Slashdot Mirror


Chocolatier Fights PanIP Uber-Commerce Patent

synerr writes "In October, Slashdot reported how PanIP sued 10 companies. Since they were so successful, they have launched 50 more lawsuits. The Ft. Wayne News-Sentinel has an article about how one local small town chocolate company, DeBrand's, is planning to fight back against San Diego based PanIP LLC's claim that they hold the patent over any automated commerce done by text and graphics on a video monitor. The owner of DeBrand's has even set up a web site to organize the different e-merchants, www.youmaybenext.com."

8 of 276 comments (clear)

  1. Fist Sport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Chocolate Panning is probably something anally queer

    1. Re:Fist Sport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Yeah, it is actually. Chocolate panning is when you take your partner's fecal matter and spread it thinly across your stomach. This is usually quickly followed by the "Dirty Sanchez," as they just seem so complimentary.

  2. I claim this First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    Aw,yeah.

    This quality first post is claimed for the Queen of Spain. Thank you, and come again.

  3. FP you cocksucking dicklickers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
  4. I hereby claim by cscx · · Score: 0, Troll

    I hereby claim all intellectual property to the <form></form> tags. You can find this here. I'll see your ass in court, Slashdot!

  5. Re:This will not be tolerated for long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    These lawsuits are complete crap. After reading the patent, you can see that it was intended as a Airline travel agent system...

    SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

    Accordingly, the objects of this invention, among others are to:

    enhance the travel agent's sales ability
    create a flexible travel sales system
    increase the sales productivity and information accuracy of vacation tour packages sold by travel agents; ...


    How did PANIP ever win the initial 10 lawsuits?

  6. Morons. by pongo000 · · Score: -1, Troll

    Great. /. tries to do the right thing and tell us about PanIP's predatory tactics, and then you guys (Timothy, this means you) turn around and slashdot their site.

    Yeah, the subject line applies to you, Timothy, and any other guilty /. party who continue to do good causes "favors" by posting links to their websites in a manner that is guaranteed to cause giant short-term traffic spikes. Why don't you guys think about what you are doing before posting direct links?

  7. Why does Slashdot denounce this? by devleopard · · Score: 0, Troll

    I thought Slashdot loved the idea of litigating companies out of business. Seems like an attempt at such made for some headlines lately.

    --
    The best thing about a boolean is even if you are wrong, you are only off by a bit.