Slashdot Mirror


Another iPod Competitor

rael9real writes "NOMAD has intoduced a new player. It has USB 2 and FireWire (finally), and supports WMA and MP3. It has a 20GB drive like the high-end iPod, and supposedly holds more music because it supports WMA (though why someone would want to use WMA is beyond me). It *is* cheaper than the iPod, though. Looks like a definite competitor. Maybe it'll drive iPod pricing down." Update: 10/14 21:21 GMT by T : Note that the listed specs for the player mention only "USB," not USB 2.

15 of 409 comments (clear)

  1. Gotta say it... by Drunken+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Will it support Ogg Vorbis?

    --
    Have you been stalked by Seth today?
  2. iPod fun not just music... by guacamolefoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...part of the fun is doing other stuff with it and the community/culture of hacking it to do other stuff besides just play MP3 files. How much fun will the Nomad provide, and will it be able to generate the same sort of interest?

    And oh yeah...what about ogg? (sheesh)

    guac-foo

    1. Re:iPod fun not just music... by sweetooth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't see why you couldn't do the same things with the Nomad. What's differant is that Apple supported additional features out of the starting gate while Creative doesn't appear to. Also, Apple has great software support for the iPod. iTunes is a very nice piece of software, and frankly Creative Play Center is crap IMO. The interface is clunky and overcomplicated. As far as Ogg goes I don't think we'll see it on any of the Nomads right now. Then again, it's not on the iPod either.

  3. OGG! by c0wh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would buy this as soon as possible if it played OGG. I suppose we need to make it clear to the manufacturers that OGG support would be beneficial to sales.

    Perhaps we just need to give OGG time to become more pervasive.

    1. Re:OGG! by hendridm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > OGG support will not be beneficial to sales.

      I'm not so sure about that. A large portion of the typical portable player audience is probably geeks. If there was a single popular player out there that was the only one to offer Ogg, I can bet a significant number of the millions of Slashdot readers would take notice. Maybe it would only cause a 2% increase in sales the first year, but would the extra revenue be worth the firmware changes? Apparently not, according to Nomad, but I think there is something to be said about being the only OGG product on the market with any sort of brand recognition.

      You gotta remember too, when the average customer talks to a typical blue shirt at Best Buy, the salesperson will say "Well, this one gives you an extra hour of playback at a *higher* quality than the others." Even though the customer may have no clue what OGG is, the salesperson does.

      Contrary to popular belief, that computer salespeople at Best Buy are not all nitwits. Most of them know what they are talking about but are hindered by corporate policy.

    2. Re:OGG! by stungod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Damn straight! That and BeOS support too. You might as well make the whole leap to technically superior and obscure. Then you can feel totally oppressed.

      Honestly, I totally agree that .ogg support on all audio devices would be a good thing. But you also have to take into account the extra time cramming .ogg support on the embedded decoder vs. the typical consumer's wishes. It's hard to admit from the geek's standpoint, but there still isn't a real compelling reason on the vendors' parts to support .ogg. You probably won't see the shitty bundled software for Linux or even Mac for the same reason.

  4. WMA isn't *terrible* by ColGraff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's worth pointing out that, if you're just ripping your own CDs, WMA isn't a *terrible* format. It's reasonable size, reasonable quality. It can't compare to a quality ten ogg vorbis file, but then again I don't believe it's meant to. For portable devices, it almost makes sense - except, of course, for the lack of linux support. And if you want to do anything involving sharing music and putting it on your player, than of course the WMA DRM features can be - but aren't always - a problem.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:WMA isn't *terrible* by lunenburg · · Score: 4, Insightful
      That is until Microsoft changes the file format to lock out all the competition.

      ...or implements DRM measures to lock you out!

  5. Ipods are the only way :) by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I recently bought a ipod (windows 20gb version) after years of using minidiscs. All i can say is they rule. 1 hour charge time to 80%, firewire connectivity, ability to jsut use it as a external harddisk, the interface rocks. And above all they look sweet as well.

    Any competitor is going to have to do a lot to beat Apples domination of the market.

    If they do bring the ipods price down, it wont be a bad thing. Yes ill probably feel resentful cause i paid more, but what the hell. The morepeople that have iPods the better.

    Oh and if you have a Windows Ipod, dont use the enclosed software, use Ephpod, a fantastic bit of free software which is so much better than Apples bundled Music Match Jukebox.

  6. This is great and all but what about the software? by Kaypro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The reason iPod is such a great product is because it integrates perfectly with iTunes. Not only does the hardware interface become a pleasure to use but the software-hardware interface is seamless as well. The real question here is how well thought out is Creative PlayCenter 3. Assuming that Creative made the hardware intuitive AND made organizing/transfering your music to it just as good, then they may have something here, at least for PC users. God knows that the iPod for Windows and MusicMatch Jukebox is just embarassing to use.

  7. Apple innovates? by unicorn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At least with regard to the iPOD, Apple was late to the game. Archos had products on the market LONG before Apple released the iPod.

    Keep clinging to the fantasy, that everyone wants to be as innovative as Steve tho.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
  8. Re:Why not Ogg Vorbis? by feldsteins · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not Ogg Vorbis?

    I think it's because you're radically over-estimating the number of sales that such support would garner. I don't see any reson to doubt that the manufacturers do their homework and weight out whether adding such support would be a financial gain, a loss, risky, etc. A bunch of nerds on slashdot don't have access to the kind of market data that these guys have.

    Or at least one would think that they are doing their homework. Is there reason to believe that they haven't? I mean besides a bunch of slashdot nerds claiming that the first manufacturer to build in Ogg support would be rocketed to the top of the heap through the sheer volume of previously untapped sales?

    --
    You like your Macintosh better than me, don't you Dave? Dave? Can you hear me Dave?
  9. Re:From CDW, price is $399US by Eccles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So it's $100 cheaper than the same size ipod

    With a 90 day warranty, instead of one year. Perhaps they have less confidence in its shock resistance.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  10. Probably no price competitor by Xunker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While you may understandably think that a cheaper feature-for-feature iPod competitor would cause apple to drop the price on the iPod to match, there is reason this won't happen.

    It's a common misconception that Apple in the business of selling hardware and software, much like people think that Nike sells shoes.

    But Nike does not sell shoes and Apple does not sell computers. They are first and foremost Image companies, selling themselves -- they are their product. This is not a commant on quality, speed or anything of the sort, but it is on price. When you buy and iPod, you are first anf foremost paying for the the fact that is not simply a hard drive, decoder and DAC, but that it's a work of art put together by skilled Apple designers.

    This is why Apple won't bother to match prices, because they don't need to. Though brand names may be little more than stories we tell each other, they are more than enough to justify a higher cost on an equal product. If the iPod does the same but looks better and has a better backstory, people will have little trouble justifying the extra cost.

    --
    Hilary Rosen's speech was about her love of money and her desire to roll around naked in a pile of money.
  11. How long before Apple gives up? by sielwolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not to be an ass, but Apple has a bad habit of giving up on a market they have early dominance in (lot of topics on it recently... Newton for one. I guess you could say the same about the GUI based PC).

    So my question is this the end of their lead in portable electronic music? Sure, the iPod seems to be right up there now but how long before someone makes a product that is "almost good enough" but that is a) hell of a lot cheaper b) supporting the latest whims of the market (Ogg support for example).

    Apple seems to have a bad habit of being a Dad: "Oh no, silly user! You don't need that! haha! Trust my judgement!" Then everybody goes off to more friendly shores. Any evidence they won't do it this time?

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?