Slashdot Mirror
Another J2EE vs .NET Performance Comparison
Starting yesterday, we received a bunch of story submissions about a
performance comparison between J2EE and .Net. It didn't seem all that exciting, and we sort of ignored the story. But as usual, it appears that some people take issue with the methodology and conclusions.
The only things TMC actually proved are that they are
NOT J2EE experts
but they
ARE MS shills.
Everybody knows "benchmarks lie" as the old cliche goes. It's just funny that a chest-thumping "enterprise software" consultancy would so blatantly pitch a relatively un-scientific benchmark as a serious study.
Quote from the article: It contains both errors, halftruths, and lies.
Unfortunately, the article contains both spelling errors, grammatical errors, and errors of style.
Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
this is like trying to make a race between a tortoise and a snail, only to realize that your stopwatch doesn't go over 15 minutes.
Je t'aime Stéphanie
It didn't seem all that exciting, and we sort of ignored the story.
Maybe we could get a bunch of people to whip up a controversy about a benchmark whitepaper comparing performance of rcp and ftp.
"Provided by the management for your protection."
Unfortunately, the article contains both spelling errors, grammatical errors, and errors of style.
Great! The the author is sufficiently qualified to become a slashdot editor.
.NET is a lot faster
plenty of benchmarks on http://dotnetguru.org/
Yeah, I see that... from the URL.
Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
Well you're right, the average slashdot geek probably couldn't run from building 3 to building 4 anytime.