Slashdot Mirror


Building a Dead Silent PC

Jouster writes "The folks over at HardCoreWare.net have finally lost it. They built a PC that's well over twenty times quieter than their comparison PC (40 dB versus 65). And it's no sluggard, either: P4 2.80 GHz, 7200 RPM hard drive and--get this!--an overclocked to the max GeForce4 Ti 4200! The only fan in the entire system is in the PSU."

32 of 430 comments (clear)

  1. Not as loud, but its still a space heater by jeramybsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Those who forget the apple are doomed to reinvent it. Apple has been using large heatsink, air flow design, etc for ever since the blueg3 to keep there from being too many fans in the system.

    However, an Apple still puts out much less heat overall and I notice the article didnt even try to find a quiet cdrom. I have 2 in my PC and both are loud as the dickens.

    --
    Never overestimate the end user. -jeramy b. smith
    1. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Those who forget the apple are doomed to reinvent it. Apple has been using large heatsink"

      Who said Apple invented large heatsinks,airflow design, etc?

      I have been using large heatsinks, low powered quiet ducted fans, and passive coolers since the pentium days. My current machine has an 80x80mm heatsink with copper base embedded in it with an 80mm silent fan and its cooling an athlon XP 2100. The rest of my system is setup such that I have minimal airflow for the required cooling. Ducted air, large heatsinks, copper bases, etc etc..

      People have known about large heatsinks, passive cooling, etc way way way before Apple Computer started making PC's with passive heatsinks on it.

      Also, your post is irrelevant considering that Gateway, Dell, HP, Compaq has been doing the exact same thing in (many) of their systems as well for years. (check out dell optiplex, Gateway E-series, I dont know the compaq models, but I have seen some like this).

      Then consider the G4 cube. it was fanless, nice innovation. But then they put a loud as hell hard drive in it, the power switch went off intermittently due to overheating (it was heat sensitive) and they put a fan in it anyway when they put the 3D Video cards in it. (this video card fan was like a 40mm fan spinning fast as hell and it was not very quiet at all, all on top of a very very small heatsink which had plenty of room to be larger)

      Next, you are going to tell me that Apple invented thermodynamics? Please. Don't try to pretend Apple invented everything. They didn't. And they are far far far FAR from the ppl who started making silent PCs. Everyone has been making silence (and mostly, reduced noise) since the begining of cooling weather it be for cars, power lines, space shuttles, oil pipes, computers, whatever.

      --
      Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
    2. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 5, Insightful
      And what aboutthe floppy drive? Those things are rarely used these days, but can be terribly noisy.

      Easy: take it out. Since last year, I've been building PCs sans floppy drives. IMO, floppies have very little use these days; files are regularly larger than 1.4 (or 2.8) MB, making floppies pretty useless. Most modern BIOSes can boot directly from CDROM. I've been using USB flash drives (a friend has a "pen" style, I like to use Compact Flash w/ a USB adapter), they're faster, and to the topic, make no noise whatsoever.

      I remeber taking over the lab to download the 20+ floppies for Slackware back in '93...

  2. Re:20 times quieter? by Karora · · Score: 5, Informative
    Please explain how something can be 20x quieter...

    Decibels is a logarithmic scale.

    So 10db is 10x (power), 20db is 100x and so on.

    This might seem like they are understating the case, but in general 10db is considered to sound like "a doubling in volume" so a difference of 40db is roughly 2 to the 4th or 16x.

    Fiddle with a few db more and you can easily justify "20x quieter."

    --

    ...heellpppp! I've been captured by little green penguins!
  3. I have to wonder...... by idiotnot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    exactly what this will do to component life. As you can see from the graphs they posted, the CPU and graphics card do run noticably hotter than with the stock cooling.

    To me, the small amount of noise created by a the stock CPU fan and graphics card cooler are worth the bit of extra noise.

    A very quiet case fan might be a good addition to this to help draw heat out of the case. That big plastic window doesn't help add anything to radiational cooling from the case, either.

    And my athlon isn't *that* noisy, especially when it's tucked away underneat the desk.

    1. Re:I have to wonder...... by Moofie · · Score: 5, Informative

      Radiant heat transfer is on the order of 10-100x less effective than convective cooling (like with a moving airflow). Radiant transfer varies as the fourth power of temperature, and does not turn significant until you get to temperatures that would a) fry any component you can name and b) give you a really good burn when you accidentally brush it with your leg.

