Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Microsoft Judge Takes His Case to the Public

Posted by Hemos on from the takin'-it-to-the-street dept.

An anonymous reader writes "The Washington Post reports: "About 15 months after the Appeals Court for the D.C. Circuit rebuked U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson for talking to the media in the Microsoft antitrust case, Jackson has formally filed his rebuttal.""

6 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Here's a by oever · · Score: 5, Informative

    more convenient link

    --
    DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
  2. The Island of Doctor Moureau by mccalli · · Score: 5, Informative
    And what is he, a scrabble champion or something? Do Judges REALLY talk like that?

    In The Island of Doctor Moureau (the original book, not the film interpretations), there is a human/orang-utan cross which speaks in what he calls "Big Thinks". The Orang-utan's idea is that if he uses big enough words, he'll seem really intelligent.

    When the book's protaganist flees home, he can't help noticing that most of the establishment (particularly his local vicar, as far as I recall), seems to be speaking purely in Big Thinks. I suspect our friend Mr Jackson is suffering from precisely the same syndrome.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  3. Re:Legal Times article? by maharg · · Score: 5, Informative

    here I think - http://www.law.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename= OpenMarket/Xcelerate/View&t=PubArticleDC&c=PubArti cle&cid=1032128635760&live=true&cst=1&pc=0&pa= 0

    --

    $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
    @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
  4. Re:So, the rules are bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Hence the unqualified use of esoteric terms like omerta is just as justified as a reference to "snrtRNA" in Natrure or even "M$" on these pages.

    It's closer to M$ than to snrtRNA. Indeed, snrtRNA is a value-neutral word, whereas both M$ and omerta are derogatory. Indeed, usually omerta refer's to the Mafia's "law" of silence (enforced by death...), so Jackson is indeed comparing the judicial establishment to a criminal organization.

  5. Jackson's full article at law.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    here

  6. A Little Known Fact by edward.virtually@pob · · Score: 5, Informative

    One of the most interesting "little known facts" about Jackson and the MS case is that Jackson was the judge who overruled Stanley Sporkin, who felt the FIRST Department of Justice settlement (over MS's illegal crushing of competition in the DOS and GUI shell markets) was far too lenient, and allowed MS to avoid any real punishment for the illegal basis for its monopoly position. Now Jackson is in Sporkin's shoes and probably wishes he'd not helped MS get away the first time.