Debian, Past Present & Future
solferino writes "Christoph Lameter, a major guru in the debian project, has put up a very well written talk that he gave earlier this week that addresses debian's past, present and future.
He includes a good background history of the project, some interesting sets of figures and projections (30,000 packages by the end of 2004!), a good discussion of the pros/cons of source based distros and his ideas about a new package manager he is developing (uPM). In all a very good read, whether you are just now considering dipping a toe into the debian well-spring or have been drinking from the source for a long time already."
apt-get install first-post
"It's not the size of your package that matters, it's how many you have."
I imagine this will be similar to the catastrophic Y2K bug. :)
sig.
Oh come on, by then we'll have Toy Story 11 with a whole bunch of new funky character-names ...
Life sucks.
640 are plenty for all, I thought...
Unix makes easy tasks hard and hard tasks possible. Windows makes easy tasks easy and hard tasks $29.95.
Hey, careful with that joke, it's an antique!
Can you hear me, Major Tom? I'm not the man they think I am at home...
Debian developers are known to have strong convictions and it is easy to get into some old argument when the buttons of one group or another are pressed.
/. posters were debian developers as well.
heh, I didn't know all
1. Grow beard 2. Leave your job at AI labs. 3. Forget your hygiene. 4. Support free software that has a logo of your smelly feet. 5. Rant about the name of software that someone else has created and named. 6. ? 7. Profit 8. Rant about the kernel of Debian and make sure they will switch to The HURD kernel. 9. Wake up one morning, realize that The HURD is a piece of shit and.. 10. Shoot yourself.
Quit writing about the history of Debian and get to work on those packages!!!
Umm.. I'm not sure about this exponential extrapolation thingy. By the same logic, they would be supporting something like 120 architectures by 2006 :-)
...since figures have been done in M$ Excel... ;)
I'm pretty sure FreeBSD offers a set of binaries alongside the ports tree. Gentoo offers only the binaries required to compile the base system and then proceeds to compile it, and everything else, from scratch. Everything is optimized and whatnot, and it's probably easier to maintain the distro since there's no need for the developers to compile the binaries. The downside is it's slow to install/upgrade pkgs, especially if you've compiled glibc 3 times because it's been updated quickly. Also, occasinally I'll find things that fail to compile in the tree.
When all freedom is outlawed only the outlaws have freedom