Slashdot Mirror


Publishers' Attack Free Government Sites

An anonymous reader writes "After succeding in getting the DOE's PubScience shutdown the Software and Information Industry Association and publishers' are now targeting more. If the trend continues local tax dollars will increasingly be spent to buy access to information the federal government used to provide."

2 of 395 comments (clear)

  1. Breeding elitism by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    LeDuc said it is fairer to charge researchers for the articles they use than to charge taxpayers for the cost of running a Web site that makes them available for free.

    Yeah, God forbid any old moron be able to access scientific papers and advanced knowledge. That's a commie concept. People should be happy with whatever the ad-supported news media gives them for free.

    I would think making such information available would be in the interest of everyone... except those people who see a way to make a buck off it, which probably says a lot in itself.

    Two in particular rile SIIA members: "One is law-related, the other has to do with agriculture," LeDuc said. He declined to identify them further.

    Anyone care to guess which useful databases are about to be locked off to anyone who can't cough up the required dough?

    I could go into a rant about how a "free market" in so-called intellectual property seems to rely heavily on restricting access to existing information instead of increasing access to previously-unpublished information, but I'll leave someone else to get flamed by the mindless defenders of privatization right or wrong.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
  2. Re:a better title would be: by StormReaver · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Your title and description are completely wrong.

    The DOE was publishing information that was acquired through tax-funded government research. The results of the research were being returned to those who paid for it: tax payers.

    This assanine publishing organization, which was taking this government-funded research and selling it, wanted to take the results and make libraries and individuals pay again to be able to see the results.

    This is a case of private industry stealing public information under conspiracy with the federal government.