Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Another J2EE vs .NET Performance Comparison

Posted by michael on from the mine-is-bigger dept.

Starting yesterday, we received a bunch of story submissions about a performance comparison between J2EE and .Net. It didn't seem all that exciting, and we sort of ignored the story. But as usual, it appears that some people take issue with the methodology and conclusions.

2 of 480 comments (clear)

  1. And in other news by photon317 · · Score: 1, Offtopic


    CNN is reporting on a widely-publicized 1/4-mile drag-race between a broken lawnmower and an earthworm.

    --
    11*43+456^2
  2. Register was Wrong by copponex · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    From the newly updated article,

    But the benchmark throws up the remarkable statistic that the Java version required 14,004 lines of code, while the .NET version featured just 2,096 (and not the other way round, as we originally stated). The benefit of hindsight, or is one of our class libraries missing? ®

    Are all of your linux gurus just scared of MS having a better product or what? Here's a news flash:

    MICROSOFT ALREADY HAS BETTER PRODUCTS

    WindowsXP / Office XP / XP Server is still the killer app that people are buying regardless of the high cost, simply because there's no other product on the market right now with that feature set and ease of use. Now, most of their server stuff is expensive and slow for many web hosting applications, but don't discount their products just because of the Corporate namesake in front of them.