More on Microsoft vs. Lik Sang

Posted by michael on Thursday October 10, 2002 @12:01AM from the crackdown dept.

Levendis47 writes "CNET's News.com is running an article on Microsoft's legal manuevers which have successfully shut down the Lik Sang ecomm store where they've been selling various game system mod chips including the OpenXBox Mod Chip. This leads me to two questions (and I'll admit my ignorance, faux or not, in order to get discussion on this topic): 1) When a customer purchases an XBox (or any game system for that matter) are you intrinsically "signing" an end-user agreement in the purchase that makes modding the device illegal? 2) Could a non-profit org setup an effort to have mod chips produced and "distributed" at the cost of production w/o legal repurcussions? (i.e. would not making a profit on XBox's hardware mods protect you from their wrath?) 3) I understand the whole DRM aspect of mod'ing for playing copied games, BUT, what about legit gray-hacks like the Mandrake Linux XBox project and such? It would seem to me that in the long haul, Microsoft would support such efforts because they could sell more devices (and potentially more software if they licensed an opensource validation library)... "

1 of 550 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Linux actually helps here..... by Querty · 2002-10-10 00:43 · Score: 2, Redundant

Because you can now run Linux on the Xbox, the mod-chip makers actually have a better chance in the legal squabbles.

The mod-chip becomes a "reverse-engineering" product, with verifyable "non-infringing" use.

I.e. since running Linux on an Xbox is perfectly legal, and you need a mod-chip to make it happen, the mod-chip manufacturer gets some legal protection, since it is not only used for "illegal" purposes.

P.S. IANAL, please Fla^H^H^HCorrect me if I'm wrong.