Windows vs Linux On Security
e8johan writes "NewsFactor is running an article asking whether Linux really is more secure that Windows. I'd say that they miss to point out that Microsofts Office suite combined with VBA scripting makes Windows more insecure than anything I've ever seen, but they do make some good points, especially when discussing Open Source and security."
The inspector related that the government's tests had indicated Linux was pretty weak on security. Apparently they feel that the open (he called it "promiscuous") development model meant that there were no controls, verification or even logged history of who checked what in, meaning that terrorists or spies could have planted trojans in there. (He also had problems with the stability, but that's not really a security issue so he couldn't make me deinstall for that).
Anyway, I obviously lodged a protest but it came right back with a stamp on it: "Linux is not being considered until the development model is safe." I guess they get a lot of requests like mine.
Second, those hackers smart enough to code for Linux have generally been smart enough to move to America and get an American citizenship. They are smart enough to understand that what keeps Americans safe is the 2nd Amendment. They are no longer crouching in their stinking hovels with nothing but a Dell laptop to their names.
You may call Linux a hobby, but think of a guy with a woodshop in his basement. Would you rather use a bookshelf that he himself lovingly made from only the finest parts or would you rather buy a $15 piece of laminated crap from WalMart?