Slashdot Mirror


Trojan Found in libpcap and tcpdump

msolnik writes "Members of The Houston Linux Users Group discovered that the newest sources of libpcap and tcpdump available from tcpdump.org were contaminated with trojan code. HLUG has notified the maintainers of tcpdump.org. See our reports here or here."

18 of 486 comments (clear)

  1. Glad I use Gentoo by rob-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Emerge doesn't get tcpdump source from tcpdump.org, but from ibiblio.org.

    How did it get into tcpdump.org's sources exactly? The HLUG page isn't clear.

    1. Re:Glad I use Gentoo by elrond1999 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Emerge Does get sources from TCPDump if all other mirrors are down. Excerpt from ebuild:
      SRC_URI="http://www.tcpdump.org/release/$ {P}.tar.g z
      http://www.jp.tcpdump.org/release/${P}.tar.gz"

      SRC_URI is a last resort mirror..
      Lucily the MD5 sum catched the trojan: (From the gentoo ebuild digest)
      MD5 03e5eac68c65b7e6ce8da03b0b0b225e tcpdump-3.7.1.tar.gz 428737

  2. Re:This Trojan thing... by JamesO · · Score: 5, Informative

    Its Denis Ritchie

    And he only might have done it (can you tell?)

    See http://www.acm.org/classics/sep95/ for more details

  3. Re:Eventually, this would happen by khendron · · Score: 5, Informative

    Easily detected? I wonder about this. If you look at the date stamp on the trojaned configure script, it is December 10th, 2001.

    Does that mean that this trojan has been around for almost a year before anybody noticed? If that's true, it does not meet my definition of "easily detected".

    --
    Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
  4. Re:Siltakoski Petri is somehow connected with this by Masa · · Score: 4, Informative
    Siltakoski Petri is somehow connected with this

    Yes and no. The information you have successfully received from the Whois database is pointing to the phone company in Finland, which happens to be a host for raketti.net domain. Petri Siltakoski is just an administrative contact of the ISP (Raketti.Net). He has nothing to do with the web page set up by an individual who seems to have an account in this ISP.

  5. Reply from a mirror site to HLUG and tcpdump.org by Dogcow · · Score: 5, Informative

    This was just sent ~1 min ago:

    To : msolnik@hlug.org
    Cc : wt-changes@wiretapped.net,
    tcpdump-workers@tcpdump.org,
    mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca
    Subject : tcpdump.org mirrors
    ----- Message Text -----
    Hi guys,

    I run the main mirror of tcpdump at wiretapped.net (no relation to wiretapped.us) in Australia. We rsync from cvs.tcpdump.org, and have removed the entire tcpdump.org tree and disabled rsync updates until we hear from Michael Richardson at tcpdump.org.

    You may like to add this info to your Updates area, as the unavailability of the main mirror site may seem suspicious. It is not, as described above.

    Because wiretapped.net itself is mirrored to a few other sites, it may take between 1 hour and 24 hours for this removal (and any subsequent re-addition) to take effect. We'll note when it goes back online at http://www.wiretapped.net/changelog.html

    Hope this assists in preventing any further spread,

    Grant
    www.wiretapped.net

  6. Re:So much for peer auditing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm going to try to walk you through this with baby steps.
    let me make sure to put pillows over the sharp corners of the table.

    this was found, just last night, because of the change in the md5 checksum.
    this md5 checksum changed because the file changed.
    this file changed because someone changed it
    so in conclusion, this file has not been like this for a year

    hope you were able to keep up

  7. Re:as soon as this evening... by Megane · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you suspect your binaries to be trjanized, you'd want to sniff your own machine but if (and it is the case) the sniffer is trojanized, then it could possible hide such "activities"... I actually read the article and it however seems that it was not the case here...

    If you read the article more carefully, you will notice that the binaries aren't trojaned. This is a trojan in the build scripts only. So ironically, only the paranoids who build from source (but aren't paranoid enough to demand an MD5) got hit by this.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  8. facts, not fiction. by F2F · · Score: 5, Informative

    the article is called 'reflections on trusting trust' and Ken Thompson wrote it upon inception of the ACM distinguished scientist award. now, we all know you are full of shit (since you can't even spell his name right) but claiming that 'each version of login was compromised' is so far off base that it't not even funny.

    follow the link posted already, read it and try to understand what he fundamentally tries to tell you. then go and read aleph1's 'smashing the stack for fun and profit' and try to get a glimpse of what 'hacking' was considered in the 80s.

  9. Re:This Trojan thing... by F2F · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's Ken Thompson. How do I know? His name is right beneath the title of the article you linked.

  10. NO!!!! NO!!! NO!!! by AxelTorvalds · · Score: 5, Informative
    md5 checksums are nice but if I was going to put a trojan in to something, I'd probably rebuild the md5sum too. Basically md5sum is a glorified CRC at the end of the gzip, nothing more and nothing less.

