Mac OS X Built For CISC, Not RISC
WCityMike writes "One of the programmers at Unsanity, maker of haxies, recently posted a rather shocking relevation on the company's weblog. He says that Mac OS X's Mach-O runtime ABI (Application Binary Interface) comes from a NeXTStep design for 68K processorts, and is not designed for the PowerPC architechture. Had they used the latter, things would have been approximately 10-12 percent faster. And supposedly, they can't fix it now without breaking all existing applications." The developer mentions there are workarounds in the newest GCC, but only for newly compiled programs.
Maybe Apple Are Anticipating a Move to A CISC style processor in the future?
KARMA WHORE ALERT TRIGGERED!
Blöde Karma schlampe!
Lameness filter suck my di.ck!
Before you email me, remember: "There is no god!"
Macs are slow? I never knew!
Oh, get real. What the hell do I need Karma for, you ignorant dog-faced whore! I'm just trying to keep the damn article from vanishing, you poorly-bred, ill-begotten sh!t-mouthed bastard!
Heh heh heh.
suck my hairy dick mac luser.
looks like the mac is going to x86 arch to me.
once again slob on my knob.
>> Exactly. When Copeland comes out it's gonna be smokin'.
That's COPLAND like the composer, you insensitive clod!!