Slashdot Mirror


Email Over High-Frequency Radio in West Africa

Guillaume Filion writes "LinuxJournal has a fascinating article about Radio Email in West Africa over HF links. 'Deep inside the warm green interior of Guinea, centered in the frontal lobe of West Africa, field personnel in the widely scattered village-towns of Dabola, Kissidougou and Nzerekore now enjoy access to regular internet e-mail, directly from their desktops. Here we have bridged the digital divide, and there isn't a telephone line or satellite dish in sight.' Talk about Wireless Fidelity!"

36 of 192 comments (clear)

  1. Reminds me of Packet Radio by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Informative
    Amature radio buffs were into packet radio years ago, I don't know if it's still alive, but some I knew were sending the usual* chit-chat over 2M.

    * "Hi", "How's the weather at your house", "Are you going to Dayton?", "Can I ride with you?"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Reminds me of Packet Radio by HeelToe · · Score: 3, Informative

      This isn't quite HAM packet radio. Packet radio on HAM frequencies disallows gatewaying content to/from the internet at large.

    2. Re:Reminds me of Packet Radio by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is EXACTLY packet radio, without FCC-imposed limitations of what one can or can't do with it. While the article is deatiled and pretty interesting, that obligatory /. "is this news?" is still in order. HF packet radio has been around for a long time.

      If I can find out what freq they're on, all their mail are belong to us.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    3. Re:Reminds me of Packet Radio by FuryG3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't belive they disallow gatewaying to the internet. As I posted earlier, the whole 44.x.x.x class a is delegated to amateur radio operators. Many try to set up tcp/ip networks independant of, but connected to, the internet. Now, when it comes to browsing pr0n from your laptop using your 2 meter gateway at your house, that's a different story. First, things like that aren't allowed on the HAM bands, so you could go buy a license for buisiness bands or something, and second, downloading celebrity nudes at 19.2k probably isn't my idea of a grand time.

      I've used my kenwood th-d7 to irc many a time, but on private channels where i know nobody will be swearing etc.

      Encryption is not allowed, but I must say that I'm guilty of visiting the occasional ssl site, and I'm not totally sure how the FCC feels about that.

      -k6gnu

    4. Re:Reminds me of Packet Radio by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Pretty funny since there are gateways all over the net for this! You just have to be verfied by the operator of the gateway as a ham. Simple phone call, or e-mail would get initial verification. The next would be monitoring your use and making sure you don't use it for what it's not intended for (ie sending porn to other ham friends). This is the act of being a conrtol point operator. You are responsible for everything your station sends as the control point operator. When using a HT you are both the radio operator and control point operator, but sometimes you are not the one talking. Hence repeaters using volunteer control ops that listen to the local repeater via base station or handheld radio. There IS NO FCC Law or restrictiong regarding the use of packet radio except Part 97. Basically you can do whatever you want with it so long as you don't make money(have a pecuniary interest), and you don't send questionable content such as porn, music or other stuff otherwise against Part 97. Transfering MP3's over packet radio would be illegal as MP3 is music. Only way you could do that was if your the space shuttle (only exception to music in part 97 and this is because of the rebroadcasts of shuttle missions. Part 97 does not have the word internet in it and the word network only comes up once and that's in the line stating that a frequency band in the 220 MHz range is to be used for digital packet backbones. Other then that, this is NOT news. I transmitted a packet e-mail cross country before I ever sent a e-mail across country. HF so far has been limited to about 300 baud. I think the most you can do wirelessly using amateur radio is 14.4k(on 2m and maybe 440). The reason for this is because the faster you want to go, the wider your signal gets(hence the term bandwidth..). That's why there's a restriction for 300 baud on HF Frequencies. This may have changed as I don't really have all that much time to keep up on the digital modes. I don't think much has changed though with the excpetion of a couple guys were expermenting with using lasers for voice and possibly data (Would be THz range for RF I think).

      --

      Gorkman

  2. In other news... by dubiousmike · · Score: 3, Funny

    West Africans now can order Domino's over the internet.

    Drivers carry less than 20 shiny rocks and buttons on them.

  3. Future of networking by shrikel · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It'll be nice when there are no wires ANYWHERE. The way trends are going now, in a couple of dozen years all communication between people and devices will be wireless.

    If you think about it, much of the last 2 decades' innovations and progress have had the effect (deliberate or not) of making life (at least for those who could afford it) more open and footloose. The company I work for used to have a Chicago address, just because nobody would believe that a large, international, reputable organization would be based in Salt Lake City. Nowadays nobody even thinks about that sort of thing. Even now, with telecommuting technologies, it's not necessary to have all your employees come to the office every day. Maybe in the future, the term "headquarters" will be obsolete, because organizations can be so distributed.

