Fake Your Own .Mac Server

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Posted by CmdrTaco on Sunday November 10, 2002 @07:58AM from the isn't-that-useful dept.

c13v3rm0nk3y writes "A clever fellow named Otto Moerbeek has publish a short article on getting an OpenBSD box to emulate a .Mac server. Using Apache/DAV/SSL and a roll a duct-tape, he describes how you can get most .Mac functionality without paying Apple for it." This is useful because then you can use apple's backup tools to backup to a local server, and not have to backup over your piddly internet connection.

17 of 257 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Bing Crosby by Anonymous Coward · 2002-11-10 08:00 · Score: -1, Troll

Is my man. Let it snow! CS_winternights!
fp by Anonymous Coward · 2002-11-10 08:00 · Score: -1, Troll

fp
Jumanji!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · 2002-11-10 08:01 · Score: -1, Troll

Eat me.
Why don't they just rename it to.. by Anonymous Coward · 2002-11-10 08:03 · Score: -1, Troll

MACDOT. God damn, we don't want to hear about fucking apples all fucking day.
Irresponsible? by cloudscout · 2002-11-10 08:04 · Score: 1, Troll

Am I the only one who thinks that it is just a little bit irresponsible to publish an article that condones the use software without paying for it? Granted this is a sort of grey area since some people would argue that you're paying for .Mac instead of for the backup software itself but the backup software is designed to be used with the .Mac service so using it without paying Apple is akin to piracy.

The Slashdot community normally champions the cause of Free Software but ordinarily they limit themselves to legitimate Free Software a la Open Source. I think it is shameful to openly encourage software piracy like this.
1. Re:Irresponsible? by cloudscout · 2002-11-10 08:21 · Score: 2, Troll
  
  Apple has written software to be used with their .Mac service. The cost of the software is included in the price of the service. When you use the software without paying for the service you are, in effect, pirating the software. You may justify this in your own mind by claiming that the price of the hardware and the OS should entitle you to the use of the .Mac backup software but that's not how it was intended. The backup software is not a part of the OS. It is not included with the computer. It is a download available to .Mac users. It has built-in safegaurds to prevent use by people who do not pay for a .Mac subscription. By circumventing these mechanisms you are pirating the software.
  
  Now, I'm not going to chide anybody for software piracy itself. What I am doing is pointing a finger at Slashdot for promoting the act. If you choose to pirate software, there's nothing anybody can do about it short of a lawsuit but when you openly encourage others to pirate software, you have crossed the line of ethical behavior.
2. Re:Irresponsible? by cloudscout · 2002-11-10 14:46 · Score: 2, Troll
  
  Actually, anyone who does this is simply using the software they own (it came with OS X, and they bought that, right?) in a manner inconsistent with its design.
  
  Here is where your argument is flawed. The software does NOT come with OSX. You get the backup software when you sign up for the .Mac service. You can download it when you sign up for the free trial account but the software disables itself when your trial account expires. By tricking the software into running after the account's expiration (by setting the trialAccountDaysLeft = -1) you are bypassing the subscription model of the software.
  
  I don't give a flying fsck about intentions. Apple created a product and bundled it with their operating system;
  
  Hello? Is your IQ above 40? The software is NOT bundled with the operating system. The software is bundled with the .Mac subscription which you are expected to PAY FOR. If it was bundled with the OS, you might have a leg to stand on. But it isn't. You have to sign up for the .Mac service in order to get the software. When your subscription ends, so does your right to use the software.
  
  Yes, a .Mac subscription from Apple. But the poster is not cheating Apple; he's not accessing their servers and using their services. And because he's not using THEIR servers, there's no reason that he should pay them anything.
  
  This is ridiculous. So people should be free to use whatever software they want without paying the author as long as they aren't using any of the author's other services? Apple put money into developing the software with the SOLE intention of it being used by paying subscribers to their service. As I pointed out, they even went so far as to make the software disable itself if you stop paying for their service. Someone found a way to disable the subscription check by spoofing server information. That doesn't make it legitimate. It's like software that generates CD keys. Just because it is possible to run Windows without paying for it doesn't mean it's legal. Just because it's possible to run the .Mac backup software without paying for it doesn't mean it's legal either.
  
  But you're out to get something for nothing and that's an attitude you just can't argue with. You feel entitled to something that someone else made and there's just no persuading you otherwise.
.Mac == Ghey Homo by Anonymous Coward · 2002-11-10 08:06 · Score: -1, Troll

Apple .mac is for soccer mom idiots who can't wipe their own ass. Anyone imitating .mac is attempting to convert their hardened lunix box into a homosexual .mac ghey rapist se4rver.

Fuck pigs, g to the oatse, c to the izzex, troll tuesday, propz.

This qwality troll brought to you by yet another shitty article on this lame excuse for a news site.

Ass.
Re:BSD is wonderful by Anonymous Coward · 2002-11-10 08:06 · Score: -1, Troll

What does BSD stand for? Oh oh.. I know.. It's one of those recursive acronyms, isn't it?

BSD Sucks Dick.
Gautam Godse wants you to switch by Anonymous Coward · 2002-11-10 08:07 · Score: -1, Troll

Switch!
Re:BSD is wonderful by Anonymous Coward · 2002-11-10 08:15 · Score: -1, Troll

No, it stands for BiSergic acid Diethelene. It's like LSD, only for homos.
Re:I wonder.. by Anonymous Coward · 2002-11-10 08:24 · Score: -1, Troll

The same number of dicks you'll have shoved down your throat at the same time at your next gangbang.
LAWSUIT by Anonymous Coward · 2002-11-10 08:27 · Score: -1, Troll

I can see a lawsuit coming...
Re:BSD is wonderful by Anonymous Coward · 2002-11-10 08:57 · Score: -1, Troll

Er... this works on non-*BSD systems too, Einstein. *BSD bigots can be real twits sometimes.
Re:Big Whoop by user+no.+590291 · 2002-11-10 10:09 · Score: 0, Troll

3. For all the sheep bleating on about Apple cease-&-desisting this etc. Apple has litigated to protect their trade dress, not this sort of material. After awhile repeating that same sort of foolishness just becomes trolling and unworthy of "News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters"
So Apple threatening a dealer with the DMCA hammer over a patch to allow users to run software they purchased from Apple (iMovie) with their own hardware (non-Superdrive DVD players) is now just "to protect their trade dress"?
Apple may or may not threaten or sue over this, but I sure am quite tired of all the "sheep bleating" (to use your words) apologists that come out after Apple repeatedly breaks out the jackboots on its users.
They're no less evil than Microsoft--they just haven't refined their technique as well as Bill has.
Re:I think this artist just made a big mistake. by Anonymous Coward · 2002-11-10 10:29 · Score: -1, Troll

Are you lost little girl?
Scientists create glow-in-the-dark squirrel by Anonymous Coward · 2002-11-10 12:35 · Score: -1, Troll

by CmdrTaco
Scientists ovver in teh UK have produced a squirrel that glows in the dark. One future benefit of teh developement wil be when bioluminescence is merged with Clapper technology. That way we can all have a squirel in our house adn use him as a reading light and not have to leave our beds to shut it of.