      So the window, apart from looking stupid, doesn't really hurt anything. : ) 'Cept the faraday cage.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:I have to wonder...... by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 5, Informative
      Semiconductors aren't that sensitive to moderate heat, in the way that it would destroy them; if they get too hot, you will just have system crashes, random resets, etc. (as if that isn't bad enough).

      No, but heat kills bearings. So, the hard drive will probably be the first component to fail, especially with today's sensitive drives.

      Another mid-term problem would be the electrolytic caps. They will dry up over time, which will introduce sporadic instability/reboots at first, and you'll be driven mad searching for the cause. Almost impossible to detect without special equipment, i.e. an ESR meter.

      So, if you want a silent PC, you'd be better off buying cool components in the first place. It's just too much of a hassle (and expensive) trying to silently and reliably cool high power CPUs and graphics cards.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
  4. Longevity? Hardware Burnout? by beowulf_26 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think it's great that these guys did this, and I'm quite impressed at the hardware statistics and performance for such a quiet system. Although, there is a conspicuous lack of one element from the whole article...

    Longevity.

    While I've been desperately wanting a completely quiet computer that runs decently for some time now, I don't have the money to invest in a solution that is going to last only for a year or so. I guess I wish these guys had done more extended testing of their system.

    Has any other /.er made a comparable system? How has it lasted?

    Maybe I'm just a skeptic, but an overclocked GeForce 4 Ti with no active cooling makes me anxious, and somewhat hesitant.

    --

    --I hate big sigs.
    1. Re:Longevity? Hardware Burnout? by LordSah · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My solution to making my PC quite was very simple: I built a big-ass sound-insulating box for it. The box itself is made of particle board, lined with acoustic ceiling tile and carpet. I cut fan holes in the side of my original case, and mounted three fans to blow directly onto the CPU, memory and graphic board.

      The fans on the side of my case pull in air from a 20" long carpet-lined duct--it acts a lot like a car muffler. The air moves through, but the carpet absorbs nearly all the sound (the sound needs to make two 90 degree turns to escape the air channel). There is a similar duct in the back of the case for outgoing air.

      My 'new' case has more airflow than the computer originally had, so my internal temps are only a little higher than they used to be. I built the box with a weekend and ~$25. Now I can leave my computer on all the time without making my ears ring. If you've got access to a wood shop, it's a very effective way to make a quiet PC.

  5. Most Apple products have been silent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Most Apple products have been silent.

    Its one of the main reasons people like to buy them.

    Even some of the G4s (cube) keep the fan off unless critical.

    powerbooks are similarlysilent unless emergency fans kick in.

    The balance of other modesl, such as imac are designed with columnar "chimney effect" air flow out the tops.

    And many famous apples have no fan at all whatsoever, not even on powersupply : Apple II, IIe, IIc, IIgs

    Many musicians like the newer macs with sampler gear because they don't have to worry about systyem sound so much.

    External D/A in usb allows noise free amplification far from motherboard on most all mac models in last 3.5 years.

    Mac lovers hate noise it sems.

    I wish dual cpu AMDs could be made much quieter.

  6. Re:20 times quieter? by Roosey · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a logarithmic scale. The volume of the sound goes up ten times for every ten decibels. Here's some math and a comparison chart.

  7. I can think of one idea to get even cooler by Navaash+Fenwylde · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Those are some gigantic heatsinks. The processor heatsink alone is frigheting enough. But there does seem to be one solution that can be even quieter and can cool both Pentiums AND Athlons...

    Water cooling!

    It's certainly different, using water to carry off and circulate the heat. Obviously, it requires a large degree of trust, as one leak can short out your entire system in a heartbeat. I've been around these beasts, and they certainly seem quiet enough.

    I imagine they would be great for overclockers :D

    1. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by Moofie · · Score: 5, Informative

      No.

      Heat exchangers want to maximize surface area, not mass. You are trying to present the maximum surface to the surrounding airflow, cooling by convection. More mass would simply be a thermal battery, storing heat on the processor. The thin heat sink fins actually remove heat from the processor by transferring it to the surrounding air.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's one more aspect to that. When you have very thin, long fins, like the Zalman heatsinks do, the thermal conductivity is too low for the heat to be transfered all the way to the tips. From what I can see on the photos, these heatsinks are not as efficient as they could be. IMHO the optimal heatsink would have a tree-like structure, whith thick 'stems' conducting the heat to many thin, but reasonably short 'leaves'. The Arkua coolers seem to somewhat follow this approach.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
  8. Old news by Maniakes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The PowerMac G4 cube (bottom of page 4, "Noise characteristics") was only 31 dB. That's 2,512 times quiter than this "silent" PC.