    Do this: Download gpg from gnupg.org. Build it. Generate yourself a key. Try to get some of your friends to sign it. submit it to keyserver.net. Sign your code with that key. While you're at it, start using kmail, evolution, or mozilla with enigmail and start signing your emails too. Do it religiously.

    Check sigs when you download code too.

  11. Re:Eventually, this would happen by r55man · · Score: 5, Informative
    Does that mean that this trojan has been around for almost a year before anybody noticed? If that's true, it does not meet my definition of "easily detected".

    I downloaded libpcap/0.7.1 from tcpdump.org on September 2 of this year (just 2 months ago), and it was not trojaned (I keep a record of md5 sums, and was able to check this just now).

    Probably whoever modified the file just touched it to resotre the original timestamp. This is trivial to do.

  12. Sandbox Your Applications by gehirntot · · Score: 5, Informative
    Lately, we have seen many trojaned distributions. To prevent these problems from affecting us in the future, we need to use cryptographic signatures as part of software distribution. Otherwise, we never know if a particular piece of software is authentic or not. Signature checking needs to be part of the installation process. I believe that Debian's aptget is one of the few tools that actually does this.

    In the meanwhile, I suggest that you run all your untrusted software in a sandbox like Systrace which is available for the BSDs and Linux.

    This screenshot shows Dug Song detecting the trojan in the Fragroute distribution. Systrace allows you to run completely untrusted applications in a sandbox. The security policy is created on the fly with the user deciding what an application is allowed to do.

    We need to be much more careful about the software that we run.

  13. a quick test to see if your hit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    login as root (or whoever can run tcpdump)

    tcpdump -n host 212.146.0.34 &
    telnet 212.146.0.34 1963

    if tcpdump sees the connection since it isn't ignoring port 1963, if you don't see the connection, then your tcpdump is ignoring port 1963

    and well, its always nice to /. your local rooted base.
    the people at 212.146.0.34 should change it to something like /usr/bin/tcpd echo 'A' (i think that was the quit code)

    if this test is wrong, well, so be it, i'm still new at this linux thing, but i'm better at linux then i am at spelling (boy, i should be an /. editor)
    --Anonymous Coward

  14. Early news from tcpdump.org by fenner · · Score: 5, Informative

    I moved the binaries on the tcpdump.org web site, so that the "download" links won't work.

    "ls -c" says that the modified binaries were installed at Nov 11 10:14:00 2002 GMT.

    Preliminary inspection says that the CVS repository is O.K.

  15. Re:as soon as this evening... by kevinank · · Score: 5, Informative
    Okay, I've been confused about this MD5 thing. Most often, the MD5s are either in a file in the ftproot, or in the readme if you've owned the server enough to stick a trojan in the source code, can't you just put in the MD5s of your altered source?

    To be useful the MD5 file should be signed, and the GPG key that signed it should be one that you know and trust. Even that may not be enough if the key owner can be tricked into revealing his private key, or the trojan horse can be introduced into the code on the code owners development machine, but it does add one layer of depth to your security.

    The first time I had a server hacked (mountd exploit, xmas '99) the machine details were sold on IRC, probably in exchange for credit card numbers, to a somewhat clueless Singapore exchange student who proceeded to delete all of my syslog files so that when I logged in remotely the root mailbox was full of complaints about missing logfiles. The rooted system was up for about a week, during which time it probed several thousand IPs for basic exploits, hosted an IRC channel through eggdrop (together with names of the hacker's friends and passwords), all on a machine with no rootkit installed and very little attempt to hide activity.

    Basically I got lucky the first time, and ever since then I've been paranoid, in hopes there won't be a second time. But with a smart hacker and a good root kit, I think even with my paranoia that I could miss a hacker on my machine for a long time, so I suspect it is only a matter of time before some well known developer gets hacked and has signed sources distributed with a trojan horse inside.

    --
    LibBT: BitTorrent for C - small - fast - clean (Now Versio
  16. Date of Trojan is after Nov 1, 2002 by Skjellifetti · · Score: 5, Informative

    I downloaded and installed libpcap and tcpdump on Nov 1. The versions I have came from tcpdump.org. md5sum shows that they have the correct checksum and not the trojaned checksum as reported on the Houston LUG page. A grep of the sources for the port number and ip found in the trojan reports null. It looks like the trojan files were placed on tcpdump.org after Nov 1, 2002.

  17. Re:Eventually, this would happen by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Informative
    Remember Interbase? It came with a trojan from Borland. The Open Source folks found it only AFTER the program was made open source. It had the trojan for at least 6 years before it became Open Source. It was running airplane reservation systems. Somebody got a lot of free flights.

    Why do you think only an employee can trojan a binary, anyway? Most viruses modify binaries. Certainly many virus-infected binaries have been distributed professionally.

    Bruce