    Okay, it's a little off-topic, but the article makes me think about the steps we're taking, technologically, and where they're leading.

    --
    Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
    1. Re:Future of networking by Shamashmuddamiq · · Score: 3, Insightful
      ...all communication between people and devices will be wireless.

      I don't buy that at all. Although it would be nice, it will always be cheaper and more practical to, say, run a wire from your computer to your monitor than to have wireless hubs in each device.

      It is certainly cheaper to go wireless than it used to be, and I think technology will help us get rid of some of the more restrictive and inconvenient wiring, but your prediction sounds a lot like the empty promises of old...like "someday everyone will drive a flying car", or "in the future, everyone will use conveyor belts instead of walking to their destination."

      Technology obviously helps us in many circumstances, but much of the time it's just too expensive to be convenient.

      --
      ...just my 2 gil.
    2. Re:Future of networking by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fortunately, I've invented a new invention which I intend to patent. I call it multiple current storage devices. Or "batteries" for short. You plug your device into a wall socket and there are no wires to trip over. I think it's going to be very popular for use with wireless devices.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    3. Re:Future of networking by shrikel · · Score: 3, Insightful
      it will always be cheaper and more practical to, say, run a wire from your computer to your monitor than to have wireless hubs in each device.

      Will computers still be so modular as they are today? I mean, the iMac has been around for a while and it's not modular. Even though I don't find them very aesthetically pleasing, I saw a single-unit computer the other day while I was looking for a new monitor, which I thought was really cool. It consists of a flat-screen monitor with the computer built into the back of it.

      I think that computers will become less modular than they are now. (Probably not production computers like servers and whatnot, but I refer to user-end models.)

      As for other computer-related things, like keyboards, I think wireless will also become more popular there. You said "it will always be cheaper and more practical" to run wires. Well, with wireless becoming easier and easier, "practicality" might be rated not on price of the unit in question, but on convenience. I, for one, prefer a wireless keyboard and mouse because I hate the wires limiting my mobility.

      The other term you used is "cheaper." A device that uses wireless connections doesn't need a long cord. That's savings right there. And while wireless IS a touch more expensive to make right now, soon the price involved may be low enough that wireless is economically easier. Especially when you need multiple connections to a device. A TV (or other video device) needs several IN and OUT jacks to connect to all the things that people want them to connect to, like Antenna, VCR, DVD-player, etc. What if there was just one transceiver that could communicate both ways with all those devices? And your computer? And your WiFi remote? Forget directly programming your VCR or even your TiVo. You could just do it all through your computer.

      You could run your whole house through your computer, without expensive interconnected wiring for everything. Have your computer turn on all your lights while you're on vacation. And if you get a new device, it'll already link with the rest of everything, so you don't have to run new wires even to a central hub.

      I know, I know, it's what visionaries have been predicting all along, but now we can see a direct path from where we are now to where we could be. (Unlike with flying cars or ubiquitous conveyor belts.) I don't KNOW that this is the path that society will take, but I don't find it too far-fetched.

      --
      Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
    4. Re:Future of networking by ibennetch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's being said in various ways in response to this, and I agree... wireless will never completely take over for wired solutions. In some places (top of a mountian with my laptop and handheld ham radio, or the article's mention of West Africa) it's better and easier than wires; in others (wireless phones) you can tunnel additional information on a single type of connection...but there are a few reasons wireless isn't going to take over.

      Speed: Generally speed isn't very good on wireless connections. Show me how to get 100megs/sec out of any common wireless connection. This is the wired standard - but you need the bandwidth in wireless connections, and that leads nicely in to my next point:

      Bandwidth: Anything wireless needs bandwidth. Generally faster means more data which means more bandwidth. There is a finite amount of bandwidth. It's pretty much maxed out already (In the US at least; there's lots of military applications, broadcast TV takes a chunk, radio, the ham bands, cell phones, satellite signals, radio astronomy...etc). There's only so much usable spectrum. To put it another way; what happens when your entire city/company/neighborhood/household runs on one connection (t3/t1/cable/dsl respectivly, just for the example)? you oversaturate the avalible bandwidth. Same thing would happen with wireless. If the entire country starts using HF bands for email; your avalible connection speed is going to be shared across thousands of connections...making checking your email a pain in the rear.

      Cost: Look at the cost of a wireless NIC compared to a wired NIC of the same approximate bandwidth capabilites. Do they even make 10meg cat5 NICs anymore? 10/100 seems to be the standard, and even that is cheaper than a wireless card that only can do 11 megs at it's peak.