    --
    A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
    1. Re:Old news by marauder404 · · Score: 5, Informative

      2,512 times quieter than the 65 dB machine:

      10^3.1 = 1,259
      10^6.5 = 3,162,277

      3,162,277 / 1,259 = 2,512

  9. Great news for Beowulf clustering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to my calculations, you can now cluster 100,000,000 PCs before their combined noise level reaches the threshold of pain!

  10. Standard Issue by BoBaBrain · · Score: 5, Funny

    My PC has a button on the front that eliminates noise completely. It eliminates those annoying lights on the case too...

    --
    I am a Karma Library.
  11. Cool... by Alien+Being · · Score: 5, Funny

    This one goes to -11.

  12. Re:Confusing headline... by valmont · · Score: 5, Funny
    [haleyjoel]

    *clinching blanket and pulling it towards face*
    "I can hear dead boxen".

    [/haleyjoel]

  13. Fanless PC PSU - THAT would be news by Brother52 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    CPUs and cases without fans are not very rare among brandname boxes (Compaq, for example), but I've yet to see a fanless PC PSU.

    Is it really that hard make? I don't mind it to be heavier or more expensive - the reliability (no moving parts) and noise level are much more important in a lot of cases (pun intended :)

    I was thinking about building one myself: old-style with a huge transformer, but then I heard that some powerful ATX PSUs can have their fans disconnected under reduced load. Can anyone clarify?

  14. Re:deciBells by Maniakes · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm not sure where this 20x quieter thing comes from, but generally. a 10dB increase in sound output is considered "twice as loud." Note that a 3dB increase is twice as much energy (well, 3.0something, but close enough). Similarly, -3dB is the "half power point."

    Your physics teacher will tell you that 10 dB is a 10x difference in the intensity of a sound wave.

    Your psychology teacher, or your friendly local audiophile, will tell you that a 10x difference in wave intensity is only a 2x difference in perceived loudness.

    Most slashdotters, geeks that we are, payed more attention in our physics classes. As a result, I forgot about the perception issue until just now.

    I am currently listening to 128 kbps mp3s on a $25 pair of headphones. Whether or not I am an audiophile is left as a exercise to the reader.

    --
    A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
  15. Re:20 times quieter? by Graff · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Please explain how something can be 20x quieter...how does this math work?
    It doesn't. Something can't be 20 times less than something else. You can either have something which is 1/20 as quiet as something else or something which is 20 times LOUDER than something else. It is complete nonsense to talk about something being 20 times less or 20 times quieter.

    This is a common mistake which people make, you can see it all the time even in professional settings. You will often see people saying stuff like, "This will be three times less costly than other solutions." It's a sad state of affairs but I think that math skills are seriously deteriorating.
  16. Silence! by Deton8 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'd accept a few degrees hotter silicon for the huge reliability boost of getting rid of the fans on the processor and graphics card (MTBF circa 15,000 hours in the real world contrary to their b.s. specs, divided by two since there are two of the little bastards). Your remaining fan in the PSU case needs a fan rotation alarm on it, and if unattended, some kind of thermal shut-off or redundant fan. One nice trick for quiet fans is to use one much bigger than you need and then run it at a slower speed. Another tip is to mount the disk drive and fans on Sorbothane standoffs, and maybe stick a couple of slabs of Sorbothane on the walls of the PC case. One quibble with the article -- for best cooling, you want as small a case as possible, not as big as possible. The objective should be to maximize the velocity of the airflow over the heatsinks, and you do this by constricting the space around them. One innovative way this has been done is through the use of engineering foams like E-PAC which allows the designer to create engineered air ducting which forces the airflow over the parts where it is needed. Some other people have asked why the PSU fan is necessary -- having just gone through CE and UL testing on one of my products, you can't imagine the kind of pain the test lab would make you go through if you took the PSU fan out of the PSU case. It's only a practical proposal for a major corporation with a lot of money and time to throw at it.

