Slashdot Mirror


(CD) Pirates Take to the Ocean

rammstein_rulz writes "www.cdfreaks.com reports that asian CD pirates now produce thousands of pirated VCD's on anchored ships in international waters to avoid getting caught. Malaysian marine police have been asked to be on the lookout for pirate ships"

17 of 308 comments (clear)

  1. Why use a boat.. by Perdo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When you can do the same thing at your desk?

    Someone tell those guys not to take the term "Pirate" litterally.

    "Suck Emma, suck. 'Blow' is just a figure of speech!"

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  2. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Krapangor · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nonsense. There is no death penalty in any state of the European Union. We are civilized people here. That's a reason why the US can't join the European Union.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
  3. Re:International Waters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I believe that a vessel in internation waters is subject to the laws of its flag country -- the country in which the vessel is registered.

  4. Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by reallocate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is an example of an unreasoned, apocalyptic extremism that plays into the hands of the forces the poster so adamantly attacks.

    Playing word games with "piracy" is pointless. Producing unauthorized duplicates of commercial products is known as counterfeiting. Most countries have laws prohibiting the creation and distribution of counterfeit goods. It's as illegal to market a counterfeit CD of the current flavor-of-the-week pop band as it is to sell fake Rolex watches.

    By glibly saying "the enemy of my enemy is my friend", all you've done is made more enemies: You have aligned yourself with counterfeiters, a tactic unlikely to draw support from the mainstream public.

    The enemies of your new friend are now your enemies.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by reallocate · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >> ...forcing prices to be artificially high is known as "Price Fixing.

      So what? Pointing to high CD prices won't legalize counterfeiting.

      This debate is not about the ability of college students to buy and copy music and movies as they see fit. The debate is about changing U.S. copyright law to ensure the interests of the public are addressed, rather than skewed in the interests of corporations with a lock on music distribution.

      If you seriously want to change the status quo, get to work. Otherwise, understand that unthinking assertions do more harm than good.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    2. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Need to pirate the songs? It's not a friggin' dialysis machine - it's a CD. You don't need the latest CD. You might want it, but you don't need it. If I want to make a CD called "Fingernails down a blackboard" and sell copies for $500 each, that still doesn't entitle you to make copies of it & give them away or sell them for what they're "worth". I don't want to pay $10,000 for a wide-screen plasma TV. Does that mean I can justify stealing one because it costs too much? How about the latest P IV or Athlon which probably costs $400 or more right now - we all know it'll be under $100 in a year or so. If Intel & AMD won't sell it for the $0.02 worth of raw materials it took to make it, are we morally & legally justified in stealing it?

    3. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Rather a broad judgement don't you think?

      Of course SOME people will always pirate stuff to get it for free, but there IS a magic number when it comes to buying things where people will just buy an original rather than deal with the hassle of getting it "for free".

      Take a real-life example that actually happened a week ago to a friend of mine:

      She found some local electronics store that was selling a new CD she wanted for $5 on a short promotional special. Rather than deal with the hassle of trying to get all the tracks on kazaa, etc. She just dropped $5 and has a nice original CD.

      If the CD was $15, she probably would've downloaded it.

      Myself, I have all of the tools I need at home to duplicate DVDs (region-free DVD-ROM, software utilities, and a DVD-R drive).

      I don't - the reason being the price of DVDs, which is usually reasonable value for the money. Why should I spend hours of time and effort ripping/re-encoding a DVD to make a copy when I can just throw down a $20 and have an original?

      My time and effort is worth more than the cost of the DVD, so I just buy it.

      So there we have it - at some magical price-point, people WILL buy stuff, if for no other reason than the amount of work it entails to get it elsewhere (and having an original "anything" is nice too).

      I trust I need not even comment on software companies like Adobe or Microsoft that sell their products in the hundreds or thousands of dollars, then whine about piracy...

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    4. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by Kierthos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You too are ignoring my point in favour of a particularly useless ramble over a point of grammar. Yes, I probably should have said "want" instead of "need".

      Big deal.

      Here's a big difference between going out and stealing that $10,000 TV and downloading a song. With the TV there is a tangible item. It is property. If you steal it, that store has a loss to their inventory. If someone downloads a song or an entire CD from a P2P service, no store has lost that CD or that song. They still have the same inventory as before, but perhaps (and this is the important part) only have lost one customer. Businesses exist to make money. I'm not going to argue that. Most businesses that don't make money don't stick around for long, government subsidized ones notwithstanding. But the business (in this case a music store) did not lose any merchandise. Someone can still come in and buy that CD.

      And how much does one song on a CD weigh? I can weigh the TV. How much is it worth? I can price TV's individually. It is worth more if it's a Top 40 hit? Some TVs are more expensive then others. How about if it's been the #1 song for 12 weeks running? What if it's a "B side" song? And some TV's are less expensive. It depends on the brand.

      Your arguement holds little merit.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  5. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    remember, this is the same as any "war". They are going to find a limited amount of anything (ie. drugs).

    "Some guy wen down to X and bought 200 pounds of pot."

    Newsflash: "Medicinal marijuana grower busted with 16 plants. An estimated 10oz's was taken of the streets. This marijuana would have gotten to a bunch of disabled people and AIDS patients. Glad that we saved the planet from these assholes!"

