Slashdot Mirror
LOTR Director's Cut Reviewed
popala writes "The first review is in on Home Theater Forum. There are a few screenshots from the unseen scenes and the whole thing is reviewed dvd by dvd! Although I don't like the review itself - I think it is a bit dry and not very journalistic, I do think it is still worth a read - even just a glance of the screenshots from cut scenes."
oh my almighty god, i'm just the second poster, but that forum has already been /.ed
Slightly offtopic, but this always amazes me. Why oh why are people surprised that an article gets slashdotted straight away? Do you expect it to get slashdotted after, say, 150 posts? Knock,knock people - if it can hold up to the traffic to get us to 150 posts it isn't going to get slashdotted.
Try NetBSD... safe,straightforward,useful.
Half of them!
Dildo Daggins Vs Goblin Cox?
I am a Karma Library.
Brush up on your reading comprehension. I wasn't complaining about the caching. I was complaining about deleting the link. The slashdot effect is very temporary, so don't permanently break the link to fix a problem that won't be there in an hour or two.
Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.
I understood you perfectly. (Perhaps your thinking skills need a little work, though.) It's not their job to handle a Slashdotting, and it's inappropriate to call them idiots when Slashdot is the one causing the problem. Rather than complaining about them, you should complain to Taco that if he would cache sites, then webmasters wouldn't be forced to take down the linked content.
How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
You claim: "When you put up a site it's for the express purpose of letting interested people visit it." The slashdot effect prevents that. Slashdot is in a position to solve the problem -- easily. It's simply the ego of the
How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?