Slashdot Mirror


Senate Bill to Subsidize Anti-Censorware Research

Senators Wyden (D-Ore.) and Kyl (R-Ariz.) introduced the Global Internet Freedom Act earlier this month, setting aside $60 million over two years "to develop and deploy technologies to defeat Internet jamming and censorship." Of course they don't mean libraries and schools in this country -- they're talking about countries like China, as Kyl et al. explain in a National Review article a few days ago. I guess it wasn't confusing enough to (1) subsidize censorware and (2) criminalize researching it -- we also need to (3) subsidize researching it. How about forbidding American corporations from trading censorware goods or services to these "repressive governments," wouldn't that be a good start? Update: 10/30 03:37 GMT by J : Here's the Wired story from early this month on the version that was introduced in the House.

(Sen. Wyden also teamed up last month with Sen. Cox (R-Calif.) on a little bitty resolution standing up for your fair use rights before the tank parade of the DMCA.)

2 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. Urban Legend by wunderhorn1 · · Score: 4, Informative
    As a Catholic, you should know better.

    Troll.

    --
    Karma: Bored. (Thinking about resurrecting the "Anyone else is an imposter" joke.)
  2. Glaring Loophole in the Bill by The+Importance+of · · Score: 5, Informative

    LawMeme points out a glaring loophole in the bill.