  17. Silent iMacs and Monster Heat Sinks by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 5, Informative

    The slot loading "original" iMac (aka the gum drop) had(has) no fans, quite hardware, and vents on the top of the case. I don't quite know if Apple's eMacs and LCD iMacs have a similar set up, however I'd bet that they have fans.

    Nevertheless, Apple still strives to build fairly quiet boxes when ever possible. I mean hey, look at the fan to heat sink ratio in this box: http://www.apple.com/hardware/gallery/pmg4_august2 002_480.html Honestly, I've never seen a bigger heat sink within a consumer PC. One could fry 10 strips of bacon on that beast.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  18. Re:I wonder..... by xercist · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, dB is a logarithmic scale, so 0dB is not actually *zero* like you assume, as 10^0 == 1. You could have something that was at -1dB which would be quieter than that. On this scale, "complete silence" really doesn't exist. It all depends on how sensitive your measuring device is.

    --

    --
    grep "xercist" /dev/random ...you'll find me in there someday
  19. More hardcore than hardcoreware by juventasone · · Score: 5, Informative

    The guys at Silent PC Review would scoff at the "hardcoreness" of hardcoreware.net when it comes to silencing PCs. After being on their mailing list for a year, I can tell you that they're waaay ahead of these guys in every aspect of PC silencing, many of which I've implemented myself.

  20. Why no sealed case? by PsyQ · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been using an acoustically sealed case from Noise Control. I really can't hear my PC anymore.

    I also use one of Noise Control's modified Enermax PSUs and a Silverado CPU cooler. That's all I did to my PC to make it quiet, everything else is stock. A quiet case seems to be the most logical (and least expensive) first step if you ask me. If you can still hear any of your components after you've put them behind 2 cm of noise blocking fluffy stuff, you can start replacing noisy those one by one until the noise stops.

    Noise Control now has their own fan control circuitry and new modified PSUs come with it built-in. Also, they have hard drive cages that catch vibrations before they reach your case. With all of that equipment it should be easy to quiet any PC.

  21. Re:20 times quieter? by Seahawk · · Score: 5, Informative

    mod this one down plz!!!

    +10db is twice as loud to the human ear!

    So the 65 db down to 40 db should be something like 5-6 times less loud to the human ear!

    Its the energy that is 10 times as big when you go up 10db!

    Example:
    A 10W stereo plays x db
    A similar stereo with 100W plays x + 10 db
    A similar stereo with 1000W plays x + 20 db

  22. A few nights ago I awoke in my sleep by Kasmiur · · Score: 5, Funny

    As soon as I woke I knew something was wrong. And looked around my room. Noticed it was darker than usual. After turning on the bedroom light I looked and saw my pc was off. Then I found out the power went out in the middle of the night. If it wernt for my pc and my wakeing up I could have been late for work.

    I actually find the gentle hum and whirl of my pc comforting. along with the blinking yellow light and the faint green glow it gives my room.

    --
    -THIS SPACE FOR RENT!
  23. ESR meter by extra88 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Almost impossible to detect without special equipment, i.e. an ESR meter.
    If you do decide to get one, just remember not to put it next to your RMS meter. they'll both get totally out of whack.
  24. Explanation of log by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here, once and for all, is a log scale mathematics explanation. I'm still a student so I remember something about it:

    Sound level is how loud a sound is to human ears. It can be measured in dB and an increase of 10 dB sounds ten times louder to human ears.
    Sound intensity measures the energy of the sound, often in W/m^2. (Watts per metre squared.) If you multiply the sound intensity by the face area of your eardrum, you'll get the number of Joules per second (W = J/s) that your ear is perceiving. This scale is linear with human hearing perception, so double the intensity means it sounds twice is loud.

    The Equation:
    B = 10log(I/Io)

    B = sound level in dB
    I = sound intensity in W/m^2
    Io = sound floor of human hearing, Io = 1x10^-12 W/m^2

    So, doing the math, 40dB = 1.0 x 10^-8 W/m^2.

    And 31 dB = 1.26x10^-9 dB

    So therefore, 40 dB is 7.94 times more intense, and therefore 7.94 times louder to human ears.

    (7.94 = 1.0 x 10^-8 / 1.26x10^-9 )

    Note: the previous poster's comment about one being 2,512 times quieter than the other was for different values, and this information does not override that person's (correct) calculation.

    Thank you, and have a nice day :-)