      There are more but I'm tired of typing...just got back to the room after a long day in the rain. Message me or reply if you have questions or comments. Feedback is welcome!

  4. Yes, But.... by LordYUK · · Score: 5, Funny

    to use this service, you need to send them 2500 which will be reimbursed when they transfer the rest of the money out of their respective repressed country!

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
  5. picking nits by Faggot · · Score: 5, Informative

    The term 'baud' refers to 'lever transitions per second', not 'bits per second'. Baud and bps coincide at 2400bps and lower; however above 2400bps each baud carries more than one bit of data. Therefore, the term 'baud' becomes incorrect.

    'bps' is faster to type anyhow.

    --

    But what do I know. I'm just looking for anonymous gay sex.

    1. Re:picking nits by BLBishop · · Score: 3, Informative

      And it isn't really "levels," it's "symbols." A symbol represents multiple bits in modems from 1200 bps up, and some of these symbols have identical levels. Instead, they differ in phase.

  6. SailMail by linuxwrangler · · Score: 5, Informative
    This setup is very similar to SailMail which I have used on several crossings of the Pacific. Yes, it's really slow but that's not a big deal when you are just sending a few paragraphs of text around.

    The last time I sailed across the ocean last July (in the Pacific Cup Race) we used an Iridium phone with the data option. We were able to send back a couple of digital pictures but the phone bill for the week was something like $200. Next time we'll save the pix till we hit land.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
  7. Its a step up by john82 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Before this, they were using carrier pigeon to transmit email. Just establishing a connnection to the mail server was a bitch.

  8. Yes, the previous method had many flaws. by Prince_Ali · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tiny bandwidth, monstrous lag, and packet loss caused by German machine guns.

  9. Nigeria has plenty of money floating around by codepunk · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would assume that nigeria could easily fund getting the whole country high speed bandwidth. I cannot begin to tell you how many emails I get a day from nigerians that wish to send me millions of dollars just for doing a simple bank transfer.

    --


    Got Code?
  10. How they would benefit... by Demon-Xanth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A doctor could email a hospital of some symptoms in the field and get a reply of what the illness and proper care for it is. Although the individuals wouldn't get a benefit directly there would be an indirect benefit.

    --
    If you think education is expensive, you should try ignorance -- Derek Bok, president of Harvard
  11. You thought email was insecure BEFORE..... by FuryG3 · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...now anyone in the world can dial in and see your messages.

    Seriously though, hams have been doing this kind of stuff for a while, on various bands. BBSes and email are commonly used (and tied together). There are TCP/IP networks (granted, most of them on bands like 2m which have higher throughput) with internet gateways. As a matter of fact, amateur radio operators have their own Class A (i belive it's 44.x.x.x)

    PSK31 is used on the HF bands and gives you a real matrix feel. You can see the information coming down throughout the band, and click on the stream to see the text moving through it. Here's a screenshot: http://users.skynet.be/on1dht/media/rxpsk_scrn1.gi f

    definitly cool stuff.

    73, k6gnu

    1. Re:You thought email was insecure BEFORE..... by dissy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      About the 44.0.0.0/8 block, more info can be found by its maintaniers..
      http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/

  12. Why so slow? What about contention? by gpinzone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How does this system organize the data streams? What if two people miles apart transmit their message at the same time on the same frequency? How does it handle contention issues? They have an awful lot of bandwidth to transmit so the messages should be pretty "bursty" and fast unless they're downloading entire web pages and such.

  13. What? No Mention that the Linux Kernel by zentec · · Score: 4, Interesting


    supports this already through the ax25 modules?

    This ties amateur ax.25 protocols directly to the Linux kernel. Works great, lasts a long time.

    I suspect the "commercial" modems in use were transmitting in something other than ax.25, probably sitor/amtor/pactor, but it's all about the same at 300 baud.

    The advantage with Linux is that you have to configure one driver for tcp/ip as opposed to dealing with the mgetty and ppp nonsense in the article.

  14. Africa has an advantage by kmonty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is really the core of the train of thought in Africa. Most of the central African governments are looking at 802.11 type net access as a cheap alternative to putting in expensive infrastructure like telephone lines.

    In South Africa it's even more interesting: there is a definite shove in getting broadband net access working - and working well. In fact, the recent de-monopolising of the Telecoms Company Telkom has finally opened the door for broadband.

    The key advantage, however, is somewhat ironic - in fact, the reason is simply that Africa does not have any decent infrastructure to begin with, this makes it easier to climb in with the leading pack and use leading technology from the start.

