Slashdot Mirror


SGI Introduces World's Densest Server

Twirlip of the Mists writes "Today SGI announced the Origin 3900 server, the world's densest computer. How dense? How about 16 MIPS R14000A processors and 32 GB of RAM in a 4-rack-unit 'superbrick,' for a grand total of 128 processors and 256 GB of RAM in a single rack. That makes the new machine the densest single-system-image computer in the world; it's even denser than most blade systems. Just for fun, the server also includes a whole bunch of 64-bit, 133 MHz PCI-X slots (from 11 up to hundreds and hundreds, depending on configuration). There's coverage of the announcement on ZDNet, CNET, and InfoWorld, as well as on SGI's own site."

5 of 338 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Heating? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Informative

    I meant to mention this in my submission, but it slipped my mind. The R14000A only consumes 17 watts of power. Four of them, plus the Bedrock memory controller chip, plus up to 8 GB of RAM, fit on a board inside a 1 RU clearance. Four of them, plus some nifty backplane hardware, fit into a "superbrick," meaning sixteen processors in 4 RU.

    As far as heat loading goes, the "superbrick" is basically one big wind tunnel, with giant fans on the front and ventilation out the back. It pumps a lot of heat into the room, but the temperature in and around the CPUs is really pretty low. I think it peaks around 35 C.

    --

    I write in my journal
  2. Re:Superbrick's layout? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Informative

    (I'm answering these questions off-the-cuff, so if I mistype any details, sorry.)

    If you know what a first-generation C-brick looks like, imagine squeezing that board into a one-rack-unit form factor and stacking four of them together.

    Each superbrick includes four boards, spaced one unit apart, with four R14Ks, the Bedrock, and some RAM. The boards are connected with an internal eight-port crossbar router, making the superbrick a self-contained 16-processor unit. Externally, the superbrick connects to the base I/O brick via XIO+; the base I/O brick contains stuff like the system disk and the first 11 PCI-X slots.

    I'm not positive how the superbricks are configured. Theoretically, you can partially populate them in one-node increments (meaning 4 CPUs and some RAM), but SGI may or may not sell them that way for manufacturing and QA reasons.

    I believe the CPUs come with 8 MB of s-cache each.

    The CPU-to-CPU and CPU-to-RAM bandwidths vary depending on the topology you're crossing, but I believe the minimum is 1.6 GB/s unidirectional, or 3.2 GB/s bidirectional. Intra-node bandwidths are somewhat higher, I believe.

    No, the CPUs are regular single-core MIPS R14000As. They're tiny chips that don't consume much power, so you can really squeeze 'em in there.

    Keep an eye on techpubs.sgi.com, because SGI will be releasing the developer and owner docs for the new system there shortly. (By "shortly" I mean as soon as a few hours or as long as a few weeks, depending on when the docs get released.) You'll find all the technical data you want when those docs go up.

    --

    I write in my journal
  3. Re:Blade/Origin Comparison by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sun fits 106 processors into a rack. They were previously the record holder. The Origin 3900 is considerably denser than the Sun Fire 15K, both in terms of processor count and PCI-X slot count-- though not at the same time, of course.

    I compared the density of SGI's system to blade systems because those are widely considered to be the densest computers in the world, with something like 90 or 100 individual one-processor computers per rack. This system is not only dense in terms of pure processor count that most-- not all, but most-- blade servers, but it's also got all the advantages of a single system image for HPC applications.

    --

    I write in my journal
  4. Re:Pointless in most datacenters by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, the spec sheet indicates that it is 8.9kW per rack (2.2kW for Drive arrays). That is on the high side, but liveable. (6kW is the max for "standard" cooling-- you can accommodate up to 10kW with a high delta-T cooling system. Water cooling comes into play after that.)

    The value of shrinking it down is (as you allude to) not a real-estate issue, but more about the computing efficiencies of a denser package.

    The HP blades (6U) are about 35kW nameplate per rack, with a real load of about 10-11kW. The energy savings of SGI might actually give it some value in comparison!

  5. Dedicated Application Computing by yoink! · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out Nvidia's data centers. Beware... windows media format warning.

    Notice how many times the word linux is used...