Sun To Continue To Go After Microsoft
Raiford writes "Sun Microsystem's has vowed to continue their pursuit of seeking damages from Microsoft in spite of the current ruling. A Reuters feature describes yesterday's ruling a setback for Sun and upholding light punishment on Microsoft. The current decision has not deterred Sun from pursuing a billion dollar suit maintaining a position of claiming significant harm from what they feel is clear monopoly"
Yeah, ya gotta give him credit for being a complete imbecile, willing to sacrifice his company (not really his anyway, as it's publicly traded) for a personal vendetta.
I hate microsoft as much as the next guy, but McNealy and Ellison are just whiny little bitches - it's just that Ellison can still (sort of) afford to whine; whereas McNealy is taking Sun down the shitter.
Having a monopoly that you have got by illegal business-practices and having a monopoly that you have got by doing good products are not the same thing.
Microsoft has been conducting some illegal business-practices but what have SUN have that would have been able to compete?
Have SUN at any time made a desktop that has been really viable and sellable. Honest. Don't think so.
With this in mind, maybe if Sun starts something now they are hoping that in two years there may be another administration that might think that monopoly power abuse is actually a bad thing and will pick up the ball then... It can't hurt to start something now with that hope...
It's psychosomatic. You need a lobotomy. I'll get a saw.
And when Bill's stock dips because of all the
negative publicity, that cash pile will have to
be used to prop up the stock price or else
Bill will have to actually start paying his
employees rather than just offer them stock
options.
This could get interesting.
Has anyone written up the implication for
MicroSoft if their stock loses value? Would
be an interesting read.
*sigh* back to work...
So, unfortunately, in today's screwed-up world, maybe the lesson that Sun needs to learn from this is to play outside the rules and fight like hell when caught. To the victor of that game go the spoils.
Sigs are bad for your health.
I think that Sun has lost more sales this year to IBM/Linux solutions, than to Microsoft.
Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind. -- Mark Harrold
Thanks to the criminality of Microsoft, and the ineptitude of (now) all three branches of the US government in dealing with that criminality, as well as the current "Welfare for Microsoft" campaign being levied by the US government ("Microsoft Everywhere"), all you can say is "I don't blame them a bit".
This was an extremely competent technology company, one that set many standards for innovation and openness.
Now they are a mere shadow of their former slf, primarily due to criminality of another company, one receiving aid and encouragement by a government that is supposed to foster the free market and competition for the good of it's citizens.
Shame on the US gov't for their toothless mediocrity. Go get 'em, Sun.
Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.
See my user info for links.
This could get interesting.
Has anyone written up the implication for MicroSoft if their stock loses value? Would be an interesting read.
Follow the stock market much?
MSFT is down more than 50% since it's high in late 1999. That's never caused them to seriously dip into their cash reserves.
In any case, any bad publicity they might receive from various civil actions will be more than counter-balanced by the fact that the DOJ case is over now.
Bullshit.
You don't know about the antitrust suit do you?
Microsoft has been in court for the past few years over antitrust violations. This means they abused their monopoly position to force an inferior product down people's throats. The government is only interested in this because it HURTS CONSUMERS because the very 'let the best software win' method fails to work under monopoly conditions.
Get a clue.
Bullshit, I've (or my parents when I was a lot younger) been buying computers since the days of XTs and I never bought one with an MS OS installed. Go shop elsewhere than Dell and you'll see you're free to buy what you want.
The fact is every other thing that tried to compete on PC wasn't very useful, DR-DOS sucked and was very slow with some applications, Gem and pre-3.11 version of Windows were pratically useless it's no wonder they didn't worked. And Lotus and WP didn't fly on windows because they were really bad. I was a die hard WP user at the time and didn't want anything to do with Word, first time I saw Word 2.0 for Windows I switched and never went back, it was just so much better.