    The problem with 802.11 is however that it is unreliable. I've had the opportunity of working with a few wireles net-frastructures using 802.11 to connect a multitude of willing volunteers to various wireless wans and lans. Unfortunately, the best uptime stats we had was around 89%, comparable to the 99.9% uptime we enjoyed with one of Africa's biggest ISPs namely iAfrica.

    African countries have been connecting rather well to the net over the last few years, and doing so beneath the radar for the most part. It however will most likely not become the multi-million dollar industry like it is in the western world, but the key importance of connectivity in remote African cities and Towns is not to establish capitalistic approaches, but rather bring vital services to poverty stricken people, and offer them the opportunities that many dream the Internet still carry.

    Recently I visited a very poor school where the classrooms were the great outdoors and they had one blackboard to share with several teachers. Some students were older than the teachers. The amazing thing was when I saw these kids faces when they saw a pictures of Africa and the rest of the planet we downloaded off the net via Satellite shown onto a makeshift projector screen.

    Stories like this should not surprise people. What surprises me is that people in the western world still think us Africans ride lions and chase each other with spears. Africa is poor, but their is a lot of technological knowledge about. And we have that one advantage...

    --
    "Diplomacy --- the art of saying "Nice doggie" 'til you can find a stick." Wynn Catlin
  15. Clover Digital HF by lenshead · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I used to dabble in Amateur Radio, mainly 2 meter packet. In those days, about 8 years ago, there were a number of digital HF schemes. About the best of them was Clover -- an AT-compatible board that used its own modulation scheme and protocols.

    One problem with HF is that the ionosphere has a large, time-dependant phase dispersion. It really procludes wide-band schemes unless someone can come up with something very clever.

    The Clover board claimed 500 characters per second, under good band conditions, through a 25 Hz cw filter. At the time, there was no HF scheme that came close.

    I have no idea if Clover still exists -- maybe someone on Slashdot can enlighten us.

  16. Re:It's sad really by friscolr · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I think that this is fantastic and has lots and lots of world applications. But why do I get the sense that what these people really need isnt wireless email to their laptops.

    Decent infrastructure has more benefits than you can imagine. My dad works for the World Food Program and that org has used many different technologies for communication throughout the world.

    At his last post (Nicaragua) they used Toyota Land Cruisers to get around. Those vehicles were equipped with a multitude of antennas, including some to communicate in the UHF range. For more remote locations they used motorcycles to transport satellite phones where needed. Now he's heading up operations in Angola and i'm not sure what sorts of techs they use there, but i've heard talk of satellite phones and in the capital, Luanda, he uses a cel phone (talking to him from MI, USA is a pain, phone cuts out and is quite laggy).

    While starving sucks, it sucks even more when you can't communicate with anyone that you are hungry. In the past it was necessary to physically visit every single location to see how situations were there. Now, with better communication devices, when something serious happens (hurricane, landslide, refugee influx, etc) it can be communicated much quicker, response times are faster, and more lives can be saved.

  17. Good MTA, perhaps, but Open Source? by AirLace · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone notice how the author spends the bulk of the article talking about a mail setup using the prorpietary qmail MTA (which has a look-but-don't-touch license that's in many ways more restrictive than Microsoft's Shared Source) and then goes ahead and praises it as being Open Source in the last paragraph?

    It's funny the LinuxJournal editors didn't pick up on this (the article has already been published in print). I mean, there's nothing wrong with using proprietary software where it's the best option, but calling it Open Source is a bit unfair to both the original author of the software (Dan Bernstein), and the developers of actual Open Source MTAs like postfix, exim and sendmail.

    1. Re:Good MTA, perhaps, but Open Source? by Electrum · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does a two year stint at the ISC maintaining the BIND 8 resolver and tree propagation code count? Moreover, I'd like to think that there are those who are perhaps younger and smarter than me who might be able to "fuck with" and actually do something new with the given software. That's what open source is all about.

      Oh, I get it now. You are spreading FUD about Dan's software because he can write secure DNS software and you can't?

  18. Re:It's sad really by dogfart · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Not true. According to the CIA factbook ,

    Guinea possesses major mineral, hydropower, and agricultural resources, yet remains an underdeveloped nation. Let's ignore the mineral part, and note that agriculture is probably to mainstay of most of the population. Internet access, by supporting better agricultural management, will help improve productivity in this area. For example:

    Market and commodity information to assist in export

    Botany, the science of plants including pest control, plant breeding, etc.

    Etc.

