Slashdot Mirror


EFF Urges Support for Rep. Boucher's DMCRA

DarkSparks writes "The EFF is urging everyone to contact their Representatives and ask them to co-sponsor Representative Rick Boucher and John Doolittle's recently introduced Digital Media Consumers' Rights Act (DMCRA, H.R. 5544), which would introduce labelling requirements for usage-impaired "copy-protected" compact discs, as well as make several key amendments to the DMCA, including affirming the right of scientific research into technology protection measures and affirming the right of citizens to circumvent technology measures to gain access to copyrighted works they've purchased."

4 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. Re:::cannot be copied:: by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Followed by: "The Sound Quality Of This Disc Has Intentionally Been Reduced To Prevent You From Pirating It You Thief - Now Buy It Like We Tell You To!"

    Maybe when publishing companies (music and film both) start realizing that consumers are the ones who pay their salary, they'll start treating us with less contempt. Sorry to say that there are a whole lot of people who are NOT sheep content to be shorn of their hard-earned money.

    At some point when faced with all of the DRM crap that companies are trying to force us into, I'll just decide to move on to other activities which are less technologically oriented.

    Even now, the rise in film prices to over $12 per ticket is severely limiting the number of movies I go to. That doesn't mean I download them on the PC or anything, but I just spend my time doing other things instead...

    --
    "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  2. Re:No! by Silverlock · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is not attempting to be another law, and thereby conflicting with the DMCA. It ammends the DMCA..

    "Section 5 makes the necessary changes to the DMCA to restore the historic balance in U.S. copyright law."

    You can't (AFAIK) make changes to law without going through the process of sponsoring another bill, etc.. It doesn't mean we will have two sets of laws, only that the originals will be changed. They do not want to repeal the entire DMCA, just correct it.

  3. How to contact your Congresscritter by alizard · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Send a $1000 (or whatever the individual campaign contribution limit is) check via snailmail to his district office, the one LOCAL to you.

    Give his office a call in a few days and let them know you'd like to discuss your concerns about the bill with your Congresscritter.

    Tell him how you want him to vote and briefly, why.

    If a few hundred people in your district do this, you've got yourself a new friend and a vote.

    Of course, a high tech community PAC would save us all a lot of trouble in this area.

  4. A different and maybe better letter by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am writing today to ask you to co-sponsor Rep. Boucher &
    Doolittle's Digital Media Consumers' Rights Act (DMCRA, H.R. 5544).
    I believe that recent movements in copyright law have unfairly plagued
    the rights of consumers with respect to their ownership of digital
    media.

    Specifically, the DMCRA would require producers of digital media to
    label any media that has been copy protected or otherwise crippled
    in a way that would make that media unusable in certain devices, such
    as personal computers, automotive stereo equipment, and other consumer
    devices. I believe that consumers have the right to informed consent
    with respect to purchases of digital media.

    The DMCRA would also codify the right of the consumer to make fair-use
    copies of any media they own. For example, a consumer who purchases a
    CD should be explicitly allowed and encouraged by law to make copies of
    that information for use in his/her automobile, portable diskless audio player,
    or other device that may not be able to access that information on its
    native media.

    I also wish to convey and affirm my belief that it is absolutely wrong
    to make copies of information for the purpose of avoiding paying for it.
    Supporting this law is not supporting theft of intellectual property. It
    is unfortunate that those who would use tools such as personal computers
    and peer-to-peer networks to steal information have brought about the
    changes in copyright law that have stripped the rights of law-abiding
    consumers. It should be solemnly noted that personal computers don't
    cause people to steal music just as peer-to-peer networks are not the cause
    of piracy. We have seen many new and innovative technologies that have
    a perfectly legitimate use in society, destroyed by the idea that it is
    appropriate to punish everyone for the crimes of a select few who choose
    to misuse those technologies.

    There are other benefits to the DMCRA, both for consumers and our society
    as a whole, and I emplore you to study this document for all of its merits.
    I hope you will co-sponsor the DMCRA and show your support for the
    public's rights in digital media. Thank you for your time.

    Sincerely,