  6. Re:Hilarious by ponxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > but disasterous to their nation in the long run

    I'm not saying i agree with their methods, but how exactly is it going to be disastrous for China in the long run? No-one would buy this software there at full price as it's simply not affordable. With the pirated versions people gain knowledge and skills that can get them jobs everywhere in the world! And it advances Chinas computer industry, so until the US lays a boycot on them for lack of copy-right prevention it'll do nothing but good for the country, seeing it doesn't loose any profit itself

  7. Re:International Waters by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Well the legal status is probably similar to the radio stations that used to broadcast from offshore to holland. I don't know if this happenend anywhere else but the the netherlands is a small country with the heavy population centers near the coast. So a ship in international waters could reach a sizeable part of the population. This was done to avoid the laws on radio regulation and to avoid having their equipment seized constantly. The police could only interfere when a storm would knock the vessel into national waters.

    The same probably applies here. The pressed CD's don't suddenly become legal but the police won't be able to seize the equipment involved as long as it stays out at sea. Of course the old radio pirates went on to become legal radio/tv stations when it was shown that a large portion of the citizens supported them. I doubt the same will occur with cd-pirates.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  8. This sounds like more hassle than it's worth. by shimmin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If the ships used are registered in some nation's maritime registry, then that nation's laws still apply onboard, so why not just do it ashore in that nation? If the ships used AREN'T registered, then they have no legal protection against the coast guards or navies of _any_ nation that cares to harass them.

    It made a lot more sense back in the 1950's and 60's when Norweigian oil platforms in the North Sea installed some truly overpowered AM rigs and broadcasted music the BBC wouldn't play into the UK. (Paid for by the record companies who wanted the advertising.) Then, they were doing something that was legal in Norway, but not in the UK, and benefitted from being close to the UK, so a Norweigian maritime installation made perfect sense.

    Here, the pirates are doing something that doesn't benefit from being done at sea, so why bother?

  9. International Law is a Farce by Maul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There should NOT be very much international law. We already have too much. The fact that Bush wants everyone else to follow it, but doesn't want the US to be accountable to it is only an illustration of the very problem with international law. Every country has different values and societies.

    It is too hard to enforce, first of all. Second of all, it imposes the values of (mainly) the West on every country in the world.

    If Afganistan wants to make heroin and opium until the cows come home, let them.

    If Malasyans want to copy CDs and burn them, let them.

    Creating international "bully forces" to impose Western values on other countries isn't going to do anything but cause more people worldwide to become "terrorists" who are out to "kill the West."

    International law should be stripped down to cover war crimes like genocide. It shouldn't have any place outside the of things like that.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  10. Price point and region encoding by freeweed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One thing I've always wondered about is the use of region encoding, but on a much smaller scale. You mention how you're willing to pay $20 for a DVD, because you can't be bothered to spend the time ripping it - but what about someone who only makes $5 an hour? Is it worth THEIR time?

    I have rather well-off friends financially who don't even blink an eye at plopping down $500-$1000 a month for PC software, whereas with my student status, that's more than I make most months. So, I resort to what most students do, and still use the software.

    Now, we all know one of the big uses for region encoding is so that content producers can effectively price-fix their products: they know they'll still make a profit selling a CD for $5 in say, Malaysia, but not any more than $5 because the average Malaysian makes 1/4 of what the average American does (all hypothetically speaking).

    With a very large wage gap between the rich and poor in the US, it almost makes me wonder: CDs for $5 (still making a profit, remember)would sell boatloads to poorer families who normally would just download them. HOWEVER, the richer folk among us would buy the CD, even if it was priced at $50.

    Now the only thing left to do is have the **AA buy some legislation that allows it to check your financial status, and price your goods accordingly. "Look, we've nearly eliminated those evil pirates, AND we're being nice to the little guy!"

    Wow, I think I just scared myself.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  11. Re:Hilarious by freeweed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And of course as soon as they do that some bright person will buy a million or so copies for 7 riggit each, ship them to the US, sell them for $10 a pop and make a nearly $10 million.

    And that's one of the many reasons why things like Palladium are being developed - imagine region encoding on software. Except instead of a 2 or 3:1 price differential, we're talking 100 or 1000:1.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  12. Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 4, Insightful
    When you go to college (if you do), an ethics professor will teach you that not everything that is moral is legal, and not everything that is legal is moral. Maybe it will take a real ethics class for you to realize that the mere observation that an activity is illegal according to some standard is no argument at all that there is anything wrong with it.

    I suppose if you lived in the 60's you'd say "I don't care about your principles and arguments--the law is clear: Niggers go in the back of the bus!"

  13. Re:Freedonia, and "Micro Nations" by Catbeller · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At what point is a nation not a manmade structure?

    A nation, in the final analysis, remains a nation when it fends off attack by challengers to its status. Sadly.

    It is similar to my personal definition of intelligent life: a lifeform that shoots back at humans -- and wins. Whales would be considered ILF's if they fired frickin' lasers at the whalers.

    Nations that want to remain nations, even if they are floating platforms in the ocean or spinning city-states in solar orbit, must have legal, economic, or martial ability to defend and counterattack.

    Sealand exists because it isn't worth anyone's time to remove them. And a nation that simply removes Sealand will face really bad PR if they don't fabricate some excuse first: select 1) for pedophiles 2) for terrorists 3) for Drugs.

    If Sealand gets private support, as offshore tax havens do, it will continue to exist, bar provocation. The pirates, however, will be sunk. No one is looking, and no one cares.