    Maybe they don't wire to find out what a Big Mac tastes like, but they may ask about financing export, funds for development projects, scientific information on crop cultivation, etc.

    There is more to the Internet than games and pr0n.

    --

    "dope will get you through times of no money better than money will get you through times of no dope"

  19. For those actually interested in this topic... by DaoudaW · · Score: 5, Informative

    Volunteers in Technical Assistance (VITA) have been doing packet radio in the third world for years. Here is their page on communication technology.

    The page also describes their LEO satellite system which is just now coming on line.

  20. Re:Can the click-clack language by bjtuna · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, yes. Typically, a "click" (pop your tongue against the top of your mouth) is represented as an X. For example, there is an African language known as Xkosa, pronounced click-kosa.

    (The only reason I know this is because my Natural Language Processing professor spent most of the first lecture in September using Xkosa an example.)

  21. One correction... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    14.4 is definately not the fastest you can go.

    The GRAPES and WA4DSY modems are (I believe) 56k units, designed for 440 and above. (One of those might be a G3RUH-compatible 9600 design...)

    In Europe, 76k on 440 is common, and the Baycom folks have quite a bit of hardware for this.

    Some guys in Slovenia are doing 1.1 Mbps in the 1.2 GHz band.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  22. any encryption planned? by HealYourChurchWebSit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So is any encryption planned? There are some sections of West Africa that are still politically volitile. I can see where field workers, such as Doctors Without Borders and/or missionaries and/or UN Officials might not want their information intercepted.

    I realize that sending and receiving individual messages should be strongly encrypted, but that still doesn't necessarily obfuscate the sender or the receiver. I mean I'm glad to see such email used as the article says " the radio equipment, providing an essential lifeline for the safety and security of field office and mobile unit personnel" ... but I'd hate to see the same technology triangulated against them.

    --
    --- have you healed your church website?
  23. Wire is cool by billstewart · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Wire is cool. Huh huh.. huh huh... (Sorry, but the pun was just sitting there unused...)


    Wireless is fine for low-speed connections, or medium-speed connections that don't have to go very far, and can either interoperate between multiple users in the same space or else do some non-interference trick like spread spectrum. And it's really nice to have freedom of movement and ability to get some kind of service wherever you are, which means wireless in the most general case (though LANs with DHCP and VPNs are a good start.)

    But fundamentally, wire-like technologies (including fiber as well as copper) are much more practical for high-speed connections, and can fit arbitrarily large capacity in a given area because separate wires don't interfere with each other, unlike multiple sets of radio waves. For high-speed connections over non-short distances, wireless needs line-of-sight, while wires don't need to be in straight lines, can leap under tall buildings at a single bound, wrap around mountains and curved planets, etc. Also, the physics for devices that mess with wires make it easy to put huge bandwidths on a fiber, limited by the cost of the high-tech equipment on the ends (which gets Moore's Law kinds of price/performance effects) - practical bandwidths get into the gigabit range for cheap short-distance equipment ($59 at Fry's) and into the terabit range per fiber for long-distance telco-quality equipment.

    There is some relatively high-speed line-of-site equipment that can fit multiple separate connections in nearly the same space - free-space optics is the most focused, and there are microwave systems that are pretty tight. They can't do long distances, because of weather as well as because of the earth's curvature, but some of them are in the half-gigabit speed range over a few kilometers. They're really nice as a backup for building data feeds - they get rain fade, but they don't get backhoe fade, don't usually need permits to cross highways, and are surprisingly tolerant of earthquakes.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  24. UUCP instead of TCP/IP by kriston · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was reading this until I got to the description of the PPP link and remembered the days of UUCP over serial lines. Since the modem took care of the error correction they could send much more data more quickly by using straight serial UUCP instead of trying to get a PPP handshake to get TCP/IP working. A UUCP chat script was always faster than PPP in my experience.

    Kris

    --

    Kriston

  25. Re:encryption and ham packet by kbielefe · · Score: 3, Informative
    Yes, using SSL or SSH is illegal on the ham bands. The purpose of the "private codes" rule is to ensure that the other rules are being followed. If your transmission is encrypted, how can they know if you are discussing business or downloading obscene material?

    Bottom line is, if you want secure transmissions don't use the amateur radio service. If you really want secure transmissions, don't use wireless at all.

    However, I don't think the FCC will come after you for encrypting a password, like how hotmail uses ssl for login and then drops it afterward. They've always supported the right of private access codes for repeater control, etc.

    I think hams are accustomed to a certain lack of privacy. It's the price we pay for free bandwidth.

    73 de KD7KME

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.