Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Redirecting NASA

Posted by michael on from the going-ballistic dept.

anzha writes "Many people have been sitting and waiting to see what Sean O'Keefe, the new head honcho @NASA, would do with the agency. Would he clean out the temple? Would he simply go through the motions? Spaceref has an interesting article up about what O'Keefe intends for the agency's future. It highlights the changes that are going to happen this year."

4 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    All this funding and planning and still there's no talk whatsoever of extensive research into sex in zero-g.

    What's the point of having a space program if it doesn't do things that will make for better cartoons in Hustler???

  2. Porn in space - cure the funding shortage by Sabalon · · Score: 5, Funny

    C'mon - just get a couple starlets up there with a crew and let them go at it. We all know how porn sells - zero G porn would probably sell pretty well and bring in tons of money for NASA.

    Just imagine the position the stars could get into!!!

  3. Re:plan... and then? by Zeebs · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd say just tell everyone there are terrorists up there and we have to get them. Problem solved.

    --

    Happy Noodle Boy says "F###ing doughnut! Mock me? You fried cyclops!!"
  4. Re:Other head of NASA by paiute · · Score: 3, Funny

    So the ISS was the "secure and undisclosed location"?

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine