four, three, and sometimes two year old components. If you want to run Solaris on x86 you better plan your hardware purchases extra -carefully-.

  5. Re:This is great... by larien · · Score: 5, Informative
    From experience, I've been able to run Solaris 7 & 8 on x86 hardware in a lab environment quite stably. The biggest issues you'll find are:
    • No sound drivers for anything other than Sound Blasters; probably not a biggie, and you can download drivers for SB64/128
    • Pick your network cards carefully; check the HCL.
    • Poor/non-existent X support. You almost have to use XFree86 to get any useful X windows.
    • Poor support for IDE; DMA is limited.
    If you can work around that, you'll do OK, but linux will probably run smoother on commodity x86 hardware.
  6. Re:This is great... by chegosaurus · · Score: 5, Informative

    True, but a couple of points:

    > No sound drivers for anything other than Sound Blasters; probably not a biggie, and you can download drivers for SB64/128

    The one thing I don't like about Solaris on x86. I've *never* been able to get the OSS soundcard drivers to work on my system. (Dual CPU - something goes very screwy and system usage goes up to ~95%!)

    > Pick your network cards carefully; check the HCL

    True, but many non-HCL cards can be persuaded to work without too much trouble. I've got a great system, works beautifully except for the sound card, which I don't miss, and none of it is on the HCL. (Oh, maybe the SCSI cards..?)

    > Poor/non-existent X support. You almost have to use XFree86 to get any useful X windows

    Not so bad as it used to be, especially with the porting kit. The XiG Accelerated-X server, or Summit as I think they call it now (www.xig.com) is very reasonably priced, works with anything, and generally *rocks*.

    > Poor support for IDE; DMA is limited

    Solaris IDE support really sucks, even on SPARC. Give it SCSI disks - it loves them.

  7. Is Solaris that good? by evocate · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've heard many claims that Solaris is very reliable - more reliable than Linux. How much stability comes from Solaris itself, and how much comes from Sun's end-to-end control of the hardware? Solaris has had the advantage of running on machines that were not only well-designed, but designed and built to the specifications of the OS group. Linux has rarely if ever had this luxury. When Solaris 9 is running on ferrel x86 hardware, will it display the same reliability as it's UltraSparc sibbling? More importantly, will it even prove to be as reliable as Linux?

  8. Re:Easy solution... by irix · · Score: 5, Informative
    The "we can't upgrade because stuff will break" crowd really gets on my nerves sometimes.

    You must be a Solaris sysadmin. Let me give you a Solaris developer perspective :-)

    I have complicated package install scripts that rely on many of the old Solaris SysV stuff to be there. If it isn't, things will almost certainly break.

    The suggestion I would have is put the GNU stuff in /usr/local/bin for now - and this is exactly what Sun is doing. After some period of time, announce that you are deprecating the SysV coammands. Some period of time later (several releases) consider reversing the situation - make the GNU stuff the default, leave the old commands somewhere else.

    We still have plenty of customers running Solaris 7. When you have high availablility high transaction systems, you make upgrade moves slowly and carefully. I know this isn't the way Linux works, but Sun plays in somewhat of a different market.

    --

    Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.